You are here

Home » Content

TELESKOPİK SİSTEMLER

TELESCOPIC SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1998

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Telescopic systems have been used in the prosthetic treatment for many years and successful results have been achieved both functionally and esthetically. The use of dentures with telescopic systems have been widespread with, the development of the conical croztms and nowadays they are successfully used in the fixation of maxilla and mandibula fractures, in increasing vertical dimension, in oligodonti, mic-rodonti and cleft plate cases and for the implant supported prothesis. The development of the telescopic systems, their indications and basic principles, advantages and disadvantages and the results of the case reports of telescopic systems have been reported in this article. Clinical experience, careful selection of the cases and die accurate construction of denture with the conical crown retained result in superior advantages. The patient can experience a comfort similar to the fixed partial dentures, better occlusalforce distribution and the protection of the surrounding tissues can be provided and the lost esthetic, phonetic and functional pro perti.es can be regained. Although their cost is quite expensive, the fact that the adjustments needed after the use of the formerly constructed denture can be performed easily, İs one of the important features.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Teleskopik sistemler protetik tedavide yıllarca kullanılmış ve gerek fonksiyonel gerekse estetik açıdan başarılı sonuçlar alınmıştır. Konuş kuronların geliştirilmesiyle birlikte, teleskopik sistemli protezlerin kullanımı yaygınlaşmış ve günümüzde; dikey boyutun Yükseltilmesinde, çene kırıklarının tespitinde, oligodontia mikrodonti, yarık damak, implant üst yapı protezlerinde başarıyla uygulanmaktadır. Makalede teleskopik sistemlerin gelişimi, uygulama alanları, prensipleri, getirdiği avantaj-dezavantajlar, problemler ve vak'a takiplerinin sonuçlan incelenmiştir. Klinik tecrübe ile birlikte özellikle konuş kuronlu protezlerin doğru vak'alarda titiz yapımı sonucu; sabit protezlerin uygu-lanamıyacağı durumlarda hastaya sabit proteze yakın konforun sağlanabileceği, kuvvet dağılımının düzenlenmesi ile kalan diş ve çevre dokuların sağlığının korunabileceği, hastaya kaybettiği estetik, fonetik ve fonksiyonel özelliklerin sağlanabileceği, maliyetleri yüksek olmakla birlikte zaman içerisinde gerekebilecek yeni düzenlemelerin mevcut protez üzerinde yapılabilmesi nedeniyle ekonomik hale gelebileceği düşünülmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-teleskopik-sistemler.pdf
  • 2
71
76
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Akagavva V, Seo T, Ohkawa S, Tsur H. A new telescopic crown system using a soldered horizontal pin for removable partial dentures. JProsthetDent 1993: 69:228-31.
2. Belgcr L. Kuron köprü protezleri, Istanbul, Prof Dr. Nazım Terzioğlu Basım Atölyesi 1986: 135-51, 222-33.
3. Bergman B, Erİcson A. Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Jnt J Prosthodont 1996: 9:533-38.
4. Besimo C, Graber G, Schaffner T. Hybrid prothedsc-he implantat-getragene Suprastrukturen iin zhannlosen Un-terkiefer. Teil I: Fallplanung. ZWR 1991: 100:12-16.
5. Besimo C, Graber G, Schaffner T. Hybridprotheuse-he implantat-getragene Suprastrukturen im zahnlosen Un-terkiefer. Konuskronen und Hülsen-Stift Susteme auf Ha-Ti-Implantaten. ZWR1991: 100:70-6.
6. Branwarth J. Mehr Aesthetik im Frontzahnbereich
Teles kop-Prothetik im Wandel der Zeit. Dent Labor 1994: 1:43-9.
7. Carlson GE. Hedegard B, Koivumaa KK. W. Studies in partial dental prosthesis: Final results of a 4-year longitudinal investigation of dentogingivally supported partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1965: 23:443-49.
8.
Çuhadaroğlu İ. Kuron köprü protezi. Ankara: AÜ Basımevi, 1977: 159-173.
9.
