You are here

Psikoloji ve İktisadın Birleşimi Olarak,Davranışsal İktisat

Behavioral Economics, as a Combination of Psychology and Economics

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper analyzes the literature on the interaction between psychology and economics. The relationship between these two disciplines has been once again on the agenda lately, as economists have started to use psychological literature in their work. Previously, with the neoclassical theory being the dominant view in the economics literature, economic models ignored psychological factors and treated human beings as purely rational decision makers. But this has begun to change. Behavioral economics has emerged as an interdisciplinary science and developed quickly in recent years. In this paper conceptual dimension of the collaboration of psychology and economics as well as the historical relationship between these two disciplines are examined. And then the methodology of behavioral economics is discussed.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada psikoloji ve iktisat arasındaki etkileşim ile ilgili literatür incelenmiştir. Her iki disiplin arasındaki ilişki, bilim tarihinin tekrarlanan konusu olup, son zamanlarda iki alan arasındaki etkileşim iktisatçıların psikoloji biliminden yararlanmaları üzerine yeniden gündeme gelmiştir. Böylece önceleri neoklasik teorinin iktisat yazınında hakimiyetini arttırmasıyla, psikolojik faktörleri göz ardı eden ve insanı sadece akılcı kararlar alan rasyonel varlıklar olarak ele alan modellerin yapısı, değişmeye başlamıştır. Bu çerçevede, disiplinler arası çalışma alanı olarak davranışsal iktisat ortaya çıkmış ve son dönemlerde hızla gelişmiştir. Bu çalışmada iktisat‐psikoloji ilişkisinin tarihsel geçmişi ile iktisat ve psikoloji ortaklığının kavramsal boyutu incelenmekte ve davranışsal iktisadın yöntemlerine değinilmektedir.
287‐321

REFERENCES

References: 

