You are here

Home » Content

ASSESSING THE RECEPTIVITY OF OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMMES AMONG ORDINARY AND ADVANCED LEVEL STUDENTS: A CASE OF THE ZIMBABWE OPEN UNIVERSITY

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The present study was undertaken to establish Ordinary and Advanced level students` receptivity of Open and Distance Learning Programmes offered by Zimbabwe Open University. With the proliferation of several higher education institutions, which include among them the eleven universities in the country and at one polytechnic in each of the ten provinces of Zimbabwe, competition for students has become stiff as enrolments in some of these institutions continue to plummet. There was, therefore, need to establish how receptive these young adults were of the ODL mode, in light of the introduction of the Enhanced Tutorial Programme (ETP) as an innovation in the ODL system at the Zimbabwe Open University. A total of 100 student respondents made up the sample which consisted of 64 (64%) male and 36 (36%) female students whose age range was between 16 and 22 years. These were drawn from rural and urban schools located in Chegutu district. Results show that a slight majority of 56 students preferred to study with the ZOU because of their area of residence which was prohibitive for them to enrol at a conventional college. The respondents overwhelmingly rejected the notion that there was poor quality of education at the ZOU. Because ODL had a lot of flexibility and was convenient, the majority of the respondents preferred to study through the ODL mode. Some preferred the ODL mode because while some conventional institutions required above 10 points at Advanced level, ZOU only required 5 Ordinary level subjects, including English language, passed with a grade C or better. However, the most prohibitive factor as indicated by the majority of the students was lack of access and competence in the use of the internet and other forms of technology since their understanding of the ODL mode entailed the use of modern technology, which is not currently the situation at ZOU. Also inhibitive for most respondents, was the argument that there was little time for face-to-face interaction. These young adults needed to make and meet new friends and socialize with colleagues from various socio-cultural backgrounds, an adventure not always possible in ODL systems due to geographical distances apart.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-assessing-receptivity-open-and-distance-learning-programmes-among-ordinary-and-advanced-level-students-case-zimbabwe-open-university.pdf
  • 3
73-87
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Agyeman, B. & Dadzie, P. (2010). Providing Information Communication Technology Support to Distance
Education Students: A case of the University of Ghana, Legon: TOJDE, Volume 11, Number 3, Article 6.
Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students` Attitudes and Perceptions towards the effectiveness of Mobile Learning in
King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, TOJET, volume 8 Issue 2 Article 10.
Allsop, T. (2008). “Can Open and Distance Learning help make South Asia competitive?” in Education Research
Journal, DFID, UK.
Ampadu, E. (2010). An investigation into Students’ Attitude towards Adult Education Programmes: the case of
Ghana International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications October, November, December
2010 Volume:1 Issue:3
CEDL (1999). Students` attitudes towards distance learning. Distance Learning Abstracts [serial online].
Available at: http://www.lucent.com/cedl/stdtatt.html
Chakwera, E. and Saiti, F. (2005). Training Teachers through the Distance Mode: The Experience of Domasi
College of Education in Malawi. Domasi College of Education. Malawi
Garland, M. R. (1993). Student perceptions of the situational, institutional, dispositional, and epistemological
barriers to persistence. Distance Education.
Gibson, C. C., & Graff, A.O. (1992). Impact of adults' preferred learning styles and perception of barriers on
completions of external baccalaureate degree programs. Journal of Distance Education.
Guernsey, L. (1998). Distance education for the not-so-distant. Chronicle of Higher Education [serial online].
Hellman, J. A. (2003). The Riddle of Distance Education: Promise, problems and applications for development.
Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: some preliminary
results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Hunte, S. (2010). Profile of the UWI Distance learners: The implications for Online Curriculum Development,
Teaching and Learning at the University. TOJDE, Volume 11, number 3, Article 4.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of Distance Education (3rd Ed). London: Routledge.
Koch J. V. (1998). How women actually perform in distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education
Mastrian K. G. & McGonigle D. (1997). Older student perceptions of technology based learning. On-Line Journal
of Nursing Informatics. http://cac.psu.edu/~dxm12/percep2.html
Ojo, D, A. & Olakulehjin, F. K. (2006). “Attitudes and Perceptions of Students to Open and Distance Learning in
Nigeria”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 7, Number 1. National Open
University of Nigeria.
Olcott Jr., D. J. & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in
post-secondary distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education.
Parker, A. (1999). A study of variables that predict dropout from distance education. International Journal of
Educational Technology. http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n2/parker/index.html. Retrieved October 15, 2010.
Peat, J. & Helland, K.(2002). Perceptions of Distance Learning and the Effects on Selection Decisions. Retrieved
from: http://bus.utk.edu/iopsyc/pdf/Perceptions-of-Distance-Education-siop2003...
Richards, C. N. & Ridley D. R. (1997). Factors affecting college students’ persistence in on-line computermanaged instruction. College Student Journal [serial online]. December 1997
Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance
education. British Educational Research Journal.
Rekkedal, T. & Dye, A. (2007). Mobile distance learning with PDAs: Development and testing of pedagogical
and system solutions supporting mobile distance learners. International review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
Ryan, R. C. (2000). Student assessment comparison of lecture and online construction equipment and methods
classes. T.H.E. Journal, 27(6). Retrieved from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2596.cfm.
UNESCO (2001). Teacher Education through Distance Learning Technology-Curriculum-Cost-Evaluation
Summary of Case Studies, Paris, UNESCO.
Valenta, A., Therriault, D., Dieter, M. & Mrtek, R. (2001). Identifying Student Attitudes and Learning Styles in
Distance Education JALN volume 5, issue 2 - September 2001.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com