You are here

Home » Content

Cinsiyet ve Öğrenme Stilinin Gezinme Stratejisi ve Başarıya Etkisi

The Effects of Gender and Learning Style on Navigation Strategy and Achievement

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the effects of navigation strategy, gender and learning style on achievement is examined. Also, whether navigation strategy is changed or not by the effects of gender and learning style is determined. For this purpose, an internet based learning environment was designed and the student activities were recorded into the database and then these recordings were examined. As a result of the study, it is concluded that students’ achievements are not effected by gender, learning style and navigation strategy , and that navigation strategy does not differ significantly in relation to the learnnig style and gender.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin gezinme stratejisi, cinsiyet ve öğrenme stillerinin başarıya etkisi incelenmiştir. Ayrıca gezinme stratejisinin öğrenme stili ve cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığıda belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, bir internet ortamı tasarlanmışve öğrencilerin site içinde gerçekleştirdikleri etkinlikler veri tabanında tutulmuşve daha sonra bu kayıtlar incelenmiştir. Başarının öğrencilerin cinsiyet, öğrenme stili ve gezinme stratejilerine bağlıolarak değişmediği, gezinme stratejisinin öğrenme stili ve cinsiyete göre anlamlıfarklılık göstermediği sonucuna varılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cinsiyet-ogrenme-stilinin-gezinme-stratejisi-basariya-etkisi.pdf
  • 3
129-146
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Andris, J. F. (1996).The relationship of indices of student navigational patterns in a
hypermedia geology lab simulation to two measures of learning style.
Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10,(3), 227-251.
Aşkar, P. ve Akkoyunlu, B. (1993) Kolb Öğrenme Stili Envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, (87)
s:37-47.
Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal
of Research on Computing in Education, 28, (4), 500-576.
Altun, A. (2000). Patterns in cognitive process and strategies in hypertext reading: A
case study of two experienced computer users. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, (1), 35-55.
Berenfeld, B. (1996). Linking students to the infosphere. T.H.E. Journal, 96(4). 76-83.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı3 (2004) 129-146 145
Chen, S. Y. & Macredie, R. D. (2001). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation:
Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 53, (1), 3-15. Wiley Interscience
Veritabanı.
De Bra, P., Houben, G. & Kornatzky, Y. (1992). Information retrival in distrubuted
hypertetxts.
(11.11.2002).
De Vocht, J. (1994). Experiments for the Characterization of Hypertext Structures.
YayınlanmamışYüksek Lisans Tezi. Netherlands: Eindhoven Univ. of
Technology.
Dwyer, J. (1996). Learning Differences and Teaching Styles.
(12.10.2001).
Ergür, O. E. (1998). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Dört Yıllık Lisans Programlarındaki
Öğrenci Ve Öğretim Üyelerinin Öğrenme Stillerinin Karşılaştırılması.
Yayımlanmamışdoktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Ford, N. & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and
learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and
Hypermedia, 9, (4), 281-311. AACE Digital Library veritabanından
08.01.2003 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23.
(25.04.2001).
Hein, T. L. Budny, D. D. (2000). Teaching tostudents’ learning styles: Approaches that
work. Frontiers in Education Conference. San Juan, Puerto Rico. (online),
14. 04. 2001
Hazari, S. I. (1998). Online Testing Methods for Web Courses. 14th Annual Conference
on Distance Teaching and Learning. http://sunil.umd.edu/ (11.09.2000).
Jonassen, D. H. (1986). Hypertext Principles for Text and Courseware Design.
Educational Psychologist, 21, (4). 269-292.
Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Effects of semantically structured hypertext knowledge bases
on users’ knowledge structures. Mcknight, C. (Editör). Hypertext. 153-168.
Chichester, England: Ellis Horword Limited.
Jones, W. J. (1998). Learning styles in computer based learning and web based
learning. (28.11.2001)
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and
Development.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı3 (2004) 129-146 146
Park, I. ve Hannafin, M. (1994). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of
interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development,
41. 63-85.
Riding, R. Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding
Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour.London: David Fulton
Publishers.
Sherry, L. (2000). The nature and purpose of online discourse: A brief synthesis of
current research related to the Web Project. International Journal of
Educational Telecommunications, 6(1). 19-52.
Yu, T. (2002). Empirical Study to Parallellism and the PI Theory. (05.04.2003).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com