Acar, G. T. (2005), “Tarihsel Koşullar Açısından Neoklasik İktisadın Ortaya Çıkış
Süreci, http://www.ceterisparibus.net/dusunce/diger.htm, (Erişim: 05.11.2009).
Akerlof, G. A. (1982), “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange,” Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 97(4), 543‐569.
Akerlof, G. A. (1984), “Gift Exchange and Efficiency‐Wage Theory: Four Views”,
The American Economic Review, 74(2), 79‐83.
Akerlof, G A. (2002), “Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior”,
The American Economic Review, 92(3), 411‐433.
Akın, Z. ve B. Urhan (2010), “İktisat Deneysel Bilim Olmaya Mı Başlıyor?”, İktisat
İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 25(288), 9‐28.
Aksoy, T ve I. Şahin (2009), “Belirsizlik Altında Karar Alma: Geleneksel ve Modern
Yaklaşımlar”, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Tartışma Metni, No: 2009/7.
Akyıldız, H. (2006), “Freud’çu Liberal ve Marksist Kişilik Kuramlarının Türevi Olarak
Toplum, İktisat ve Siyaset Teorileri”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 11, 1‐23.
Andromidas, D. (2009), “Behavioral Economics in Europe: Who’s Who” Executive
Intelligent Review, 36(19), 32‐34.
Angner, E. ve G. Loewenstein (2006), “Behavioral Economics”,
http://sds.hss.cmu.edu/media/pdfs/loewenstein/BehavioralEconomics.pdf,
(Erişim: 23.12.2009).
Asso, P. F. ve L. Fiorito (2004), “Human Nature and Economic Institutions: Instinct
Psychology, Behaviorism, and the Development of American Institutionalism”,
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(4), 445‐477.
Batson, C. D. (2006), “Not All Self‐Interest After All: Economics of Empathy‐
Induced Altruism”, Ed. David De Cremer, Marcel Zeelenberg ve J. Keith
Murnighan, Social Psychology and Economics, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers, 281‐299.
Bazerman, M. H. ve D. Malhotra (2006), “Economics Wins, Psychology Loses, and
Society Pays”, Ed. David De Cremer, Marcel Zeelenberg ve J. Keith Murnighan,
Social Psychology and Economics, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers, 263‐280.
Bianchi, M. (2003), “A Questioning Economist: Tibor Scitovsky’s Attempt to Bring
Joy into Economics”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(3), 391‐407.
Bruni, L. ve R. Sugden (2007), “The Road not Taken: How Psychology was
Removed from Economics and How It Might Be Brought Back”, The Economic
Journal, 117(1), 146‐173.
Camerer, C. F. (1999a), “Behavioral Economics”, CSWEP Newsletter Winter,
http://www.cswep.org/camerer.html, (Erişim: 26.05.2010).
Camerer, C. F. (1999b), “Behavioral Economics: Reunifying Psychology and
Economics”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 96(19),
10575‐10577.
Camerer, C. F. ve G. Loewenstein (2004), “Behavioral Economics: Past, Present,
Future”, Editors: Colin F. Camerer, George Loewenstein ve Matthew Rabin,
Advances in Behavioral Economics, New York: Princeton University Pres.
Croson, R. (2005), “The Method of Experimental Economics”, International
Negotiation 10: 131–148.
Croson, R. (2006), “Contrasting Methods and Comparative Findings in Psychology
and Economics”, Ed. David De Cremer, Marcel Zeelenberg ve J. Keith Murnighan,
Social Psychology and Economics, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers, 301‐317.
Duffy, J. (2008), “Macroeconomics: A Survey of Laboratory Research”,
http://www.pitt.edu/~jduffy/papers/hee11.pdf, (Erişim: 18.09.2010).
Durusoy, S. (2008), “İktisat Biliminin Yeri ve Yöntemi Neden Sorgulanıyor?”,
Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1‐26.
Earl, P. E. (2005), “Economics and Psychology in the Twenty‐Century”, Cambridge
Journal of Economics 29(6), 909‐926.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974), “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some
Empirical Evidence”, Ed. Paul A. David ve M. W. Reder, Nations and Households in
Economic Growth: Essay in Honor of Moses Abramowitz, New York and London:
Academic Press, 89‐125.
Epley, N., D. Mak ve L. C. Idson (2006), “Bonus of Rebate?: The Impact of Income
Framing on Spending and Saving”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(3),
213–227.
Fehr, E. ve K. M. Schmidt (1999), “A Theory of Fairness, Competition and
Cooperation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817‐868.
Fehr, E. ve S. Gachter (2000), “Fairness and Relation: The Economics of
Reciprocity”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159‐181.
Foote, C. L., L. Goette ve S. Meier (2009), “Behavioral Economics: Its Prospects
and Promises for Policymakers”, Ed. Christopher L. Foote, Lorenz Goette, and
Stephan Meier, Policymaking Insights from Behavioral Economics, Boston: Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston, 3‐47.
Frey, B. S. ve M. Benz (2002), “From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of
Economics and Psychology”, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics,
University of Zurich Working Paper Series, No: 118.
Hanedar, A. Ö. (2007), “İktisat Bilimi ve Metodolojik Bir Sınama: Nitel ve Nicel
Teknikler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Dokuz Eylül
Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Galeotti F. ve A. Karakostas (2010), “The Promise of Behavioral Economics”,
http://www.uea.ac.uk/eco/essays/volume1/Fabio+the+promise+of, (Erişim:
02.10.2010).
Gowdy, J. M. (2008), “Behavioral Economics and Climate Change Policy", Journal
of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 68, 632‐644.
Kahneman, D. (2003), “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral
Economics”, The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449‐1475.
Kahneman, D. ve A. Twersky (1973), “On the Psychology of Prediction”
Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–51.
Kahneman, D. ve A. Twersky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision
under Risk”, Econometrica 47(2), 263‐291.
Katona G. (1949), “Effect of Income Changes on the Rate of Saving”, the Review of
Economics and Statistics, 31(2), 95‐103.
Katona G. (1951), Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior, New York: Mc
Graw Hill.
Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,
