You are here

Vergi Mükelleflerine Daha Fazla Belirlilik İçin Özelge Uygulaması

Application of Advance Rulings to Provide More Certainty for Taxpayers

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Becomes increasingly complex tax legislation, taxpayers in the face for them to feel secure are more certainty search. Lack of certainty leads to increased compliance costs.Taxpayers requires a good understanding of the taxation law to fulfill their taxation obligations. Most countries use advance ruling system to provide more certainty for taxpayers, especially at future transaction. In Most Countries, Advance rulings have binding effect on administration, taxpayers and courts this is the most valuable characteristic of advance ruling system In this study, I explain advance ruling application of some countries . After try to determine insufficiency of Turkish advance ruling system, we made suggestions for improvement of the Turkish Advance Ruling system were introduced.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Mükellefler giderek karmasik hale gelen vergi mevzuati karsisinda kendilerini güvencede hissetmek için daha fazla belirlilik aramaktadirlar. Belirliliginin az olmasi uyum maliyetini artirmaktadir. Mükellefler vergi ile ilgili ödevlerini yerine getirmek için vergi kanunlarini iyi anlamak zorundadirlar. Ülkelerin çogu mükelleflere, özelikle gelecekte yapacaklari islemlerle ilgili belirlilik saglamak amaciyla özelge sitemini uygulamaktadirlar. Bu özelge sisteminin en önemli özelligidir. Bu çalismada bazi ülkelerdeki özelge uygulamalarinin nitelikleri açiklandiktan sonra, Türkiye'deki özelge sisteminin eksiklikleri belirlenmeye çalisilmis ve sistemin iyilestirilmesi için öneriler getirilmistir.
171-187

REFERENCES

References: 

Betten, Rijkale (1999), Under-Minister of Finance Publishes Details on Non-Standard Rulings,
European Taxation, Amsterdam, IBFD, 355-357.
Chan, Vinnie (1997), Binding Rulings, Fiscal Studies Vol.18(2), 189-210.
Doğrusöz, Bumin (2005), “Özelge ve Düşündürdükleri”, Dünya, 26 Eylül Pazartesi.
Fransberg Eva (2002), The Swedish Advance Tax Ruling Regime.
Holden, James P., Novey , Michaels S. (1984), “Legimate Uses of Letter Rulings Issued to Other
Taxpayers- a Reply to Gerald Portney”, Tax Lawyer, Vol 37(2), 337-357.
Huiskes, Theodoor (1995), Netherlands Ruling Policy Revised, European Taxation, July 1995,
Amsterdam, IBFD, 237-239.
Haris, Peter A. (1994), “Private Tax Rulings: An Advanced System”, Australian Tax Review, Mar
1994;23(1), 22-36.
Morino, Giuseppe (1992), “Finance Act 1992 Introduces a Right to Consultation Procedure”,
Eupean Taxation, March, IBFD, 94-96.
Özbudak, Mehmet (1996), “Vergi idaresinden Yazılı Görüş (Özelge) İsteme”, Yaklaşım, S. 39.
Portney, G. Gerald (1983), “Letter Rulings: An Endangered Species ?”, Tax Lawyer; Vol 36(3), 751-
758.
Romano, Carlo (2002), Advance Tax Ruling and Principle of Law, Towards a European Tax Ruling
System?, Amsterdam, IBFD.
Romano, Carlo (2001), “Private Ruling Systems in EU Member States A Comparative Survey”,
European Taxation, January 2001, Amsterdam, IBFD, 18-30.
Russo; Antonio (2001), “Italy New Advance Ruling Regime”, European Taxation, October 2001,
Amsterdam, IBFD, 399-403.
Sandler, Daniel (1997), International Guide to Advance Ruling, Amsterdam, IBDF.
Sugarman A, Norman, (1955), “Federal Tax Ruling Procedure”, Tax Law Review 11,1-40.
Tanrıkulu, Lütfü (1995), “Özelgeler ( Muktezalar ) Üzerine...”, Vergi Dünyası, S. 163.
Zelenak, Lawrence (1985), “Should Courts Require The Internal Revenue Service to be
Consistent?”, Tax Law Review, 411-448.
Wenchel, J.P. (1950), “Taxpayers’ Ruling”, Tax Law Rev.(5) 105-118.
Wheelwright Karen, (1998), Taxpayer’s Rights in Australia, Taxpayers’ Rights, Ed. Duncan Bentley,
Adelaide, Hyde Park Press, 57-88.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com