You are here

Home » Content

ELEKTRONİK OY VERME SİSTEMLERİNDE GÜVENLİK: DENEYİMLER VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN ÖNERİLER

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Electronic voting systems are no longer a theoretical matter and they have been successfully used in elections and referendums in some countries. With such systems some problems of paper ballots can be eliminated easily. However, these systems have their own security problems. In this article, first an evaluation of the India, Brazil and Venezuela examples within the context of the criteria for voting systems for just elections is made. Next, some suggestions about the electronic voting systems and the voting process that can be used for a secure and problem free manner application of such systems are proposed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Elektronik oy verme sistemleri teorik bir konu olmaktan çıkmış olup bazı ülkelerdeki seçim ve referandumlarda başarı ile kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu tür sistemler kullanılarak kağıt oy pusulalarında görülen bazı sakıncalar kolaylıkla giderilebilir. Ancak bu sistemlerin de kendilerine özgü güvenlik sorunları vardır. Bu makalede önce adil bir seçim için oy verme sistemlerinin sağlaması gereken ölçütler bağlamında Hindistan, Brezilya ve Venezüella örneklerinin değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Daha sonra da ülkemizde bu tür sistemlerinin seçimlerde güvenle ve sorunsuz uygulanabilmesi için kullanılabilecek elektronik oy verme aygıtları ve oy verme süreci ile ilgili bazı öneriler sunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-elektronik-oy-verme-sistemlerinde-guvenlik-deneyimler-turkiye-icin-oneriler.pdf
  • 3
32-47
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ACE (2006). Electoral Knowledge Network, http://www.aceproject.org/.
Akın, M. (2002a), “Bilgisayarlı Oy Verme Sistemleri,” Belgelerle Türk Tarihi Dergisi Dün/Bugün/Yarın, 65,
74-80.
Akın, M. (2002b) “Seçimlerde Elektronik Oy Kullanma,” İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 401-415.
Anon (2005). “Uso de las máquinas SAES para las Elecciones Municipales y Parroquiales 2005”, http://www.
smartmatic. com/infografia_01. htm.
Anon., (2006). “Elections in Brasil”,Wikipedia,.
BM (2005). Human Development Report 2005.
Carrier, M. A. (20055). "Vote Counting, Technology, and Unintended Consequences", St. John’s Law Review,
79, 645-687.
Chaum, D. (2004). "Secret-Ballot Receipts: True Voter-Verifiable Elections", CryptoBytes, 7, 2, 13-26.
ECI (2004). “Handbook for Polling Agents (At Elections where Electronic Voting Machines are used), Election
Commission of India.
Feldman, A. J., Halderman, A. ve E. W. Felten (2006). Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting
Machine, Teknik Rapor, Princeton University.
Gonggrijp, R. et al (2006). Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis, Rapor, Wij
vertrouwen stemcomputers niet.
Hausmann, R ve R. Rigobon (2004). “En busca del cisne negro: Análisis de la evidencia estadística sobre fraude
electoral en Venezuela”, http://www. proveo. org/hausmann. pdf.
He, M., Almeida, R. ve E. Gissoni (2002). “National Semiconductor and Unisys Equip Brazil with New Voting
Machines for Fast and Accurate Election Results in the Fall”,
http://www.national.com/news/item/0,1735,757,00.html.
Jones, D. W., (2005). "Threats to Voting Systems", Developing an Analysis of Threats to Voting Systems
Çalıştayı, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Kabay, M. E. (2000).“Easter Eggs and the Trusted Computing Base”, Network World Security Newsletter.
Lauer, T. W. (2004)."The Risk of e-Voting", Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2, 177-186.
Lehigh-Muhlenberg, (2006). 2006 Survey of Public Attitudes Toward Electronic Voting in Pennsylvania,
Ana Bulgular Raporu, Lehigh University/Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.
Mercuri, R. T. (2002). “A Better Ballot box?”, IEEE Spectrum, 39, 10
Mercuri, R. T. ve L. J. Camp. (2004). “The Code of Elections”, Comm. of the ACM, 47, 10, 53-57.
Norden, L. et al (2006). The Machinery of Democracy: Protecting Elections in An Electronic World, Rapor,
Voting Rights & Elections Series, Brennan Center For Justice At NYU School of Law.
NSF (2001). Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, Internet
Policy Institute.
Rezende, P. A. D. , "Electronic Voting Systems: Is Brazil ahead of its time?", CryptoBytes, C. 7, No. 2, s. 1-7,
2004.
Saltman, R. G. (2006). Independent Verification: Essential Action to Assure Integrity in the Voting
Process, Teknik Rapor, NIST.
Sipser, M. (2005). Introduction to the Theory of Computation, Thomson,
USEAC (2005a), “Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, .I.
USEAC (2005b), “Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, II.
Weiner, E. (2004). “The Bombay Ballot, What the U. S. can learn from India's electronic voting machines”,
Slate, http://www. slate. com/id/2107388/,.
YSK (2004). Karar No:2002, Resmi Gazete, 26.5.2004.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com