You are here

Home » Content

Post-Truth Döneminde Epikuros’ta Mutluluk ve Dostluk Kavramlarını Yeniden Düşünmek

Rethinking Happiness and Friendship Concepts of Epicurus at Post-Truth Era

Journal Name:

  • Fiscaoeconomia

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Epicurus would like to investigate the man and his Nature against the thought of conventional Ancient World. It was an era of a transition which the cultures and places has converged each other and collapsing the Ancient thought. The searching of new world in Epicurean thought is based on the concepts like to be free from the pain and to reach the pleasure and friendship as an end. The aim was to protect and rethink the physical and mental situation of person in the disturbing process of new political era. In order to this aim he had imagined to make a new community based on friendship to reach the tranquility. The politics which he refused is the traditional way of Ancient thought and also established way of his era. In this context Epicurus give some clues to find an exit of today’s unstable and disturbing post-truth discussions in rethinking the individual, pleasure and friendship.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yeni kültürlerin ve yerlerin birbiriyle temas kurmasıyla evrensel olana dair eski tespitlerin değiştiği bir geçiş döneminde Epiküros bireyi yeniden keşfetmek istemiştir. Acıdan uzak durma ve bir amaç olarak haz ve dostluk kavramlarıyla Epiküros’un kurmaya çalıştığı yeni dünya, döneminin dalgalanmalarından ve kargaşasından bireyi uzak tutma ve kendini bulma arayışıydı. Epiküros’un farkı bu pratiklerin merkezine bireyin duyumlarını alması, ancak bu duyumların tek başına bir kurtuluşu değil mutluluk verici bir topluluk ilişkisi içinde temkinli ve dingin bir düzeni kurmak fikrini desteklemesidir. Reddettiği siyaset ise geleneksel ve o dönem için yerleşik olan türden olan siyasettir. Bu açıdan Epiküros, bugün hakikatin ne olduğunun yeniden tartışıldığı ve manipülatif yönlendirmelere açık olduğu bir geçiş döneminde yeni çıkış/kaçış arayışları için imkanlar sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-post-truth-doneminde-epikurosta-mutluluk-dostluk-kavramlarini-yeniden-dusunmek.pdf
  • 3
108
125
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Ağaoğulları, Mehmet Ali (2006) Kent Devletinden İmparatorluğa, Ankara: İmge Yayınları.
Brown, Eric (2009) “Politics and Society”, The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed.: James Warren, Cambridge Press.
Davies, William (2016) “The Age of Post-Truth Politics”, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-pos... , 24.08.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
De Witt, Norman W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Dunt, Ian (2016), “Post-truth politics is driving us mad”, http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/06/29/post-truth-politics-is-drivin... , 29.06.2016, Erişim: 10.04.2017.
Eagleton, Terry (2016) Materialism, New Haven: Yale University Press.
en.oxforddictionaries.com (2016) “Word of the Year 2016 is…”, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016, Erişim: 09.04.2017.
Erler, Michael (2011) “Autoditact and Student: On the Relationship of Authority and Autonomy in Epicurus and Epicurean Tradition”, Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, eds: Jeffrey Fish, Kirk R. Sanders, New York: Cambridge University Press.
YILDIRIM, Y., (2017), “Post-Truth Döneminde Epikuros’ta Mutluluk ve Dostluk Kavramlarını Yeniden Düşünmek”,
Fiscaoeconomia, Vol.1(3), 108-125.
124
Fletcher, Richard (2012) “Epicurus’s Mistresses: Pleasure, Authority and the Gender in the Reception of Kuriai Doxai in the Second Sophistic”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 52-89.
Gigandet, Alain (2012) “Epicurean Presences in Foucault’s the Hermeneutics of the Subject”, Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, Eds.: Brooke Holmes, W. H. Shearin, Oxford University Press, s. 303-316.
Gökberk, Macit (1996) Felsefe Tarihi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Hammer, Dean (2014) Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine, Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, J. S. (1996) A History of Western Political Thought, London: Routledge.
McGushin, Edward F. (2007) Foucault's Askesis: An Introduction to the Philosophical Life, Northwestern University Press.
Nelson, Brian (2015) Western Political Thought: From Socrates to the Age of Ideology, Waveland Press.
O’Keefe, Tim (2005) Epicurus on Freedom, New York: Cambridge University Press.
O'Keefe, Tim (2010) Epicureanism, New York: Routledge.
Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
Russell, Bertrand (1969) Batı Felsefesi Tarihi, İstanbul: Kitaş Yayınları.
Sabine ,George (1966) Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi Cilt 1, Sevinç Matbaası.
Schofield, Malcolm (2000) “Epicureanism”, The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, Eds.: Christopher Rowe, Malcolm Schofield, s. 437-439.
YILDIRIM, Y., (2017), “Post-Truth Döneminde Epikuros’ta Mutluluk ve Dostluk Kavramlarını Yeniden Düşünmek”,
Fiscaoeconomia, Vol.1(3), 108-125.
125
Sharma, Urmila; Sharma, S.K. (2006) Western Political Thought, New Delhi: Atlantic Publisher.
Smith, G. W. (1999) “Sinful Science? Marx’s Theory of Freedom from Thesis to Theses”, Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought-Critical Assessments, Eds.: Bob Jessop, Russell Wheatley, s. 392-410.
Wilson, Catherine (2015) Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com