Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2005). Aktif Öğrenme. Eğitim Dünyası Yayımları. İzmir.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: Theory into Practice, 41(4).
Arter, J. (1997). Using assessment as a tool for learning, in: R. BLUM & J. ARTER (Eds) Student Performance
Assessment in an Era of Restructuring, 1-6 (Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development).
Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum, & F.
Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (3-29).
Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Boud, D. (1995) Enhancing Learning Through Self Assessment. Kogan Page, London.
Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning Assessment with long-term learning, Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education. 31(4), 399-413.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2003). Validity and reliability of peer assessments with a missing data estimation
technique. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 3(1), 1511-
1514.
Dimitrov D. M., and Rumrill, Jr.P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work: A
Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 20(2):159-165
Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, 8(2),96-100.
Dochy, F. & Moerkerke, G. (1997). The present, the past and the future of achievement testing and
performance assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(5), 415-432.
Dochy, F., Segers M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: a
review. Studies in Higher Education. 24(3).
Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.). Constructivism in education. New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and
Training International, 32, 175–187.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.
American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.
American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher
Education, 20, 289–300.
Hargreaves, 2007, The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles,
Policy & Practice, 14(2): 185-199
Honebein, J. (1996). Seven Goals for the Design of Constructivist Learning.
http://cter.ed.uiuc.edu/JimL_Courses/edpsy490i/su01/readings/honebein.htm,(Erişim: 15.6.2008).
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina,
MN: Interaction Book Company.
Jonassen, D. H. 1994. Towards a Constructivist Design Model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist. 50 (9), 741-749.
Ploegh K., Tillema H. H., and Segers M.S.R., (2009). In search of quality criteria in peer assessment practices.
Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2-3): 102-109
Ross J. A., (2006). The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self-Assessment. Practical Assessment Research &
Evaluation, 11(10): 1-13
Sambell, K., McDowell, L. & Brown, S. (1997). ‘But is it fair?’: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the
consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349-371.
Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and
Learning, 4, 33–45.
Shrauger, S. J. & Osberg, T. M. (1981). The relative accuracy of selfprediction and judgements by others in
psychological assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 322-351.
Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer and
collaborative assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 221-233.
Topping K. J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6),631–645
Van den Berg I., Admiraal W. & Pilot A. (2006) Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher
education. Studies in Higher Education, 31( 3), 341–356
Webb, N. M. (1997). Assessing students in small collaborative groups. Theory into Practice, 36 (4), 205-213.
Wilson, B. G., & Cole, P. (1991). A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research &
Development Journal. http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~bwilson/hndbkch.html (Erişim: 20 Mayıs 2009).
Yıldız, Akpınar, Tatar and Ergin (2009). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Metacognition Scale
for Primary School Students, Educational Sciences: Th eory & Practice, 9(3), 1591-1604
Yurdabakan, İ. (2011a). The investigation of peer assessment in primary school cooperative learning groups
with respect to gender. Education 3-13. 39(2), 153-169
Yurdabakan, İ. (2011b). The View of Constructivist Theory on Assessment: Alternative Assessment Methods in
Education, Ankara Universty, Journal of Faculty of Education Sciences, 44(1), 51-77.
Yurdabakan ve Cihanoğlu (2009). Öz ve akran değerlendirmenin uygulandığı işbirlikli okuma ve
kompozisyon tekniğinin başarı, tutum ve strateji kullanım düzeylerine etkisi, DEÜ, SBE Dergisi, 11(4),105-
123
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
