9.SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİ İLE FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ FİZİKSEL VE KİMYASAL OLAYLAR KONUSUNDA Kİ ALTERNATİF KAVRAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Journal Name:
- Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Publication Year:
- 2012
Keywords (Original Language):
Author Name | University of Author | Faculty of Author |
---|---|---|
REFERENCES
Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five
chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2).
Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J., Marek, E. A.,1992. Understandings and Misunderstandings of
Eight Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29: 105.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist
Classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD - Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
BouJaoude, S. B., 1991. A Study of the Nature of Students' Understanding about the Concept of Burning,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8): 689-704.
Çalik, M., Ayas A. & Coll R.K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primaryteachers’ conceptual understanding of
solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal Science Math Education, 5(1), 1–28.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Kasım 2012, Cilt 1, Sayı 4, Makale 14, ISSN: 2146-9199
125
Calik, M., Ayas, A., Ebenezer, J.V. (2005). A Review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’
conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50.
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Students’ conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches, In Improving
Science Education, edited by Barry J. Fraser and Herbert J. Walberg, pp. 46-69. University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, G.L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenograpy.
Science Education, 80, 181–201.
Fensham, P. J., (1992). Science and technology. In PW Jackson(Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp.
789–829). NewYork: Macmillan.
Ginns, I.S. & Watters, J.J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of pre-service elementary teacher
education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205–222.
Goodwin, A. (1995). Is salt melting when it dissolves in water? Journal of Chemica Education, 79, 393–396.
Guzzetti, B. J., 2000. Learning Counter Intuitive Science Concepts: What Have We Learned From Over a Decade
of Research?, Reading, Writing, Quarterly, 16(2): 89-95.
Hand, B. & Treagust, D.F. (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using a
constructive framework. School Science and Mathematics,91(4), 172-176.
Heermann, B., 1988. Teaching and learning with computers. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, London.
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and Science Education: A Further Appraisal, Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134.
Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry? Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-
196.
Nicoll, G. (2001). A Report of Undergraduates’ Bonding Misconception. International Journal of Science
Education, 23(7), 707-730.
Özmen, H. & Kolomuç, A. (2004). Bilgisayarlı öğretimin çözeltiler konusundaki öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Gazi
Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 57 - 68.
Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and
its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 249–262.
Vermette, P., Foote, C., Bird, C., Mesibov, D., Harris-Ewing, S. & Battaglia, C. (2001). “Understanding
Constructivism(s): A Primer for Parents and School Board Members”, Education, 122(1), 87-93.