You are here

Home » Content

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE YAŞAM DOYUMUNU YORDAMADA BİREYSEL BÜTÜNLÜK (TUTARLILIK) DUYGUSU, AİLE BÜTÜNLÜK DUYGUSU VE BENLİKSAYGISI

SENSE OF COHERENCE, FAMILY SENSE OF COHERENCE AND SELF ESTEEM IN PREDICTING LIFE SATISFACTION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between life satisfaction and individualistic sense of coherence (comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness), family sense of coherence, self esteem and to examine which variables (the sense of coherence, family sense of coherence and self esteem) the best predictor of life satisfaction. The participants of the study were 250 female (64%), 143 male (36%) total 393 university students. The age range was 19.45. To collect data Life Satisfaction Scale, Sense of Coherence, Family Sense of Coherence and Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale were used. After collecting data Pearson Momentum Correlation and Stepwise regression statistic analysis were applied. The results indicated that there are significant positive moderate and relatively strong correlations between life satisfaction and individualistic sense of coherence, family sense of coherence and self esteem. The findings of this study supported Antonovsky’s theoritical frame. In addition the stepwise regression analyses indicated that comprehensibility (cognitive dimension) dimension of sense coherence was the best predictor of life satisfaction. The other variables were family sense of coherence, self esteem, manageability and meaningfulness respectively. All variables explained 40% of total variance.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu arastırmanın amacı yasam doyumunun yordanmasında bireysel bütünlük duygusu (anlasılabilirlik, anlamlılık, yönetme), aile bütünlük duygusu ve benlik saygısı degiskenlerinin ne düzeyde katkıda bulundugunu belirlemektir. Arastırmanın çalısma grubunu Çukurova Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesine devam eden 250 kız (%64), 143 erkek (%36) toplam 393 üniversite ögrencisi olusturmustur. Arastırmaya katılan deneklerin yas ortalaması 19.45’tir. Arastırmada veri toplamak amacıyla Bireysel Bütünlük (Tutarlılık) Duygusu Ölçegi , Aile Bütünlük Duygusu Ölçegi , Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Envanteri ve Yasam Doyumu Ölçekleri uygulanmıstır. Arastırmadan elde edilen verilerin analizinde Pearson Momentum Korelasyon ve Asamalı Regresyon teknikleri kullanılmıstır. Arastırmanın bulguları Antonovsky’nin belirledigi kuramsal yapıyı destekler niteliktedir. Arastırma bulguları beklenildigi yönde yasam doyumu ile bireysel, ailesel bütünlük duygusu ve benlik saygısı arasında olumlu orta ve göreli olarak güçlü düzeyde iliskiler oldugunu göstermektedir. Yasam doyumunu yordamaya iliskin ele alınan tüm degiskenler toplam varyansın %40’ını açıkladıgı görülmüstür. Yasam doyumunu yordamaya en fazla katkıda bulunan degiskenin bireysel bütünlük duygusunun alt boyutu olan anlasılabilirlik boyutu oldugu bunu sırasıyla aile bütünlük duygusu, benlik saygısı, yönetilebilirlik ve anlamlılık degiskenlerinin izledigi saptanmıstır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 46-378-1-pb.pdf
  • 1
19-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderzen,I., Arnetz,B.B.(1999). Psycho Psychophysiological reactions to
international adjustment.Results from a controlled, longitudinal study.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 68 (2):67–75
Antonovsky,A. (1979). Health, Stres and Coping. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Antonovsky,A. (1987). Unraveling Mystery of Health. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Antonovsky, A., Sagy, S.(1985). The development of SOC and it’s impact on
responses to stress situations. Journal of Psychology 126 (2), 213-225.
Antonovsky,A. (1991). The structural sources of salutogenic strengths.
In.C.L.Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.) Individual Differences: Personality
and Stress (p.67-104).
Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the Sense of
Coherence Scale.Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725–733.
Antonovsky, A. ( 1993). Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and
civility. Social Science and Medicine, 37 (8), 969-981.
Antonovsky, A., Sourani, T. (1988). Family sense of coherence and family
adaptation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 79-82.
Berg, A.,Hallberg, I.R. (1999). Effects of systematic clinical supervision on
psychiatric nurses’ sense of coherence, creativity, workrelated strain,
job satisfaction and view of the effects from clinical supervision: a prepost
test design. Journal of Psychiatry Mental Health
Nursing.6,371–381.
Campbell, A. (1981). The Sense of Well-Being in America: Recent Patterns
and Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cheng,H., Furnham, A. (2003). Personality, self esteem, and demographic
predictions of happiness and depression. Personality and Individual
Differences, 34,6, 921-942.
Compton, W.C. (2000). Meaningfulness as a mediator of subjective wellbeing.
Psychological Reports, 87,156-160.
