Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W. & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings
of eight graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2),
105-120.
Aslan, A. ve & Demircioglu, G. (2014). The effect of video-assisted conceptual change texts on 12th grade
students’ alternative conceptions: The gas concept. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3115-3119.
Aydeniz, M., Pabuçcu, A., Çetin, P. S. & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and students’ conceptual understanding
of properties and behaviors of gases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1303-
1324.
Azizoğlu, N. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Students’ preconceptions and misconceptions about gases. Journal of Balikesir
University Institute of Science and Technology, 6(1), 73-78.
Benson, D. L., Wittrock, C. M. & Baur, M. E. (1993). Students’ preconceptions of the nature of gases. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 587-597.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. S. & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education,
63(1), 64-66.
Chiu, M. H. (2007). A national survey of students ‘conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of
Science Education, 29(4), 421-452.
Clough, E. E. & Driver, R. (1986). A Study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across
different task contexts. Science Education, 70(4), 473-496.
Coll, R. K. & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ use of analogy and alternative conceptions for chemical bonding.
Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(1), 24–32.
de Berg, K. C. (1992). Students’ thinking in relation to pressure-volume changes of a fixed amount of air: the
semi-quantitative context. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 295-303.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Ağustos 2016 Cilt:5 Sayı:3 Makale No: 07 ISSN: 2146-9199
69
de Berg, K. C. (1995). Student understanding of the volume, mass, and pressure of air within a sealed syringe in
different states of compression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 871-884.
Demircioglu, G. & Yadigaroglu, M. (2013). A comparison of level of understanding of student teachers and high
school students related to the gas concept. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 116, 2890-2894.
Demircioğlu, G., Demircioğlu, H. & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2013). An investigation of chemistry student teachers’
understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their
Implications, 4(2), 192-199.
Demircioğlu, H., Akdeniz, A. R. ve Demircioğlu, G. (2003). Maddenin tanecikli yapısına ilişkin kavram
yanılgılarının giderilmesinde çalışma yapraklarının etkisi., Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü XII. Eğitim
Bilimleri Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı 3, 2137-2160, Ankara.
Demircioğlu, H., Ayas, A., Demircioğlu, G. & Özmen, H. (2015). Effects of storylines embedded within the
context-based approach on pre-service primary school teachers’ conceptions of matter and its states. Asia-
Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16, 2, 4.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science., London:
Routledge.
Eskilsson, O. & Helldén, G. (2003). A longitudinal study on 10-12-year-olds´ conceptions of the transformations
of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(3), 291-304.
Gilbert, J. K. & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing Changing
perspective in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J. & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Chidren’s science and its consequences for teaching.
Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
Glynn, S. (1989). The Teaching teaching with analogies (TWA) model: Explaining concepts in expository text. In
K. D. MUTH (ed.), Children’s Comprehension of Text: Research into Practice, International Reading Association,
Newark, DE.
Griffiths, A. K. & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental
characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning Ccounter-intuitive science concepts: Wwhat have we learned from over a
decade of research, . Reading, Writing, Quarterly, 16(2), 89-95.
Hewson, P. W. & Hewson, M. G. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching
science., Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(3), 191-209.
Hwang, B. (1995). Students’ conceptual representation of gas volume in relation to particulate model of matter.
Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching San
Francisco, CA, April 22-25.
Hwang, B. & Chiu, S. (2004). The effect of a computer instructional model in bringing about a conceptual change
in students’ understanding of particulate concepts of gas. In Paper presented in Informing Science and IT
Education Joint Conference, Rockhampton, Australia.
Jones, E. L. & Anderson, C. W. (1998). Students’ model of matter: the understanding and explanation of gas
behavior, Paper Accepted for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in
Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Ağustos 2016 Cilt:5 Sayı:3 Makale No: 07 ISSN: 2146-9199
70
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (28. Baskı), Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D. & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school
students’ conceptions of matter and molecules., Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249-270.
Lin, H-S., Cheng, H-J. & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The assessment of students and teachers’ understanding of gas
laws. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 235- 238.
Mas, C. J. F., Perez, J. H. & Harris, H. H. (1987). Parallels between adolescents’ conception of gases and history
of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(7), 616-618.
Mayer, K. (2011). Addressing students' misconceptions about gases, mass, and composition. Research: Science
and Education, 88(1), 111-115.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-
196.
Niaz, M. & Robinson, W. (1992). From ‘algorithmic mode’ to conceptual gestalt in understanding the behavior
of gases: an epistemological education. Research in Science ve Technological Education, 10(1), 1-9.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter:
An interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281.
Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: a A cross-age study,
Science Education, 65(2), 187-196.
Osborne, R. J. & Schollum, B.W. (1983). Coping in chemistry., Australian Science Teachers Journal, 29(1), 13-24.
Preston, R. F., Treagust, D. F. &Garnett, P. (1986). “Identification of secondary student’s misconceptions of
covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic test instrument. Research in Science Education, 16,
40-48.
Séré, M. G. (1986). Children’s conceptions of the gaseous state, prior to teaching. European Journal of Science
Education, 8(4), 413-425.
Stavy, R. (1988). Children's conception of gas. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 553-560.
Stavy, R. (1990). Children’s conception of changes in the state of matter: Ffrom liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com