You are here

Home » Content

The value trade-off in Higher Education service: A qualitative intercultural approach to students’ perceptions

Journal Name:

  • Intangible Capital

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.706

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have become a highly competitive market, where consumers (i.e. students) are highly involved in their choices, and managers need to focus on competitive edges. This paper aims to understand the factors that influence international Master students’ choice behaviour and fulfil student expectations of customer value in HEIs. Design/methodology: With qualitative information (five focus groups) collected from international students (of 12 different nationalities) of several universities in Spain, UK and China, the paper investigates the formation of customer value as a trade-off between benefits and costs. This qualitative approach aims first at assessing this particular service through the concept of value through verifying both the positive and negative dimensions of educational service, and second, to comment on the intercultural aspects of this dual approach to higher education consumption. Findings: The results show different levels of benefits: the functional value generally comes from infrastructures and good teachers that offer abundant practical experiences. The benefits from quality education also derived from teamwork with the colleagues who possess equal academic strength. Social benefits come from experiences outside the academic environment, working with people from different cultural backgrounds who have different perspectives. Emotional rewards come from University reputation and relationships with instructors. Costs of time and effort are differently seen across programs and vary widely upon nationalities and cultural backgrounds. Practical implications: Since the competitive environments of HEIS are fast becoming more and more complex changing rapidly and dynamically, attention must be paid to International students spreading positive or negative word-of-mouth out of their experience. Different values of customers in different countries suggest that the strategy used by the corporation in a certain country, may not be apply to another. Social implications: The results of the study allow the industry to see the future prospects of the meat sector and make the necessary changes. The results lead to improved transparency and responsible behaviour. Originality/value: Within the wide trend of research on students’ choice, this work has focused on International Master Students, a public with relatively limited number of studies. The contribution lays on a value-based approach as a trade-off focusing, as a step forward from the traditional sociodemographic approaches, on behavioural variables (functional, social and emotional values) and considering not just price but also non-monetary costs.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-value-trade-higher-education-service-qualitative-intercultural-approach-students-perceptions.pdf
  • 4
855
880
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Angulo, F., Pergelova, A., & Rialp. J. (2010). A market segmentation approach for higher education
based on rational and emotional factors. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(1), 1-17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841241003788029
Arambewela, R., Hall, J, & Zuhair, S. (2005). Postgraduate International Students from Asia: Factors
Influencing Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 15(2), 105-127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J050v15n02_05
Aydin, S. (2012). I Am Not the Same after My ERASMUS: A Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report,
17(55), 1-23.
Bamber, M. (2014). What motivates Chinese women to study in the UK and how do they perceive their
experience?. Higher Education, 68, 47-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9679-8 Bitew, G. (2016). A qualitative study of the academic and social factors affecting latino students at a
liberal arts college: Accomplishments and challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 75,
57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.007
Boksberger, P.E., & Melsen. L. (2011). Perceived value: A critical examination of definitions, concepts
nad measures for the service industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(3), 229-240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876041111129209
Bolton, R.N., Kannan, P.K., & Bramlett, M.D. (2000). Implications of loyalty program membership
and service experiences for customer retention and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
28(1), 95-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281009
Bonnema, J., & van der Weldt, D.L.R. (2008). Information and source preferences of a student market
in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(4), 314-327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875653
Breen, R.L. (2006). A practical guide to focus group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,
30(3), 463-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098260600927575
Catterall, M., & Maclaran, P. (2006). Focus groups in marketing research. In Handbook of Qualitative
Research Methods in Marketing, (Chapter 19, pp. 255-267). http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781847204127.00027
Chrzanowska, J. (2002). Interviewing groups and individuals in qualitative market research (Vol. 2). Sage.
Day, G.S. (1999). Market driven strategy. Processes for creating value (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Deshields Jr., O.W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and
retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg's two-factor theory. International Journal of
Educational Management, 19(2), 128-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540510582426
Dodds, W.B., & Monroe, K.B. (1985). The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective
Product Evaluations. In E.C. Hirschman & M.B. Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (pp.
85-90). Association for Consumer Research.
Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality
Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880710723025
Finch, H., & Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and
researchers (170-198).
Fombona, J., Rodríguez, C., & Sevillano, M.Á.P. (2013). The Motivational Factor of Erasmus Students
at the University. International Education Studies, 6(4), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p1 Gallarza, M.G., Gil-Saura, I., & Holbrook, M.B. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the
meaning and role of customer value. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 179-191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cb.328
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and cocreation.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-
0308-3
Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory: Strangers or
siblings?. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470593112467267
