You are here

Home » Content

İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi “Işık” Ünitesinde Teknoloji Destekli Öğretimin Öğrencilerin Fen Başarısına, Kalıcılığa ve Fene Karşı Tutumlarına Etkisi

The Effect of Supported Science Education to the Science Achievement, the Permanence of Knowledge and the Attitudes toward Science of 7th Grade Students

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to investigate of the effect of the technology supported science education in the unit “light” on the academic achievement, the permanence of knowledge and attitudes science of the 7th grade students. It is a research which is pre and post-test with control group design and it was performed in the fall term of 2010-2011 academic year. The participants for this study consisted of 37 (Experimental, n=20 and Control, n=17). The data of the research was collected by the Science Academic Achievement Test (SAAT) and the Attitude toward Science Test (ATST). “Technology Supported Learning Method” (Computer, Internet, video, DVD, slide shows, posters, three-dimensional images, graphics...) was applied to the experimental group and “Traditional Teaching Method” was used for control group. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between experimental and control group.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersi “ışık” ünitesinde; fen akademik başarılarına, kalıcılığa ve fene karşı tutumları üzerine teknoloji destekl i öğretimin (TDÖ) etkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Araştırma, 2010 – 2011 eğitim-öğretim yılı bahar döneminde 37 öğrenci ile (Deney, n = 20 ve Kontrol, n = 17) gerçekleştirilmiştir Çalışma, öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu deneysel bir çalışma olup, araştırmanın verileri Fen Akademik Başarı Testi (FABT) ile Fene Karşı Tutum Testi (FKTT) ile toplanmıştır.. Uygulamada ders, kontrol gr ubunda MEB Fen ve Teknoloji dersi öğretim programına göre sınıf içinde önerilen ve ders öğretmeninin kullandığı öğretim ile deney grubunda ise Teknoloji Destekli Öğretim (Bilgisayar, internet, video, VCD, slayt gösterileri, poster, üç boyutlu resimler, grafikler…) ile ders işlenmiştir. Deney ve kontrol grubunda yer alan öğrencilerin başarı, kalıcılık ve tutum testi puanları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık vardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-7.sinif-ogrencilerinin-fen-teknoloji-dersi-isik-unitesinde-teknoloji-destekli-ogretimin-ogrencilerin-fen-basarisina-kaliciliga-fene-karsi-tutumlarina-etkisi.pdf
  • 3
733-760
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alkan, C., Deryakulu, D. &Şimşek, N. (1995).Eğitim Teknolojisine Giriş. Ankara:
Önder Matbaacılık.
Aşkar, P. &Orçan, H. (1987).The Development of an Attitude Scale toward Computers.
METU Journal of Human Sciences, 1(2), 19-23.
Ateş, A., Altunay, U. &Altun, E. (2006). The Effects of Computer Assisted English
Instruction on High School Preparatory Students’ Attitudes Towards Computers
and English. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2(2), 97-112.
Bal, H., Keleş, M. ve Erbil, O.(2002). Eğitim Teknolojisi Kılavuzu, Ankara: Milli
Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Benli, E., Dökme, İ. veSarıkaya, M. (2011).The effects of technology teaching materials
on students’ image of scientists. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal
(Elsevier), 15 (2011) 2371–2376.
Benli, E. veDökme, İ. (2011).The effect of the technology supported science education
on achievement and attitudes of students. International Journal of Education
Administration and Policy Studies, 3(12), 219-221.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007).Sosyal bilimler için very analizi el kitabı.(8. basım). Ankara:
Pegem A Yayınevi.
Collier, K. G., Paula, F.J. & Goff, R.J. (1971).Colleges of Education Learning
Programmes: A proposal (Working Paper No.5). Washington, DC: Commission
on Instructional Technology.
Çağıltay, K., Çakıroğlu, J., Çağıltay, N. ve Çakıroğlu, E. (2001). Öğretimde Bilgisayar
Kullanımına İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, 21: 19-28.
Demirel, Ö. (1993). Eğitim Terimleri Sözlüğü. Ankara: Usem yayınları.
Downs, E., Clark, & Bennett, J. (1995).New directions for teacher education in the
information age. In D.A. Willis, B. Robin &J.Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the
Sixth International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and
Teacher Education, 6, 247-249.
Fisher, M. (2000). Computer skills of initial teacher education students. Journal of
Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(1), 109–123.
Benli, Kayabaşı & Sarıkaya GEFAD / GUJGEF 32(3): 733-760 (2012) 757
Geban, Ö. (1995). The Effect of Microcomputer Use In Chemistry Course. Hacettepe
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültes iDergisi, 11, 25-28.
Gentry, C.G. (1991). Educational technology: A question of meaning. In G. Anglin
(Ed.), Instructional Technology, l-10. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Goetsch, D.L. (1984). Impact of Technology on Curriculumand Delivery Strategies in
Vocational Education. Adults and the Changing Workplace. Shulman, Carol
Herrnstadt (Ed.). Adults and the Changing Workplace. American Vocational
Association, Inc., 191-200.
Jonassen, D., ve Reeves, T. (1996). Leaming with Technology: Using Computers as
Cognitiye Tools. In D. l-I.Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Educational
Communications and Technology, 693-719.
Komis, V., Ergazakia, M, &Zogzaa, V. (2007).Comparing computer-supported dynamic
modeling and “paper & pencil” concept mapping technique in students’
collaborative activity. Computers&Education, 49(4), 991-1017.
McCannon, M., & Crews, T. B. (2000).Assessing the technology needs of elementary
school teachers.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 111-121.
Means, B. (1994). Using Technology to Advance Educational Goals. In B. Means (Ed.).
Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise: 1-22. San
Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Middlehurst, R. (1999). New realities for leadership and governance in higher
education? Tertiary Education and Management. 5, 307-329.
Nakhlek, M. B. &Kjarcik, J. S. (1993). A Protocol Analysis of The influence of
Technology on Students’ Actions, Verbal Commentary, and Thought Processes
During the Performance of Acid-Base Titrations. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 30, 1149–1168.
Padrón, Y.N., & Waxman, H.C. (1996). Improving the teaching and learning of English
language learners through instructional technology. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 23(4), 341-354.
Rugayah, H., Hashim, H. & Wan, N. M. (2004).Attitudes toward learning about and
working with computers of students at unit. The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology (TOJET), 3(2).24-35.
Simon, Y. R. (1983). Pursuit Of Happiness And Lust For Power in Technological
Society. Philosophy and Technology. Free Pres, New York.
Strudler, N. B. & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons From Exemplary Colleges of Education:
Factors Affecting Technology Integration in Preservice Programs. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63-81.
Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Yargı Kitap ve Yayın Evi, 9.baskı,
Ankara.
İlköğretim 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen ve… 758
Tekindal, S. (2009). Okullarda Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri, Nobel Yayınları,
2.baskı, Ankara.
Uluğ, F. (2000).İlköğretimde Teknoloji Eğitimi, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı 146. Ankara:
MilliEğitimBasımevi.
Williams, H. S. &Kingham, M. (2003). Infusion of technology into the curriculum.
Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(3), 178-184.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com