You are here

Home » Content

İşbirlikli Öğrenmenin İki FarklıTekniğinin Öğrencilerin Kimyasal Denge Konusundaki Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi

Effects of Two Different Cooperative Learning Technique on Students’ Academic Achievement of Chemical Equilibrium Topics

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of research is to determine the effects of Traditional Teaching Method with Jigsaw and Learning Together techniques which used in the implementation of cooperative learning method, on the academic achievements of the first year university students, participating in the teaching of chemical equilibrium unit. The sample of this study composed of 116 first year university students at different classes of the Department of Science Education. As the data collection instruments, Thinking of Logical Test (TOLT), Chemical Equilibrium Achievement Test (ceAT), Chemical Equilibrium Particulate Nature of Matter Evaluation Test (cePNMET), were used. Statistical analysis of the data obtained from research done. According to the results, obtained from the analyses, was determined more successful of the Jigsaw and Learning Together techniques than Traditional method.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı; işbirlikli öğrenme tekniklerinden jigsaw, birlikte öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretim yönteminin üniversite birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kimyasal denge konusundaki akademik başarıların etkisini tespit etmektir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemi, Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalıbirinci sınıflarının farklı şubelerinde okumakta olan toplam 116 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama aracıolarak Mantıksal Düşünme Testi, Kimyasal Dengede BaşarıTesti ve Kimyasal Denge Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi yapıldı. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre Jigsaw ve Birlikte Öğrenme tekniğinin Geleneksel yönteme göre daha başarılıolduğu tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-isbirlikli-ogrenmenin-iki-farklitekniginin-ogrencilerin-kimyasal-denge-konusundaki-akademik-basarilarina-etkisi.pdf
  • 3
763-791
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Abraham, M.R., Williamson, M.M. & Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A Cross-Age Study of
the Understanding Five Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165.
Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2003). Aktif Öğrenme. İzmir: Eğitim DünyasıYayınları. Kanyılmaz
Matbaası.
Anderson, W.L., Mitchell, S.M. & Osgood,M.P. (2005). Comparison of Student
Performance in Cooperative Learning and Traditional Lecture-Based Biochemistry
Classes. Biochemistry And Molecular Biology Education, 33(6), 387–393.
Ardac, D. & Akaygun, S. (2005). Using Static and Dynamic Visuals to Represent
Chemical Change at Molecular Level. International Journal of Science Education,
27(11), 1269-1298.
Ayas, A. & Demirbas, A.J. (1997). Turkish Secondary Students’ Conception of
Introductory Chemistry Concept. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 518-521.
Ayas, A. ve Özmen, H. (2002). Lise Kimya Öğrencilerinin Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı
KavramınıAnlama Seviyelerine İlişkin Bir Çalışma. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim
Dergisi, 19(2), 45-60.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein,J. (1987). Is an Atom Malleable? Journal of
Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66.
Bilgin, İ. ve Geban, Ö. (2002). Öğrencilerin Grup Çalışmalarındaki Performansları İle
Kimyasal Denge BaşarılarıArasındaki İlişki. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik
Eğitimi Kongresinde SunulmuşBildiri, ODTÜ, Ankara.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı3 (2009) 763 – 791 786
Birk, J.P. & Kurtz, M.J. (1999). Effect of Experience on Retention and Elimination of
Misconceptions about Molecular Structure and Bonding. Journal of Chemical
Education, 76(1), 124-128.
Boo, H.-K. & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in High School Students’ (Aged 16-18)
Conceptualizations about Chemical Reactions in Solution. Science Education, 85(5),
568-586.
Boz, Y. (2006). Turkish Pupils’ Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 203-214.
Chiu, M-H., Chou, C-C. & Liu, C-J. (2002). Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change:
Analysis of Constructing Mental Models ff Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research
In Science Teaching, 39(8), 688–712.
Colburn, A. (2004). Inquiry Scientists Want to Know. Educational Leadership. 62(1),
63-66.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J. & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving Science Inquiry with
Elementary Students of Diverse Backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 42(3), 337-357.
Doymus, K. (2007). The Effect of a Cooperative Learning Strategy in the Teaching of
Phase and One-Component Phase Diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(11),
1857-1860.
Doymuş, K. ve Şimşek, Ü. (2007). Kimyasal Bağların Öğretilmesinde Jigsaw
Tekniğinin Etkisi ve Bu Teknik Hakkında Öğrenci Görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi,
173(1), 231-243.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı3 (2009) 763 – 791 787
Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique.
Research in Science Education, 37(5), 249-260.
Doymus, K., Simsek, U. & Karacop, A. (2009). The Effects of Computer Animations
and Cooperative Learning Methods in Micro, Macro and Symbolic Level Learning of
States of Matter. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36,
109-128.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Fraser, D.M. (2001). First Year Chemical Engineering Students’
