Kimyadaki Bazı Yaygın Yanlış Kavramalar

Ayas, A., Çepni, S., Jhonson D. ve Turgut, M.F. (1997). Kimya Öğretimi. YÖK/Dünya
BankasıMillî Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi, Ankara.
Carr, M. (1984). Model Confusion in Chemistry. Research in Science Education, 14,
97-103.
Case, J.M. and Fraser, D.M. (1999). An Investigation İnto Chemical Engineering
Students’ Understanding of Mole and The Use of Concrete Activities To
Promote Conceptual Change. International Journal of Science Education,
21(12), 1237-1249.
Davis, N.T., McCarty, B.J., Shaw K.L. and Tabba, A.S. (1993). Transitions From
Objectivism to Constructivism in Science Education. International Journal of
Science Education. 15(6), 627-636.
Doymuş, K., Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S. ve Gürses, A. (1998).
Üniversite Kimya Bölümü Öğrencilerinin BazıKimya KavramlarınıAnlama
Düzeyleri. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu.K.T.Ü., Trabzon.
Gabel, D. (1993). Use of The ParticleOf Matter in Developing Conceptual
Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education. 70(3), 193-194.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı1 (2004) 135-146 145
Gabel, D.L., Samuel K.V. and Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding The Particulate Nature
of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education64(8), 695-697.
Garnett, P.J., and Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior
High School Students in Electrochemistry: Electric Currents and Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29, 121-142.
Garnett, P.J., and Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior
High School Students In Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and
Electrolytic Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29, 1079-1099.
Garnett, P.J., Garnett P.J. and Hackling, M.W. (1995). Students’ Alternative
Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications For
Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education.25, 69-95.
Gilbert, J.K., Osborne R.J. andPensham, P.J. (1982) Children’s Science and Its
Cosequences For Teaching. Science Education. 66, 623-633.
Griffiths A.K. and Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 Students’ Misconceptions Relating
To Fundamental Characteristics of atoms and Molecules. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching. 29(6), 611-628.
Haidar, A.H., and Abraham, M.R. (1991). A Comparison of Applied and Theoretical
Knowledge of Concepts Based on The Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching.28(10), 919-938.
Hein, G.E. (1991). Constructivist Learning Theory, The Museum and the Needs of
People. CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators), Conference
Jerusalem Israel, Leseley College. Massachusetts, USA.
Hesse, J.J. and Anderson, C.W. (1992). Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Change.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(3), 277-299.
Hibbard, K.M. and Novak, J.D. (1975). Audio-Tutorial Elementary School Science
Instruction as A Method For Study of Children’s Concept Learning:
Particulate Nature of Matter.Science Education.59(4), 559-570.
Janiuk, R.M. (1993). The Process of Learning Chemistry, A Review of the Studies.
Journal of Chemical Education. 70(10), 828-829.
Johnson, P. (1998). Progression in Children’s Understanding of A Basic Particulate
Theory: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Science Education.
20(4), 393-412.
Kokkotas, P. and Vlachos, I. (1998). Teaching The Topic of The Particulate Nature of
Matter in Prospective Teachers’ Training Courses. International Journal of
Science Education. 20(3), 291-303.
Lee, O., Eichinger, D.C., Anderson, C.W., Berkheimer G.D. and Blakeslee, T.D.
(1993). Changing Middle School Students’ Conceptions of Matter and
Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30(3), 249-270.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı1 (2004) 135-146 146
Martin, D.J. (1997). Elementary Science Methods, A Constructivist Approach. By
Delmar Publishers, New York.
Maskill, R., Cachapuz, F.C. and Koulaidis, V. (1997). Young Pupils’ Ideas About The
Microscopic Nature of Matter in Three Different European Countries.
International Journal of Science Education. 19(6), 631-645.
Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry. Journal of
Chemical Education. 69(3), 191-196.
Novick, S. and Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior High School Pupils’ Understanding of the
Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study. Science Education. 62(3),
273-281.
Renstrom, L., Anderson B. and Marton, F. (1990). Students’ Conceptions of Matter.
Journal of Educational Psychology. 82, 555-569.
Sanger, M.J. and Greenbowe, T.J. (1999). AnAnalysis of College Chemistry Textbooks
as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry. Journal of
Chemical Education.76(6), 853-860.
Sanger, M.J., and Greenbowe, T.J. (1997). Students’ Misconceptions in
Electrochemistry: Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and The Salt Bridge.
Journal of Chemical Education.74(7), 819-823.
Schmidt, H.J. (1997). Students’ Misconceptions-Looking for a Pattern. Science
Education.81, 123-135.
Shiland T.W. (1999). Construtivism: The Implications For Laboratory Work. Journal of
Chemical Education.76(1), 107-109.
Smith, K.J. and Metz, P.A. (1996). Evaluating student Understanding of Solution
Chemistry Through Microscopic Representations. Journal of Chemical
Education.73(3), 233-235.
Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and Use ofDiagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’
Misconceptions in Science.International Journal of Science Education.
10(9), 159-169.
Zoller, U. (1990). Students’ Misundestanding and Misconceptions in College Freshman
Chemistry (General and Organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
27(10), 1053-1065.