You are here

Home » Content

FİZİK EĞİTİMİNDE AKTİF ÖĞRENME SINIFLARI

ACTIVE LEARNING CLASSROOMS IN PHYSICS EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Innovations in science teaching and the introduction of technological materials into educational environments have led to the emergence of classes in which new teaching models are applied. These classes, based on constructivist learning and using the active learning approach, were first applied in the field of physics education with the name "active learning classes". These classes are examined under two general models as traditional and full studio. The active classes using the traditional model are examined under three headings as exploratory laboratories, course-based models and out-of-class practice-based models. In the full studio model, the theoretical course, the practice and the laboratory course classifications have been abolished. These classes, which were established in the field of physics education, have been inspired by the establishment of new classes and new approaches that can be used both in science education and in other fields by taking samples by many universities and institutions over time. The aim of this study is both to provide examples from these classes and to discuss the impact of these classes on the educational field.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Fen öğretimi alanındaki yenilikler ve teknolojik malzemelerin gelişerek eğitim ortamlarına girmeye başlaması yeni öğretim modellerinin uygulandığı sınıfların ortaya çıkmasına sebep olmuştur. Yapılandırmacı öğrenmeye dayanan ve aktif öğrenme yaklaşımının kullanıldığı bu sınıflar “aktif öğrenme sınıfları” adı ile ilk defa fizik eğitimi alanında uygulanmıştır. Bu sınıflar geleneksel ve tam stüdyo olarak iki genel model altında incelenmektedir. Geleneksel modelin kullanıldığı aktif sınıflar keşfedici laboratuarlar, ders temelli modeller ve ders dışı uygulama temelli modeller olarak üç başlık altında incelenmektedir. Tam stüdyo modelinde ise teorik ders, uygulama ve laboratuar dersi ayrımı ortadan kaldırılmıştır. Fizik eğitimi alanında kurulan bu sınıflar, zamanla pek çok üniversite ve kurum tarafından örnek alınarak hem fen eğitiminde hem de diğer alanlarda kullanılabilecek yeni sınıfların kurulmasına ve yeni yaklaşımların ortaya atılmasına ilham kaynağı olmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı hem bu sınıflardan örnekler sunmak hem de kurulan bu sınıfların eğitim alanındaki etkisini tartışmaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-fizik-egitiminde-aktif-ogrenme-siniflari.pdf
  • 1
267
282
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Belcher, J. (2001). Studio physics at MIT. MIT Physics Annual , 58-64.
Bell, D., & Kahrhoff, J. (2006). Active learning handbook. 12.02.2015 tarihinde Webster University:
http://www.webster.edu/fdc/alhb/alhb2006.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
Bernhard, J. (2000, June). Improving engineering physics teaching-learning from physics education
research. Paper presented at Physics Teaching in Engineering Education, Budapest.
Crouch, C. H. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American
Journal of Physics, 69 (9), 970-977.
Cummings, K., Marx, J., Thornton, R., & Kuhl, D. (1999). Evaluating innovation in studio physics.
American Journal of Physics , 67 (7), 38-44.
Dori, Y., Belcher, J., Bessette, M., Dangizer, M., McKinney, A., & Hult, E. (2003). Technology for active
learning. Review Feature , 44-49.
Edwards, S. (2015). Active learning in the middle grades. Middle School Journal , 26-32.
Gaffney, J. D., Richards, E., Kustusch, M. B., Ding, L., & Beichner, R. J. (2008). Scaling up education
reform. Journal of College Science Teaching , 18-23.
Gatch, D. (2010). Restructuring introductory physics by adapting an active learning studio model.
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 4 (2), 1-12.
Hake, R. R. (1992). Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory. The Physics Teacher , 546-
552.
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2:
designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics , 60, (7), 637-644.
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping.
American Journal of Physics , 60 (7), 627-636.
Heuvelen, A. V. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: a review of research-based instructional
strategies. American Journal of Physics , 59 (10), 891-897.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Haziran 2017 Cilt:6 Özel Sayı:1 Makale No: 23 ISSN: 2146-9199
281
http://www.lib.vt.edu/instruct/classrooms/scaleupclass.html (erişim tarihi: 01.02.2015).
