You are here

Isı ve Sıcaklık Konusunda Kavram Yanılgıları

The Misconceptions about Heat and Temperature

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was carried out to identify the misconceptionsabout heat and temperature. For this purpose, a conceptual test on heat and temperature was developed. This test was given to 1017 high school and university students. All the students were taught heat and temperature subjects. As a result of the analysis of the collected data, some misconceptions shared by students about heat and temperature have been determined.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma, ısıve sıcaklık konusundaki kavram yanılgılarınıortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ısıve sıcaklık kavram testi geliştirilmiştir. Bu test, 2001-2002 ve 2002-2003 eğitim-öğretim yılında, ısıve sıcaklık konusunu almış olan lise ve üniversitelerde öğrenim gören 1017 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Uygulamalardan elde elden verilerin analizi sonucu, öğrencilerin ısıve sıcaklık konusunda paylaştıklarıkavram yanılgılarıbelirlenmiştir.
111-124

REFERENCES

References: 

Aguirre, J. (1988). Student preconceptions about vector kinematics. The Physics
Teacher.26, 212-216.
Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M. and Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in 'sophisticated'
subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of motion. Cognition, 9, 117-123
Eryılmaz, A. ve Tatlı, A. (1999). ODTÜ Öğrencilerinin Mekanik Konusundaki Kavram
Yanılgıları. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu. M. E. B. ÖYGM
Gülçiçek, Ç. (2002). Lise 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Mekanik Enerjinin Korunumu
Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgıları.YayınlanmışYüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi
Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Jacobs, G. (1989). Word usage misconceptions among first-year university physics
students. International Journal of Science Education. 11, 395 – 399
Kaptan, F. (1999). Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi. İstanbul: M.E.Basımevi
Linder, C. J. (1993). A Challenge to Conceptual Change. Science Education.77, 293 –
300
Marioni, C. (1989). Aspect of Srudent’s Understanding in Classroom Setting: Case
Studies on Motion and Intertia. Physics Education. 24, 273 – 277
Osborne, R. ve Gilbert, J. (1980) A technique for exploring students’ views of the
world. Physics Education.15, 376 - 379
References For Misconceptions in Physics.(Revised July 9, 1998).

Riche, R. D. (2000). Strategies for Assisting Students Overcome Their Misconceptions in
High School Physics. Memorial University of Newfoundland Education. 6390
Rowell, A. J., Dawson, C. J. ve Harry, L.(1990). Changing Misconceptions: a challenge
to science education. International Journal Science Education.12, 2, 167-175
Solomon, J. (1984). Alternative views of energy. Physics Education.19, 56.
Stepans, J. (1996). Targeting Students’ Science Misconceptions: Physical Science
Concepts Useing the Conceptual Chance Moldel. Riverview, Fla. : Idea
Factory
G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 23, Sayı2 (2003) 111-124 124
Tao, P. K. ve Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The Process of Conceptual Chance in Force and
Motion During Computer Supported physics Intructions. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching.(36), 859 – 882
Terry, C. Jones, G. ve Hurford, W. (1985). Children’s Conceptual understanding of
Forces and Equilibrium.Physics Education.20, 162 – 165
Tytler, R. (1998). The Nature of Students’ Informal Science Conceptions. International
Jornal of Science Educetion.20, (8), 901 – 927
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. ve Novak, J., D. (1994). Reserch on Alternative
Conceptions in Science in Gabel. Dorothy J. Handbook of Research on
Science Teaching and Learning.New York: MacMillan.
Watts, D. M. (1982). Gravity-don’t take it for granted!. Physics Education. 17, 116-121.
Wright, E. L. ve Perna, J. A. (1992). Reaching for Excellence: A Template for Biology
Instruction. Science & Children.30 (2), s. 35
YÖK/Dünya Bankası. (1997). Fizik Öğretimi.Ankara: Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com