You are here

FRONTAL BÖLGE DEFEKTLERİNDE REKONSTRUKSİYON

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The reconstruction in the defects of the frontal region. Bony tissue defects in the fronîal region generally result following a severe trauma. The injury usually involves the surrounding struc-tures and other systems of the body. In these patients the priority is the stabiiization of the general condition followed by neurosurgİcal and ophthalmologic consultations. Autogenous bone grafts or alloplastic materials can be used for the reconstruction of the bony defects in the frontal region in the late period. In this study; 14 patients whosc frontal region bony defects reconstructed by utilizing calvarial bone is demonstrated and the results are discussed.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Fronîal bölge kemik doku defektleri genellikle şiddetli travma sonucu meydana gelir. Sıklıkla komşu yapıları ve diğer sistemleri de etkileyen bir yaralanma vardır. Bu hastalarda akut dönemde genel durum stabilİzasyonu sağlanır, nöroşirurji ve oftalmoloji konsültasyonları tamamlanır. Geç dönemde frontal bölgede meydana gelen deformitelerin onarımı için otojen kemik greftleri veya alloplastik materyaller kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmamızda kliniğimize başvuran toplam 14 hastada kalvarial kemik grefti ile frontal bölge deformitelerinin onarımını ve sonuçlarını tartıştık.
144-148

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Hardstey R.A., Marsh JL., craniofacial oniay bone graf-ting: A prospective evaluation of graft morphoİogy, ori-entation and embryonic origin. Pîast. Reconstr. Surg. 85:5,(1990). .
2. HecklerFR.: Discussion of frontal sinüs fractures. Gui-delines to Management of Plastic Reconstructive Sur-gery. Past. Reconstr. Surg. 80:509 (1987).
3. Jackson IT. : Classification and treatment of orbiotozy-gomatic and orbitoethymoid fractures: The place of bone grafting and plale fiksation. Clin. Plast. Surg. 16:77, 1989
4. Konuralp A., Çerkeş N., Bilgin A., Periorbital ve frontal bölge rckonsültas yon unda serbest kalvarial kemik greftlerinin uygulanışı. Türk Piast. Cer. Derg.g. 1:1,24 1993.
5. Kozak J, Voska P.: Reconstruction of the frontal region with skuU bone grafts. Açta Chir. Plast. 35:36 43 (1993).
6. La Trenta GS., McCharthy JG, Breitbart AS.: The role of rigit skeletal fixation in bone graft augmentation of the craniofacial skelaton. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 84:578, (1989).
7. Manşon PN., Crawiey WA., Hoopes JE.: Frontal eroni-oplasty: Risk factors and choisc of cranial vaull reconstructive material. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 77:888 (1986).
8. Palchum VT., Lapchenko AS., Lanlsov II., Ritter SP.: Plastic surgery of the frontanasal anasiomosis using a hydroxyapatite prosthesis. Vestn. Otorhinolaringol. 3:25 (1994),
9. Ponte FS., Bottini DJ., Valentini V.: Surgical treatment of hemangioma of bones of the orbitozygomatic region Minerva Stomatol 43:365 (1994).
10. Spcar SL., Wiegering CE.: Temporal fossa bone grafts: A new technique in craniofacial surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 79:531 (1987).
11. Shumrick KA., Smith CP.: The use of cancelous bone for ffönfâl"sinüs ööTifatrâYiön'M
bony defects. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head-Neck-Surg. 120:1003 (1994).
12. Thallemer J., Draft W.: Personal experience with lono-cem in head andneck surgery. HNO 41:91 (1991).
13. Van Gooi AV. Preformed polymethylmethacryiate crani-oplasties: Report of 45 cases. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 13:2 (1985).
14. Wolfe SA. Frontal cranioplasty: Risk factors and choice of cranial vault reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 77.901 (1986).
15. Wolfe SA., Johnson P.: Frontal sinüs injuries: Primary care and management of iate complications. Piast. Reconstr. Surg. 82:781 (1988).
16. Zins JE., Whitaker LA.: Membranous versus endochond-ral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 72:778 (1983).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com