https://www.mcgill.ca/tls/spaces/classrooms#activelearningroom (erişim tarihi: 09.11.2015).
http://www.ncsu.edu/per/scaleup.html (erişim tarihi: 08.11.2015).
Kırtak Ad, V. N. (2016). Tam stüdyo modelinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının kavramsal anlamaları ile
sosyal duygusal öğrenme, sorgulama ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi: akışkanlar mekaniği örneği .
Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
Knight, R. D. (2004). Five easy lessons, strategies for successful physics teaching. San Francisco:
Addison Wesley.
Lasry, N., Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: from Harvard to the two-year college.
American Journal of Physics , 76 (11), 1066-1069.
Laws, P. W. (1991).Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today , 44 (12), 24-31.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: a user’s manual. Harvard University. Prentice Hall. Series in
Educational Innovation.
McDermott, L. (1996a). Physics by inquiry-volume I. . United State of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McDermott, L. (1996b). Physics by inquiry-volume II. United State of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McDermott, L., & Shaffer, S. (2002a). Tutorials introductory physics. (1st ed.), United State of America:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
McDermott, L., & Shaffer, S. (2002b). Tutorials in introductory physics-homework. ( 1st ed.), United
State of America: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
McDermott, L., Shaffer, P., & Vokos, S. (1997). Sample class on physics by inquiry. In E.F. Redish and
J. Rigden, (Eds.). AIP Conference Proceedings 399 (s. 989-1005). New York: American Institute of
Physics.
Redish, E. F. (2000). New models of physics ınstruction based on physics education research . Paper
presented at the Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft (Jena, Germany, March 14, 1996).
Redish, E., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1997). On the effectiveness of active engagement microcomputerbased
laboratories. American Journal of Physics , 65, 45-54.
Saul, J., & Redish, E. (1998). Final Evaluation Report for FIPSE Grant #P116P50026: Evaluation of the
Workshop Physics Dissemination Project. College Park: Physics Education Research Group University of
Maryland.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Haziran 2017 Cilt:6 Özel Sayı:1 Makale No: 23 ISSN: 2146-9199
282
Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1997). Using Interactive Lecture Demonstrations to Create an Active
Learning Environment.In E. F. Redish and J. Rigden, (Eds.). AIP Conference Proceedings 399 (s. 1061–
1074). New York: American Institute of Physics.
Steinberg, R., Wittmann, M., & Redish, E. (1997). Mathematical tutorials in introductory physics. E. F.
Redish and J. Rigden, (Eds),. AIP Conference Proceedings 399 (s. 1075-1092). New York: American
Institute of Physics.
Şahin, M. (2007). The importance of efficiency in active learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education,
4 (2), 61-74.
Tezci, E., & Yıldırım, B. (2007). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme. Balıkesir: Balıkesir Onur
Kırtasiye.
Thornton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking microcomputer-basde laboratories for physics
teaching. Physics Education , 22, 229-238.
Thornton, R. K. (1989). Tools for scientific thinking-learning physical conceptes with real-time
laboratory measurements tools, (Ed. Redish, E. F.). Proceedings of conference on computers in physics
instruction (s. 177-489). Addison Wesley: Reading.
Thornton, R. K. (1997). Learning physics concepts in the introductory course: microcomputer-based
labs and interactive lecture demonstrations. J. Wilson (Ed.). Proceeding of Conference on Introductory
Physics Course (s. 69-86). New York: Wiley.
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of newton's laws: the force and
motional conceptual evalution and the evalution of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula.
American Journal of Physics , 66 (4), 338-352.
Sokoloff, D. R., Laws, P. W., & Thornton, R. K. (2007). Real Time Physics: active learning labs
transforming the introductory laboratory. European Journal of Physics , 28, 83-94.
Ün Açıkgöz, K. (2011). Aktif öğrenme (12.baskı). İzmir: Biliş.
Yıldırım, B. ve Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuar
dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. El-Cezeri Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2 (2), 28-40.
Wilson, J. (1994). The CUPLE Physics studio. The Physics Teacher , 32, 518-523.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com