You are here

Examination of Pre-School Teachers’ Beliefs About Science Education

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to find out preschool teachers’ beliefs about preschool children’s ability to learn science concepts and subjects and in connection with their beliefs examine their perception of self-efficacy in science teaching. Sampling of the study is composed of 100 teachers who are working in preschool institutions. Beliefs about Reformed Science Teaching and Learning (BARSTL) which is developed by Sampson and Benton and adapted into Turkish by Büyüktaskapu is used as data collection device. This scale is prepared to identify teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and education. It consists of 32 questions that reflect both current science education philosophy in early childhood period and traditional science education philosophy. In addition to that The Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Inventory (STEBI) developed by Riggs and Enochs in 1990 and adapted into Turkish by Bıkmaz in 2002 is used as data collection device too. Gathered data was analyzed with frequency, percentage, arithmetic mean, standard deviation and Pearson correlation coefficient importance test. According to study results it is seen that preschool teachers’ beliefs about their self efficacy in science education is average and they still adopt traditional methods instead of constructivist methods in science teaching. Teachers with high self efficacy in science teaching prefer to use traditional methods in science teaching. This result indicates that in preschool science teaching children are transferred shallow information in many subjects. On the other hand the aim of science education should be in fewer subjects children could learn in detail so children can develop their science skills and construct their own information themselves.
15
25

REFERENCES

References: 

Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S. ; Koray, Ö. (2005), Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inanç düzeyleri ve
problem çözme becerileri üzerine bir arastırma- Kastamonu ili örneği, Kastamonu Eğitim
Dergisi, 13(1), 93-102.
Aydın, G.; Balım, A., (2005) Yapılandırmacı Yaklasıma Göre Modellendirilmis Disiplinler Arası
Uygulama: Enerji Konularının Öğretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri fakültesi Dergisi,
Cilt.38, Sayı.2, 145 -166.
Balcı, A. S. (2007). Fen Öğretiminde Yapılandırmacı Yaklasım Uygulamasının Etkisi. Selçuk Üniv.
Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yayımlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse.
Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12.
Bıkmaz, F.(2004) Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Fen Öğretiminde Öz Yeterlilik Đnancı" Ölçeğinin Geçerlik Ve
Güvenirlik Çalısması. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. Sayı 161.
Bodner. G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63
(10), 873-878.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search for understanding the case for constructivist
classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
Chall, J.S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New
York: Guilford Press.
DeBoer, G. E. (2002a). Student-centered teaching in a standards-based world: Finding a sensible
balance. Science and Education, 11(4), 405-417.
Fosnot. E. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York and London:
Teachers College Press.
French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated, early childhood curriculum. Early
Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138-149.
Gelman, R., and Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early
ChildhoodResearch Quarterly, 19(1), 150-158.
Harlan, J. (1976) Science Experiences for the Early Childhood Years (Columbus, Ohio, Charles E.
Merrill Publishing Co).
Henson R. K.(2001). Teacher self-efficacy: substantive ımplications and measurement dilemmas.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the educational research exchange Hildebrand, V.
(1981) Introduction to Early Childhood Education (New York, Macmillan Publishing Co).
© Educational Research Association, All rights reserved. 24
Büyüktaskapu, S. / IJERs 2011, 4(2):16-25
Hildebrand, V. (1981) Introduction to Early Childhood Education (New York, Macmillan Publishing
Co).
Howe,A. (1993). Science in early childhood education. In B. Spodek (Ed), Handbook of research on
the education of young children (pp.225-235). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company
Kamii, C., & DeVries, R. (1978/1993). Physical knowledge in preschool education: Implications of
Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lavonen, J.; Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of Teaching and Learning School Science in Finland:
Reflections on PISA 2006 Results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 922-944.
Limon, M. (2001). On the Cognitive Conflict as an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Changes: a
Critical Appraisal.Learning and Instruction, 36(4-5), 357-380.
Marlowe, A. B., & Page, L. M. (1998) Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom.
California: Corwin Press.
Merton, R. K., & Storer, N. W. (1979). The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Orhan, A. T. (2004). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarına Fotosentez Konusunun Öğretiminde Yapısalcı
Yaklasımın Etkileri Đle Geleneksel Öğretim Yönteminin Karsılastırılması. Yayımlanmamıs
Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Özden, M.; Akdağ G.; Ekmekçi, S. (2009). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Fen Öğretimine Đliskin
Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri Đle Öz Yeterlilik Đnanç Düzeyleri Arasındaki Đliskinin Arastırılması,
XVIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, Đzmir.
Paulu, N. & Martin, M. (1992) Helping Your Child Learn Science (Washington, US Department of
Education).
Plourde, L.A.(2001). The genesis of science teaching ın the elementary school: the ınfluence of
student teaching http://www.ed.psu.edu/CI/Journals/2001aets/su1_08_plourde.rtf. 07.08.2006
Riggs, I. M., and Enochs L. G. (1990). Toward The Development of an Elementary Teacher’s Science
Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument. Science Education, 74 (69), 625-637.
Roberts, D.A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In: S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.),
Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780.). New York: Routledge.
Sampson, V., Benton, A. (2006). Development and validation of the Beliefs about Science Teaching
and Learning (BARSTL) Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Association for Science Teacher Education, Portland, OR.
Examination of Pre-School Teachers’ Beliefs About Science Education
The International Journal of Educational Research (IJERs) 25
Sarıkaya, H. (2004), Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilgi düzeyleri fen öğretimine yönelik tutum ve özyeterlik
inançları,Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu Üniversitesi. Orta Öğretim Fen ve Matematik
Alanları Eğitimi Bölümü, Ankara.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., Driver, R., Emberton, J. (1994) Working from Children’s Ideas: Planning and
Teaching a Chemistry Topic from a Constructivist Perspective içinde Fensham, P., Gunstone, P.,
White, R. The Content of Science. The Falmer Press.
Sherman. J. S. (2000). Science and Science Teaching. U.S.A.: The College of New Jersey.
Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1994). STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform. Ways
of Knowing Science Series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Ave.,
New York.
Staver, J. R. (1998). Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science
teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 501-520.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a Referent for Teaching and Learning. In K. Tobin
(ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education (pp.3-38).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates
Tsai, C. (2007). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and
students’ views. Science Education, 91, 222–243.
Yanpar, T. , Hazer, B. , Arslan, A. (2006). 10. Sınıf Çözünürlük Konusunda Olusturmacı öğrenme
Yaklasımına dayalı Grup Çalısmalarının Kullanılması. Đnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, Cilt. 7, Sayı: 11, S: 113-122.
Wallace, J., Louden, W. (2002). Dilemmas of Science. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer 2 Park
Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com