You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMEN EĞİTİMİNE KLİNİK DENEYİMLERİ ENTEGRE ETMEK İÇİN MÜFRADAT HARİTASI

CURRICULUM MAPPING TO INTEGRATE CLINICAL EXPERIENCES IN TEACHER EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Mapping, a tool used in K-12 environments to create curricular coherence, has been infrequently applied in the higher education setting although it is ideally suited to integrate theory and practice. This study reports on the ways curriculum mapping supported faculty in re-tooling their courses to create consistency of clinical experiences in four teacher education programs. Document analysis of the curriculum mapping process indicates that it served as a useful means to create structured opportunities for faculty to engage in developing well-defined clinical activities, along with tools that facilitate vertical and horizontal course activity sequencing.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
K-12 çevrelerinde müfredat uyumu yaratmak için kullanılan bir araç olan haritalama, teori ve pratiği birbirine bağlamada uygun bir araç olmasına rağmen, yüksek öğretim ortamlarında seyrek olarak uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, dört adet öğretmen eğitimi programının klinik deneyimleri arasında bir tutarlılık yaratmak için yeniden-araçlandırma dahilinde akademisyenlerce desteklenen müfredat haritalandırma yollarını rapor etmektedir. Müfredat haritalandırma aşamasının belge analizleri, bu haritalandırmanın, akademisyenler için yapılandırılmış fırsatların, gelişmekte olan iyi tanımlanmış klinik faaliyetlerine yatay ve dikey ders aktiveleri akışını geliştiren araçlar yoluyla entegre edilebilmesi için faydalı bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_173599_7_pp_247-258.pdf
  • 2
247-258
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. (2010). The clinical preparation of teachers: A policy brief. Washington, D.C.: AACTE. Retrieved from http://www.aacte.org/pdf/Government_Relations/ Clinical%20Prep%20Paper_03-11-2010.pdf.
Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 313-328.
Beck, C., & Kosnick, C. (2002). Professors and the practicum: Involvement of university faculty in preservice practicum supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 6-19.
Blanton, L. P., & Pugach, M. (2007). Collaborative programs in general and special teacher education: An action guide for higher education and
state policymakers. Washington, D.C.: Center for Improving Teacher Quality, Chief State School Officers.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Albany, NY: Teacher Policy Research, SUNY-Albany.
Cibulka, J. G. (2009). Meeting urgent national needs in P-12 education: Improving relevance, evidence, and performance in teacher preparation. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/public/062309_TeacherEdRequirements.asp
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Gabriel, R. (2010). The case for differentiated professional support: Toward a phase theory of teacher development. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4(1): 86-95.
Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved on June 18, 2009, from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf
Hardman, M. (2009). Redesigning the preparation of all teachers within the framework of an integrated program model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 583-587.
Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009). ―Intermediate theory‖ building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1753-1795.
Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Smith, E., & Evans, C. (2008). Providing effective mentoring for alternate route beginning teachers. The Teacher Educator, 43, 249-278.
Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 329-346.
Tierney, W. G. (1999). Faculty productivity and academic culture. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 39–54). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
Uchiyama, K. P., & Radin, J. L. (2009). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovations in Higher Education, 33, 271-280.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university- based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com