London: Macmillan (reprinted 2007).
Koopmans, T. C. (1960), “Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience",
Econometrica, 28(2), 287‐309.
Laibson, D. (1996), “Hyperbolic Discount Functions, Undersaving and Saving
Plans”, NBER Working Papers, No: 5635.
Leibenstein, H. (1966), “Allocative Efficiency vs. X‐Efficiency", The American
Economic Review, 56(3), 392‐415.
Lewin, S. B. (1996), “Economics and Psychology: Lessons for Our Own Day from
the Early Twentieth Century”, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(10), 1293‐1323.
Loewenstein, G. (1999), “Experimental Economics from the Vantage‐Point of
Behavioral Economics”, The Economic Journal, 109(453), F25‐F34.
Matsuyama, N. (2009), “Relativity of Alfred Marshall’s Psychological Research and
Economics”, http://room409‐1.ih.otaru‐uc.ac.jp/~yss2009/papers/Matsuyama%
2020090325. pdf, (Erişim: 14.05.2010).
McDonald, I. (2005), “Some Policy Implications of Behavioral Economics:
Introduction”, The Australian Economic Review, 38(3), 282‐284.
Mises, L. (2008), İnsan Eylemi, İktisat Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Çev.: İ. Aktar, Ankara:
Liberte Yayınları.
NİSAN 2011 319
O’Donoghue,T. ve M. Rabin (1999), “Incentives for Procrastinators”, The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 769‐816.
Otto, A. M. C. (2009), “The Economic Psychology of Adolescent Saving”, University
of Exeter Doktora Tezi,
http://eric.exeter.ac.uk/exeter/bitstream/10036/83873/3/OttoA.pdf, (Erişim:
10.12.2009).
Önder, İ. (2004), “İktisat ve Psikoloji İlişkisi Üzerine”, İktisat Dergisi, 463(9), 53‐58.
Özen, A. (2004), “Yürekten Bağlılık: Nereye Kadar?”, Pivolka, 3(14), 15‐17.
Pesendorfer, W. (2006), “Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on
Advances in Behavioral Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 712‐
721.
Poterba, J. M. (2009), “Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the
Past and Lessons for the Future”, Ed. Christopher L. Foote, Lorenz Goette, and
Stephan Meier, Policymaking Insights from Behavioral Economics, Boston: Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston, 369‐377.
Rabin M. (1998), “Psychology and Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature,
36(3), 11‐46.
Rabin M. (2002), “A Perspective on Psychology and Economics”, European
Economic Review, 46(4–5), 657–85.
Ricciuti, R. (2002), “Bringing Macroeconomics into the Lab”, University of Siena
Economics Working Paper, No. 374.
Rosenau, P. V. (2005), “Is Economic Theory Wrong about Human”, Journal of
Economic and Social Policy, 10(2), 61‐77.
Schabas, M. (2005), The Natural Origins of Economics, Chicago/London: The
Chicago University Press.
Scitovsky, T. (1976). The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction,
Oxford: Oxford University Press, (revised edition 1992).
Samuelson, P. (1937), “A Note on Measurement of Utility", Review of Economic
Studies, 4(2), 155‐161.
Sent, E. M. (2004), “Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited)
Way Back Into Economics”, History of Political Economy, 36(4), 735‐760.
Shefrin, H. M. ve R. H. Thaler (1988), “The Behavioral Life‐Cycle Hypothesis”,
Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609‐603.
Shefrin, H. M. ve R. H. Thaler (1992), “Mental Accounting, Saving, and Selfcontrol”,
Ed. G. Loewenstein ve J. Elster, Choice over Time, New York, Russell Sage
Foundation, 287‐330.
Shostak, F. (2002), Davranışsal İktisat, Deneysel İktisat ve Avusturya İktisadı, Çev.:
Atilla Yayla,” http://www.ekodialog.com/makaleler/davranissal‐iktisat‐denyseliktisat.
html, (Erişim: 27.11.2009).
Simon, H. (1955), “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 69(1), 99‐118.
Tarde, G. (2004), Ekonomik Psikoloji, Çev: Özcan Doğan, İstanbul: Öteki Yayınevi.
Taşdemir, M. (2006), “Dinamik Genel Denge Modellerinde Zamanlararası
Tercihler: İndirgenmiş Fayda Teorisi ve Yetersizlikleri”, SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik
Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(12), 115‐129.
Thaler, R. H. (1980), “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice”, Journal of
Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39‐60.
Thaler R. H. (1981), “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency”
Economics Letters, 8(3), 201‐207.
Thaler, R. H. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice”, Science, 4(3),
199‐214.
Thaler, R. H. (1997), “Irving Fisher: Modern Behavioral Economist”, The American
Economic Review, 87(2), 439‐441.Thaler, R. ve S. Benartzi (2004), “Save More Tomorrow (TM): Using Behavioral
Economics to Increase Employee Saving", Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1),
S164‐S187.
Tomer, J. F. (2007), “What is Behavioral Economics?”, The Journal of Socio‐
Economics, 36(3), 463‐479.
Tversky, A. ve D. Kahneman (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology
of Choice”, Science 21(1), 453‐458.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974), “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and
Biases” Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Tversky, A. ve D. Kahneman (1986), “Rational Choice and the Framing of
Decisions.” Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992), “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative
Representation of Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
Yellen, J. L. (2009), “Implications of Behavioral Economics for Monetary Policy”,
Ed. Christopher L. Foote, Lorenz Goette, and Stephan Meier, Policymaking Insights
from Behavioral Economics, Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 379‐393.
Zafiroski, M. (2001), “Max Weber’s Analysis of Marginal Utility Theory and
Psychology Revisited: Latent Propositions in Economic Sociology and the Sociology
of Economic”, History of Political Economy, 33(3), 437‐458.
Zwick, R., I. Erev ve D. Budescu (1999), “The Psychological and Economical Perspective
on Human Decisions in Social and Interactive Contexts”, Ed. Rami Zwick,
Ido Erev ve David Budescu, Games and Human Behavior: Essay in Honor of Ammon
Rapoport, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 3‐20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com