Diedrichs G. Galvano-AuGenteleskope in der direkten Technik. Die Quintessenz 1991: 1:49-55.
10. Ericson A, Nilsson B, Bergman B. Clinical results in patienis provided with conical crown retained dentures. IntJ Prosthodont 1990: 3:513-21.
11. Garnet W, Adam P, Reidier W. Nach undersuchun-gen von teilprothesen mit konuskronen nach KH Korber. Dtsch Za/marstf Z 1983: 38:998-100112. Gasser F. Parallel, conical or resilient telescopes. QuintIMİ977: 8:43-4.
13. Heners M, Walther W. Klinische Bewahrung der Ko-nuskrone als perioprothetisches Konstruktions Element-ei-ne langzeitstudie. Dfccft Zahnarzü Z 1988: 43:525-29.
14. Heners M, Walther W. Die prognose von Pfeilerzah-nen bei stark reduzierten rest zahnbestand. Dtsch Zahnarzü Z1990: 45:579-81.
15. Hofmann M, Ludwig P. Die teleskopierende Totalp-rothese im stark reduzierten Lueckengebiss. Dtsch Zahnarzü Z1973: 28:2-17.
16. Hulten J, Tîllström B, Nilner K. Long term clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures. Swed DentJ 1993: 17:225-234.
17. Isaacson GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. JProstket Dent 1969: 22: 436-48.
18. Körber K. Konuskronen-Teleskope, Einfuhrung in Klinik und Technik. 3. Aufl, Hüthig, Heidelberg 1973: 74¬100.
19. Körber K. Konuskronen. Das rationelle Teleskopsy-stem einführung in Klinik und Technik. Hüthig, Heidelberg 1988: 64-153.
20. Langer A. Telescopic retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981: 45: 37-43.
21. Langer A. Tooth-supported telescope restorations. / Prosthet Dent 1981: 45:515-20.
22. LenzJ. Ein matcmatisches Modeli zur Berechnung des Haft-und Festigkeitsverhaltens von konischbaren Teles-kopkronen. Dtsch Zahnarzü Z 1982: 37:7-8.
23. LenzJ, Schindler HJ, Pelka H. Das konische Teilte-leskop und andere Modİfikationen der keramikverblende-ten Konuskrone. Dent Labor 1992: 12:2087-95.
24. LenzJ, Schindler HJ, Pelka H. Fallbeispiele zur An-wendung modifizierter konischer Halteelemente. Dent Labor 1993:1:79-84.
25. Masumi S, Kido Kuribayashi M, Tanaka K, Morikawa M. Removable prosdiesis with konus telescope following partial mandibulectomy.J Kyushu DentSoc 1995: 48:56.
26. Miller PA. Complete dentures supported by natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1958: 8:924-28.
27. Molin M, Bergman B, Ericson A. A clinical evaluation of conical crown retained dentures.yfVostfierZ>CTirl993: 70: 251-6.
28. Mueninghoff AL, Johnson HM. Fixed removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1982: 48:547-50.
29. Okhawa S, Okane H, Nagasawa T, Tsuru H. Changes in retention of various telescope crown assemblies over long-term use. J Prosthet Dent 1990: 64:153-8.
30. Perel ML. Telescope dentures./İYorf/ıeı Den* 1973: 29:151-6.
31. Perel ML. Dental implantology and prostheses. Philadelphia: JBLippincott Company 1977: 145.
32. Pröbster L, Wall G, Weber H. Aufguflverfahren für gcschlossene Teleskop und Konuskronen. Den Labor 1991: 39:1223-7.
33. Roshenberg LL. Overlay dentures for the cleft-palate paitent./iVos*oe*Denf 1977: 37: 327-9.
34. Schindler H, LenzJ, Rupprecht U, Pelka H. Die Konuskrone mit Fügekraftbegrenzung. Dent Labor 1996: 3:397¬402.
35. Shiba A. The conical double-crown telescopic removable periodontic prosthesis. St Louis, Ishiyaku Euro America Inc 1993: 4-22.
36. Stark H. Untersuchungen über die Mundhygiene bei Tragern von Teleskopprothesen. Dtsch Zaftnarztf 1993: 48:570-72.
37. Walther W. Risk of endodontic treatment after insertion of conical crown retained dentures: a longitudinal study. EndodDentTraumatol 1995: 11:27-31.
38. Weaver JD. Telescopic copings in restorative den-ûslry. J Prosthet Dent\989: 61:429-33.
39.
Yenigûl M. Konus kuronlardaki yükseklik, yan alan, açı faktörlerinin tutucu güce etkisinin deneysel analizi ve klinik uygulaması. Ankara, Doçentlik Tezi 1978.
40. Yalısove IL. Crown and sleeve-coping retainers for removable partial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1966: 16:1069¬85.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com