Halcomb, E.J., Gholizadeh, L., Digiacomo, M., Phillips, & Davidson, P.M. (2007). Literature review:
Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 1000-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x
Hemsley-Brown, J.A., & Oplatka, I.B. (2015). University choice: What do we know, what don’t we
know and what do we still need to find out?. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3),
254-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijem-10-2013-0150
Holbrook, M.B. (1999). Consumer value. A framework for analysis and research. London: Routledge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203010679
Holbrook, M.B., & Hirschman, E.C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer
fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208906
Jensen, H.R. (1996). The interrelationship between customer and consumer value. Asia Pacific Advances
in Consumer Research, 2, 60-63.
Jensen, R.E., Christy, K., Gettings, P.E., & Lareau, L. (2013). Document Interview and Focus Group
Research: A Content Analysis of Scholarship Published in Ranked Journals. Communication Methods
and Measures, 7(2), 126-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.789838
Jowett, M., & O'Toole, G. (2006). Focusing researchers' minds: Contrasting experiences of using focus
groups in feminist. Qualitative Research, 6(4), 453-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794106068014
Kress, V.E., & Shoffner, M.F. (2007). Focus groups: A practical and applied research approach for
counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 85(2), 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-
6678.2007.tb00462.x
Lai, A.W. (1995). Consumer values, products benefits, and customer value: A consumption behavior
approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 381-388.Ledden L., Kalafatis, S.P., & Samouel, P. (2007). The Relationship between Personal Values and
Perceived Value of Education. Journal of Business Research, 60, 965-974.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.021
Lee, H.-J., Lee, J., Makara, K.A., Fishman, B.J., & Hong, Y-I. (2015). Does higher education foster
critical and creative learners? An exploration of two universities in South Korea and the USA. Higher
Education Research & Development, 34(1), 131-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.892477
Lehmann, D., Mcalister, L., & Staelin, R. (2011). Sophistication in Research in Marketing. Journal of
Marketing, 75(4), 155-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.155
Leroi-Werelds, S., Streukens, S., Brady, M.K., & Swinnen, G. (2014). Assessing the value of commonly
used methods for measuring customer value: A multi-setting empirical study. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 42(4), 430-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0363-4
Levy, D. (2006). Qualitative methodology and grounded theory in property research. Pacific Rim Property
Research Journal, 12(4), 369-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2006.11104216
Lovelock, C.H. (1983). Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing,
47(3), 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251193
Lovelock, C.H. (1996). Services Marketing (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Malhotra, N.K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (Vol. 834). New Jersey: Pearson
Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2010)6
Marín-García, J.A., Martínez-Gómez, M., & Giraldo-O’meara, M. (2014). Rediseñando el trabajo en las
aulas universitarias: Factores relacionados con la satisfacción en estudiantes de ingeniería y
administración de empresas. Intangible Capital, 10(5), 1026-1051.
Mark, E. (2013) Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher
Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
Moogan, Y.J. (2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: A conjoint
approach. In Marketing Intelligence & Planning (179-187). MCB University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634500110391726
Nilson, T.H. (1992). Value-added marketing: marketing management for superior results. Berkshire, UK:
McGraw Hill.
Oliver, R.L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?. Journal of Marketingi, 63, 33-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252099 Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A
research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 168-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281015
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Reay, D., Davies, J., David, M., & Ball, S.J. (2001). Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, `race`
and the higher education choice process. Sociology, 35(4), 855-874.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and selecting samples. Qualitative research practice: A
guide for social science students and researchers, 2, 111-145.
Sulkowski, N.B., & Deakin, M.K. (2009). Does Understanding Culture Help Enhance Students’
Learning Experience?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(2), 154-166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09596110910935651
Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., & Johnson, L.W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value
relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
Tuckman, B.W., & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group &
Organization Management, 2(4), 419-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404
Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2012).The nature and understanding of value: A service-dominant logic
perspective. In S.L. Vargo & R.F. Lusch (Ed.). Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in
Markets and Marketing (Review of Marketing Research) (9: 1-12 ). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/s1548-6435(2012)0000009005
Verghese, A., & Kamalanabhan, T.J. (2015). Attributes influencing information search for College
choice: An exploratory study. Int. J. Business Innovation and Research, 9(1), 34-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2015.065952
Watt, C., Angelis, J., & Chapman, D. (2012). Customer value and lean operations in masters education.
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education
for Future Wellbeing, EPDE 2012, pp. 699-704.
Winlow, H., Simm, D., Marvell, A., & Schaaf, R. (2013). Using Focus Group Research to Support
Teaching and Learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(2), 292-303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.696595 Woodruff, R.B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2),139-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350
Woodruff, R.B., & Gardial, S. (1996). Know your customer: New approaches to customer value and satisfaction.
Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Business,
Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-end Model and
Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Zeithaml, V.A., & Bitner, M.J. (1996). Services Marketing. McGraw-Hill.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com