Çeçen,A.R. (2007). Aile Bütünlük Duygusu Ölçegi (ABDÖ-K) Kısa
Formunun Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalısmaları,
IX. Ulusal Psikolojik Danısma ve Rehberlik Kongresi (Sözlü bildiri),
17-19 Ekim, Jzmir Çesme.
Çivitçi,A. (2007). Çok boyutlu ögrenci yasam doyumu ölçeginin Türkçe’ye
uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalısmaları, Egitim
Arastırmaları Dergisi, 7, 26, 51-60.
Çuhadaroglu F (1986) Adolesanlarda benlik saygısı. Yayınlanmamıs
Uzmanlık Tezi Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri
Bölümü, Ankara.
DeNeve, K.M., Cooper,H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta analysis of
137 personality traits and subjective well being, Psychological
Bulletin, 124, 2, 197-229.
Deniz, M.E. (2006). The relationships among coping with stress, life
satisfaction, decision making styles and desicion self esteem: An
investigation with Turkish University Students. Social Behaviour and
Personality, 34,9, 1161-1170
Diener, E. & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction
and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,
653–663.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction
with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71–75.
Feldt, T., Leskinen, E., Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor
analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence.
Personality and Individual Differences. 28, 239–257.
Flannery,R., Flannery,G. (1990). Sense of coherence, life stress, and
psychological distress: A prospective methodological inquiry. Journal
of Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 415-420.
Freeman, R.B. (1978), “Job Satisfaction as an Economic Variable”,American
Economic Review, 68,2, 135-141.
Heiman, T. (2004). Examination of the salutogenic model, support resources,
coping style and stressors among Israeli university students. The
Journal of Psychology, 138 (6), 505-520.
Jahnsen, R., Villien, L., Straghelle, J. K., & Holm, I. (2002). Coping potential
and disability sense of coherence in adults with cerebral palsy.
Disability and Rehabilitation,24, 511–518
Kaiser, C. F., Sattler, D. N., Bellack, D. R., & Dersin, J. A. (1996).
Conservation of resources approach to a natural disaster: Sense of
coherence and psychological distress. Journal of Social Behavior and
Personality, 11, 459–476.
Karlsson,I., Berglin, E., Larsson, P.A.(2000). Sense of coherence: quality of
life before and after coronary artery bypass surgery a longitudinal
study. Journal of Advance Nursing. 31,6,1383–1392.
Köker, S. (1991). “Normal ve Sorunlu Ergenlerin Yasam Doyumu
Düzeylerinin Karsılastırılması”. (Yayınlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi).
Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Leung, J. P. & Leung, K. (1992). Life satisfaction, self-concept, and
relationship with parents in adolescence. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 21, 653–665.
Lu, L., Shih, J.B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach,
Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 2, 181-188.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E. & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being
measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71, 616–
628.
Myers, D. G., Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?, Psychological Science.6, 10-
19.
Nesbitt, B.J.,Heidrich, S.M. (2000) Sense of coherence and illness appraisal in
older women’s quality of life. Nursing Health 23, 25–34
Pavot,W., Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self
reported measures of subjective well-being, Social Indicators
Research, 28, 1-20.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Sagy,S. (1998). Effects of personal, family and comunity characteristics of
emotional reactions in a stress situation: The Golan Heights
negotiations. Youth and Society, 29,311-329.
Sagy,S. (2002). Moderating factors explaning stres reactions: Comparing
prolonged versus acute community stress situations. Journal of
Psychology, 136 (4), 407-419.
Scherler,R.H., Lajunen,T.(1997). A comparison of Finnish and Turkish
university students on the short form of the sense of coherence scale,
Fifth Congress of European Psychology ,6-11 July, Dublin, Ireland.
Schnyder, U., Buchi, S., Sensky, T.,Klaghofer, R. (2000). Antonovsky’s Sense
of Coherence: trait or state? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic,69,
296–302.
Selçukoglu, Z. (2001). “Arastırma Görevlilerinde Tükenmislik Düzeyi ile
Yalnızlık Düzeyi ve Yasam Doyumu Arasındaki Jliskinin Bazı
Degiskenler Açısından Degerlendirilmesi”. (Yayınlanmamıs Yüksek
Lisans Tezi). Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Veenhoven, R. (1991), “Is Happiness Relative?” Social Indicators Research,
24, 1-34.
Wickens, L., Greeff, A. (2005)Sense of family coherence and the utilization of
resources by first year students. American Journal of Family
Therapy, 33, 5,427-441.
Yetim, Ü. (1991). Kisisel Projelerin Organizasyonu ve Örüntüsü Açısından
Yasam Doyumu, Yayınlanmamıs Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi,
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com