Conceptions of Energy in Solution Processes: Phenomenographic Categories for
Common Knowledge Construction. Science Education, 85(5), 509-535.
Eilks, I. (2005). Experiences and Reflections about Teaching Atomic Structure in a
Jigsaw Classroom in Lower Secondary School Chemistry Lessons. Journal Of
Chemical Education, 82(2), 313-319.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving Teaching and Learning Through Chemistry Education
Research: A Look to the Future. Journal of Chemistry Education,76, 548-553.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V. & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the Particulate Nature
of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
Ghaith, G. & El-Malak, M.A. (2004). Effect of Jigsaw II on Literal and Higher Order
EFL Reading Comprehension. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 105-115.
Gillies, R.M. (2006). Teachers' and Students' Verbal Behaviors during Cooperative and
Small-Group Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 271-287.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı3 (2009) 763 – 791 788
Graves, A. P. (1998). An Investigation Comparing Traditional Recitation Instruction to
Computer Tutorials Which Combine 3-D Animation with Varying Levels of Visual
Complexity, Including Digital Video in Teaching Various Chemistry Topics.
YayımlanmamışDoktora Tezi, The University of Oklahoma Graduate College,
Norman, Oklahoma.
Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the Chemical Equilibrium Concept:
Constrained, Word Associations and Conception. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 25(5), 319-333.
Haidar, A.H. & Abraham, M.R. (1991). A Comparison of Applied and Theoretical
Knowledge of Concepts Based On the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
Harrison, A. G. & Jong, O.D. (2005). Exploring the Use of Multiple Analogical Models
When Teaching and Learning Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research In Science
Teaching, 42(10), 1135–1159.
Hedeen, T. (2003). The Reverse Jigsaw: A Process of Cooperative Learning and
Discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325-332.
Hennessy, D. & Evans, R. (2006). Small-Group Learning in the Community College
Classroom. The Community College Enterprise, 12(1), 93-110.
Huddle, B.P. (1998). Conceptual Question on LeChatelier’s Principle. Journal of
Chemical Education, 75(9), 1175.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The New Circles of Learning:
Cooperation in the Classroom and School. U.S.A: ASCD Publications.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı3 (2009) 763 – 791 789
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom.
Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
Kokkotas, P. & Vlachos, I. (1998). Teachingthe Topic of the Particulate Nature of
Matter in Prospective Teachers’ Training Courses. International Journal of Science
Education, 20(3), 291-303.
Kozma, R. B. & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice
Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena. Journal of Research
In Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.
Lai, C.Y. & Wu, C.C. (2006). Using Handhelds in a Jigsaw Cooperative Learning
Environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 284-297.
Liu, X. (2006). Effects of Combined Hands-On Laboratory and Computer Modeling on
Student Learning of Gas Laws: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 15(1), 89-100.
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education: Evidence-Based
Inquiry. Sixth Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Nahum, T. L., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A. & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a
New Teaching Approach for the Chemical Bonding Concept Aligned with Current
Scientific and Pedagogical Knowledge. Science Education, 91(4), 579-603.
Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical
Education, 69, 191-196.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 29, Sayı3 (2009) 763 – 791 790
Nakiboğlu, C. ve Kalın, Ş. (2009). Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Kimyada Problem
Çözme Basamaklarının Kullanımı İle İlgili Düşünceleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi,
17(2), 715-725.
Novick, S. & Nusbaum, J. (1981). Pupils' Understanding of Particulate Nature of
Matter: A Cross-Age Study. Science Education, 65(2), 187-196.
Piquette, J. S. & Heikkinen, H. W. (2005). Strategies Reported Used By Instructors to
Address Student Alternate Conceptions in Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research
In Science Teaching, 42(10), 1112–1134.
Raviolo, A. (2001). Assessing Students' Conceptual Understanding of Solubility
Equilibrium Assessing Students' Conceptual Understanding of Solubility Equilibrium.
Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 629-633.
Saribas, D. & Köseoglu, F. (2006). The Effect of the Constructivist Method on Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers' Achievement and Conceptual Understanding about
Aqueous Solution. Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 58-62.
Sharan, Y. (1999). Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods. Westport, USA:
Praeger Publishers.
Sisovic, D. & Bojovic, S. (2001).The Elaboration of the Salt Hydrolysis Concept by
Cooperative Learning. Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 19-23.
Slish, D. F. (2005). Assessment of the Use of the Jigsaw Method and Active Learning in
Non- Majors. Introductory Biology. Bioscene, 31(4), 4-10.
Tan, K-C. D. & Treagust, D. (1999). Evaluating Students’ Understanding of Chemical
Bonding. School Science Review, 81(294), 75–83.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com