You are here

Home » Content

A conversation analysis of the function of silence in writing conferences

Journal Name:

  • Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the recent issues in English as a Second/Foreign Language (ESL/EFL) writing instruction has been the quest for a more effective way to give feedback to L2 learners’ writing drafts. Although teacher-learner writing conferences have been increasingly used for providing ample opportunity for negotiating revisions, relatively little attention has been given to actual teacher-learner conversation. Drawing on sociocultural theory, which holds that all cognitive developments are results of ‘social interactions’, and drawing on conversation analysis as an analytical tool, this study attempts to explore the different functions of ‘silence’ in writing conferences during teacher-learner conversation. The data comes from transcripts of six 1-hour writing conferences video-recorded in a graduate program with 7 candidates in Iran. During the writing conferences, learners’ drafts were discussed. Findings of the study demonstrated that teacher’s silence can play a key role in the management of turns in writing conferences, thereby providing the parties with various opportunities for accomplishing intersubjectivity: the teacher used silence to rethink the information provided during writing conferences, and the learner exploited silence to revise the writing draft. The current study, reporting a range of functions of silence in writing conferences, offers an extension to the existing literature and draws language teachers’, specifically writing instructors’, attention to different functions of silence in writing conferences.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-conversation-analysis-function-silence-writing-conferences.pdf
  • 2
69
86
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahmadi Shirazi, M., & Shekarabi, Z. (2014). The role of written corrective feedback in enhancing the linguistic accuracy of Iranian Japanese learners’ writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 99-118.
Akbarzadeh, R., Saeidi, M., & Chereh, M. (2014). The effect of oral interactive feedback on the accuracy and complexity of EFL learners’ writing performance: Uptake and retention. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 105-126.
Berg, B. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 4(2), (July, 2016) 69-86 83
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-363.
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
Carnicelli, T.A. (1980). The writing conference: A one-to-one conversation. In T. Donovan & B. McClelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 101-131). Urbana (IL.), National Council of Teachers of English.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
Chang, C. F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29, 63-78.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
Ewert, D. E. (2009). L2 writing conferences: Investigating teacher talk. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 251-269.
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Research implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R. (2012). Technology and corrective feedback for L2 writers: Principles, practices, and problems. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 7-29). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443-460.
Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
Haneda, M. (2004). The joint construction of meaning in writing conferences. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 178-219.
Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555-568.
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33-54.
84 M. Mirzaee & B. Yaqubi/A conversation analysis of …
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in ESL writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2014). Turn taking and 'wait time' in classroom interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 1-12.
Jacobs, S. E., & Karliner, A.B. (1977). Helping writers to think: the effect of speech roles in individual conferences on the quality of thought in student writing. College English, 38(5), 489-505.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309.
Koshik, I. (2008). Questions and Questioning. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Koshik, I. (2009). Questions That Convey Information in Teacher-Student Conferences. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Why do you ask?: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 159-186). Oxford University Press.
Kurzon, D. (2007). Towards a typology of silence. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), 1673-1688.
Mushin, I., & Gardner, R. (2008). Silence is talk: Conversational silence in Australian Aboriginal talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 2033-2052.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis. London: Sage.
Qureshi, Z. (2012). Teacher-student talk in the one to one writing conference: Who talks more and why?. UCLan Journal of Pedagogic Research, 3, 27-36.
Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up! Journal of Teacher Education., 37(1), 43-50.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Swain, M. (2010). Talking-it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use/ learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: Introducing qualitative methods series. London: Sage.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 4(2), (July, 2016) 69-86 85
Van Beuningan, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in Dutch multilingual classroom. Language Learning, 62, 1-41.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York: Routledge.
Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting Speaking & Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2009). ‘Very good’ as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195-203.
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.
Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 519-535.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com