You are here

Home » Content

Mükemmellik Sanatını Öğrenme: Nero Linguistik Programlamanın Öğretmenlere Düşünme ve Yeniden Programlama Açısından Sağlayabileceği Beceriler

GETTING TO KNOW THE ART OF EXCELLENCE: WHAT NEURO LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING CAN OFFER TO TEACHERS’ THINKING AND REPROGRAMMING SKILLS

Journal Name:

  • EKEV Akademi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Building on the strategies of thinking and reprogramming taken from Neuro Lingustic Programming (NLP), this article argues that it is possible for us to change our thought structures and reprogram ourselves in order to achieve the outcomes that we want for ourselves whether in a personal or a professional context. The article contends that the individual has the powers that they need in order to achieve their true potential. The article first presents a brief definition of NLP followed by brief background information on the origins of NLP. The discussion then turns to understanding the structure of thought and the strategy of reprogramming: establishing well‐formed criteria. Two techniques for establishing well‐formed criteria are proposed and discussed. The article ends with a conclusion summarizing the argument and making concluding suggestions for achieving our true potential.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, Nero Linguistik Programlama’dan (NLP) yola çıkarak, düşünce yapımızı değiştirerek ve kendimizi yeniden programlayarak istediğimiz amaçlara ulaşabileceğimizi iddia etmektedir. Makalenin temel aldığı inanç, bir bireyin kişisel veya mesleki bağlamda istediklerini gerçekleştirebilecek yeteneklere sahip olduğudur. Makale ilk olarak NLP’nin kısa bir tanımını ve nasıl ortaya çıktığını vermektedir. Bu kısa girişten sonra, düşüncenin yapısını anlatan ve yeniden programlamaya örnek bir strateji önerilmektedir. Bu strateji iyi biçimlenmiş amaçlardır. Bu bağlamda 2 teknik önerilmektedir: Son olarak da makalede anlatılmaya çalışılan teorinin özeti ve kendi potansiyelimizi gerçekleştirirken bize yardımcı olacak öneriler yer almaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_182912_14_pp_87-98.pdf
  • 44
87-98
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alder, H. (1999). Handbook of NLP: A manual for professional communicators.
Burlington: Gower.
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). The structure of magic (Vols. 1-2). Palo Alto; CA:
Science & Behaviour Books.
Charvet, S. R. (1997). Words that change minds: Mastering the language of influence.
Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Craft, A. (2001). “Neuro-linguistic Programming and learning theory”. The Curriculum
Journal, (12)1, 125 - 136.
Dilts, R. (1990). Beliefs: Pathways to Health and Well-being. Oregon, Portland:
Metamorphous Press.
Dilts, R. (1983). Applications of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Cupertino, CA: Meta
Publications.
Dilts, R. R., Epstein, T., & Dilts, R. W. (1991). Tools for dreamers: Strategies for
creativity and the structure of innovation. Capitola, CA: Meta Publications.
Dixon, P. N., Parr, G. D., Yarbrough, D., & Rathael, M. (1986). “Neurolinguistic
programming as a persuasive communication technique”. The Journal of Social
Psychology, 126(4), 545 - 550.
Garratt, T. (1999). The effective delivery of training using NLP. London: Kogan Page.
Gawain, S. (1995). Creative visualization. Novato, CA: Nataraj.
Gül Peker, B. (2010). “A Study of Emotion in Turkish Teacher Education: Task
Appraisal Styles”. Education and Science, 35(157), in press.
Hamilton, R. (2003). “The NLP spelling strategy: Teaching students to spell”. Modern
English Teacher, 12(1), 38-43.
Hannaford, C. (1995). Smart moves: Why all Learning is not in Your Head. Arlington,
Virginia: Great Ocean.
Knight, S. (2005). NLP at Work: The Difference that Makes a Difference in Business.
London: Nicolas Brealey.
Konefal, J., & Duncan, R. C. (1998). “Social anxiety and training in Neurolinguistic
programming”. Psychological Reports, 83, 1115 - 1122.
Laborde, G. Z. (1995). Influencing with integrity: Management skills for
communication and negotiation. CA: The Anglo American Book Company.
Millrood, R. (2004). “The role of NLP in Teachers’ Classroom Discourse”. ELT
Journal, 58(1), 28 - 37.
98 / Yrd. Doç. Dr. Bena Gül PEKER EKEV AKADEMİ DERGİSİ
OConnor, J. (1998). Leading with NLP: Essential leadership skills for influencing and
managing people. London: Thorsons.
Puchta, H. (1999). “Creating a learning culture to which students want to belong: the
application of Neuro-Linguistic Programming”. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in
language learning (pp. 28- 42). Cambridge University Press.
Revell, J., & Norman, S. (1997). In your hands: NLP in ELT. London: Saffire Press.
Revell, J., & Norman, S. (1999). Handing over: NLP-based activities for language
learning. London: Saffire Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language
teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, A. (2001). Awaken the giant within. London: Simon and Schuster.
Roderique-Davies, G. (2009). “Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Cargo cult
psychology?”. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, (1)2, 58-63.
Skinner, H., & Stephens, P. (2003). “Speaking the same language: The relevance of
neuro-linguistic programming to effective marketing communications”. Journal of
Marketing Communication, 9, 178 - 192.
Sıvananda Yoga Vedenta Center. (1998). Yoga mind and body. Dorling Kindersley,
London.
Tomlinson, H. (2004). “Neurolinguistic programming and professional development:
Improving communication skills”. In Educational leadership: Personal growth for
professional development (pp. 53 - 63). London: Sage.
Tosey, P. (2010). Neuro-linguistic Programming for Leaders and Managers.
.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com