You are here

Home » Content

UYGULAMA VE ETİK DEĞERLENDİRMELER: GERÇEK VE BEKLENEN DAVRANIŞLAR ARASINDAKİ FARK

PRACTICUM AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: GAP BETWEEN ACTUAL AND DESIRED BEHAVIOURS

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Practice teaching or practicum is more directly concerned with values and ethical issues than any other educational activity. The motivation for this study comes from the assumption that students feel stress during the practicum sessions due to the unethical behavior of supervisors and cooperating institutions. What is the nature of ethics followed by supervisors and cooperating institutes during the practicum? What are the reasons behind the unethical behavior of supervisors? What are the significant ethics which supervisors and cooperating institutes have to follow during the practicum? These are the questions which have been tried to get answered in this research paper. Researchers selected five public universities of Punjab. All Student Teachers (STs) enrolled in Education departments of selected five universities were target population of the study. Out of this population researchers selected thirty six (36) students from each university, who had successfully completed practicum. The multiple data sources consisted of questionnaire for students comprised of open ended and close ended questions and in-depthinterviews with faculty supervisors and heads of cooperating institutions. The study analyzed the responses of students about ethical considerations of the Faculty Supervisors (FSs) and cooperating institutes. The results provide evidence that the reasons behind the unethical behavior of faculty supervisors and heads of cooperating institutes are non-existence of code of ethics, unawareness of responsibilities regarding practicum, conflict of interest, students‟ non-serious attitude, inconsistency in relationships, lack of diversity and non-availability of proper facilities for proper conduction of the practicum.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
ÖZ Öğretim uygulamaları ya da staj etkinlikleri lisans ve lisans sonrası ders müfredatlarından ziyade değerler ve etik konularla daha yakından ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmanın ortaya çıkmasına sebep olan varsayım, öğrencilerin uygulama süresince danışmanların ya da kurumların etik olmayan davranışlarından dolayı stres hissetmeleridir. Fakülte danışmanlarının ve koordinede bulunulan kurumların uygulama esnasında izlediği etikler nelerdir? Danışmanların etik olmayan davranışlarının altında yatan sebepler nelerdir? Danışmanların ve koordinede bulunulan kurumların uygulama esnasında takip etmesi gereken etik unsurlar nelerdir? Bunlar çalışmada cevapları bulunmaya çalışılmış sorulardır. Araştırmacılar Punjab'da 5 devlet üniversite si seçmişlerdir. Bu çalışmaya katılan tüm öğretmen öğrenciler çalışmanın evrenini oluşturmaktadır. Bu öğrencilerin dışından araştırmacılar her üniversiteden random olarak uygulamalarını başarı ile tamamlamış toplam 36 öğrenci seçmişlerdir.. Çalışma öğrenci, danışman ve kurumların etik görüşlerle ilgili cevaplarının bir analizidir. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde etik olmayan davranışların sebepleri şunlar olarak bulunmuştur; danışman ve kurum ciddi olmayan tutumları, ilişkilerdeki tutarsızlık, uygulamaların gerçekleşmesi için gerekli etkinliklerde farklılık eksikliği.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_173599_7_pp_230-246.pdf
  • 2
230-246
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bogo, M. & Vayda, E. (1998) The practice of field Instruction in social work: theory and proces., 2nd ed, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Callan, J. E. & Bucky, S. F. (2005). Ethics in the teaching of mental health professionals. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma,11(3),287-309
Campbell-Evans, G. & Maloney, C. (1997) An alternative practicum curriculum: exploring roles and relationships, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,25(1),35-52
Carter, D. (1999). Extending supervisory reach: using new information management technology in the teacher education practicum, Technology, Pedagogy and Education,8(3),321-333
Carter, D. (2005). Distributed practicum supervision in a managed learning environment (MLE),Teachers and Teaching,11(5),481-497
Clergy, W. & Ellen, C. F. (2001). A System of Value-based Ethics. City University Seattle, Washington.
CIDA, (2008). International Conference on “Transforming Teachers Education: Improving practicum and Internship. Organized by CIDA, (Canada Pakistan Basic education Program-CPBEP) and Higher Education Commission Pakistan. 26th -28th March, 2008, Lahore.
Crespi, T. D. & Lopez, P. G. (1999). Practicum and ınternship supervision in the schools. The Clinical Supervisor,17(2),113-126
Dayan, Y. (2008). Towards professionalism in early childhood practicum supervision - a personal journey, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal,16(2),153-170
Degago, A. T. (2007). Using reflective journals to enhance impoverished practicum placements: A case in teacher education in Ethiopia, Teaching Education,18 (4), 343-356
Gillam, S. L.& Crutchfield, L. B. (2001). Collaborative group supervision of practicum students and interns. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(1),49-60
Henderson, C. E., Cawyer, C. S.& Watkins Jr., C. E. (1999). A comparison of student and supervisor perceptions of effective practicum supervision. The Clinical Supervisor,18(1),47-74
Lee, K. V.(2007). Caesar‟s closure: terminating a practicum field experience, Reflective Practice,8(4),545-550.
Lee, R. W. & Cashwell, C. S.(2002). Ethical issues in counseling supervision, The Clinical Supervisor, 20(2), 91-100.
Loughran, J. J. (2002) Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching, Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
Martens, B. (2001), Website on computer ethics, supporting [Martens, 2000], accessed 7th June 2005 online http://www.khleuven.be/publicaties/elfdegebod.
Mau, R. Y. (1997). Concerns of student teachers: implications for improving the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25 (1), 53-66.
Miller, J. & Koerin, B. (2001). Gatekeeping in the practicum, The Clinical Supervisor, 20 (2), 1-18
Morton, L. L., Vesco, R., Williams, N. H., & Awender, M. A. (1997). Student teacher anxieties related to class management, pedagogy, evaluation, and staff relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 67, 69-89.
Ortlipp, M. (2003). The risk of voice in practicum assessment, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,31(3), 225- 237
Patterson, P. (1997). From the classroom to the courtroom: Ethics professors as expert witnesses, Journal of Mass Media Ethics,12(2),96-100
Santoro, N. (1997). The construction of teacher identity: an analysis of school practicum discourse, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,25(1), 91- 99
Sharpe, L., Moo, S., Crawford, L. and Goprnathan, S. (1994). Teacher supervision patterns and discourse. Singapore: National Institution of Education.
Smith, K. & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: the voice of the students, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302
Spooner-Lane, R.S., Tangen, D.J. and Campbell, M. A. (2009). The complexities of supporting Asian international pre-service teachers as they undertake practicum, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,37(1),79- 94
Tessema, K. A. (2008). An exploration for a critical practicum pedagogy: dialogical relationships and reflections among a group of student teachers, Educational Action Research, 16(3), 345-360
Turnbull, M. (2005). Student teacher professional agency in the practicum, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33(2),195-208
Usher, B. (2001) Discussion Paper. ATEA Conference- Teacher Education: Change of Heart, Mind and Action. 24-26 September 2001. Melbourne.
Vickers, M., Harris, C.& McCarthy, F. (2004). University-community engagement: exploring service-learning options within the practicum, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,32(2),129-141
Walsh, K. & Elmslie, L. (2005). Practicum pairs: an alternative for first field experience in early childhood teacher education, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33(1),5- 21

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com