You are here

Home » Content

Deneyim Eşitliğine Dayalı İnternet Temelli ve Yüz Yüze Öğrenme Sistemlerinin Öğrenci BaşarısıAçısından Karşılaştırılması

Comparisons of Internet-Basedand Face-to-Face Learning Systems Based on “Equivalency ofExperiences” According to Students’ Academic Achievements

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this research, two experimental groups that are equal according to learning experiences, each included 30 subjects, are created. Pre-Test Values of the students from different instruction systems comparedto the Corrected Post-Test Values and Permanence Average Values showed a significant difference in favor of face-to-face learning. In Internet-Based Learning System, the permanence of the knowledge learned by the students which is evaluated by a Permanence Test had showed a significant increase as to Post-Test achievement scores.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada her biri 30 denekten oluşan ve birbirine öğrenme deneyimleri açısından eşiki deney grubu oluşturulmuştur. Farklıöğrenme sistemlerinde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin öntest puanlarına göre düzeltilmişsontest ve kalıcılık ortalama puanları arasında yüz yüze öğrenme sistemi lehine anlamlıbir farkın olduğu görülmektedir. İnternet temelli öğrenme sisteminde öğrencilerin öğrendikleri bilgilerinin kalıcılığına ilişkin olarak uygulanan kalıcılık testi puanıortalamalarında sonteste göre anlamlı şekilde bir artışsöz konusudur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-deneyim-esitligine-dayali-internet-temelli-yuz-yuze-ogrenme-sistemlerinin-ogrenci-basarisiacisindan-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 3
113-132
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Baker, R.K. (2003). A Framework for design and evaluation of ınternet-based distance
learning courses Phase one - Framework justification, design and
evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, VI(II).

(02.05.2005)
Boghikian-Whitby, S. (2003). To take or not to take? The future of distence learning: A
quasi-experiment comparison of the effectiveness of internet based distance
learning versus face-to-face classroom. YayınlanmamışDoktora Tezi.
School of Education and Organizational Leadership, Organizational
Leadership Department, University of La Verne, Laverne, California. UMI
Number: 3081990.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001). Deneysel Desenler. PEGEM-A Yayıncılık. Ankara.
Christopher, M.M., Thomas, J.A. ve Tallent-Runnels, M.K. (2004). Raising the bar:
Encouraging high level thinking in Online Discussion Forums. Roeper
Review,26(3), 166–171. EBSCOHOST No: 12902668.
Demirli, C. (2002). Web TabanlıÖğretim Uygulamalarına İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri
(Fırat Üniversitesi Örneği).Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu’nda
sunulan bildiri.
(04.03.2005).
Grandzol, J.R., Eckerson, C.A. ve Grandzol, C.J. (2004). Beyond no significant
difference: Differentiating learning outcomes using multidimensional content
analysis.DEOSNEWS, 13(8). (24.03.2005).
Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. Londra ve New York:
Routledge.
Hovardaoğlu, S. (2000). DavranışBilimleri için Araştırma Teknikleri. VE-GA
Yayınları. Ankara.
Horton, W. (2000). Designing web based training. NY, Chichester, Weinheim,
Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 26, Sayı3(2006) 113-132 132
Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N. ve Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative
analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1),
29–49. (23.03.2005).
Jung, I., Leem, J. ve Choi, J. (2002). An evaluation study on the effects of web-based
instruction. (22.12.2002).
LaRose, R., Gregg, J. ve Eastin, M. (1998). Audiographic telecourses for the Web: An
experiment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication[On-line], 4(2).
(05.01.2003).
Misanchuk, M.G. (2003). Sense of community, satisfaction, and performance in a
distance education program.YayınlanmamışDoktora tezi. Indiana
University, Department of Instructional Systems Technology. UMI Number:
3122714.
Rivera, J.C., McAlister, M.K. ve Rice, M.L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes
and satisfaction between traditional and web based course offerings.
(25.11.2002).
Simonson, M. (1999). Equivalency theory and distance education. Tech Trends, 43(5),
5–8.
Simonson, M., Schlosser, C. ve Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A
new discussion. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1).
Şimşek, N. (2002a). Teknoloji Destekli Eşitlik Açıköğretimde DaralmayıGerektirir mi?
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1–2), 71–75.
Şimşek, N. (2002b). BİG16 Öğrenme Biçemleri Envanteri. Eğitim Bilimleri ve
Uygulama Dergisi, 1(1), 33–47.
Verduin, J.R. ve Clark, T.A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective
practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
Yıldırım, Z., Özden M. Y. ve Aksu, M., (2001). Comparison of Hypermedia Learning
and Traditional Instruction on Knowledge Acquisition and Retention,
Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 207–214. Ebscohost No: 6525095.
(Yonnie) Chyung, S-Y. ve Stepich, D. (2003). Applying the “congruence” principle of
Bloom’s Taxonomy to designing instruction. Quarterly Review Of Distance
Education, 4(3). Information Age Publishing. Ebscohost No: 11164095.
Yu, K.C. ve Lee, T.W. (2002). Critical issues and problems in web-based ınstruction in
higher education: A Delphi Study. Journal of Taiwan Normal University.
Mathematics & Science Education. (12.03.2005).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com