You are here

ERROR DATA ANALYZING OF THE INTEGRATION OF THE SENSORS WITH DIFFERENT MEASURING BOUNDARIES IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Data accuracy is important to determine a target. Mobile robots are used in dynamic environments. At dynamic environments, the noise factor and situation of objects are changeable. A sensor may not work properly in dynamic environmenst. The noise factor affects getting accurate data negatively. These factors depend on sensor types. Therefore, one of the goals of sensor integration i, to quench one or more sensor disadvantages by using other sensor or sensors, get more accurate and reliable data, reduce noise factor, determine and analyze more options of target or targets. Every sensor has a measurement range and this range changes according to the sensor types. The sensor has two boundaries; lower boundary and upper boundary. It is usually zero below the lower boundary. Above the upper boundary it keeps the maximum output value and Is usually stable. Essentially, the sensor data over the range called error data. If the value to be measured in an integration composed of the sensors is out of ranges of some sensors, the data of these sensors is to be eliminated. Eliminated data are bad data. Error data analyzing methods are used to determine bad data. Chauvenet’s criterion is one of these methods. A new model eliminating the sensor data is developed. The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determine the data is over range or not. The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determine if the data is over range or not.
439-442

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Katti Facelli, Andre C.P.L.f. de Carvalho,
Solange O. Rezende, “Combining Intelligent
Techniques For Sensor Fusion”, Proceedings
of the 9th International Conference on Neural
Information Processing (ICONIP’02), Vol.4
[2] Zou Yi, Ho Yeong Khing, Chua Chin Seng,
Zhou Xiao Wei, “Multi-Ultrasonic Sensor
Fusion for Mobile Robots”, Proceedings of
the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium
2000 Dearborn (MI), USA, October3-5,
2000
[3] Phabhakar S. Naidu, Sensor Array Signal
Processing, Florida: CRC Press, 2001
[4] Siegfried Martens, Paolo Gaudiano and Ga,il
A. Carpenter, “Mobile Robot sensor
integration with fuzzy ARTMAP”,
Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE
ISIC/CIRA/ISA3 Joint Conference
Galthersburg, MD, September 14-17, 1998
[5] Jun Miura, Yoshiro Negishi, and Yoshiaki
Shirai, “Mobile Robot Map Generation by
Integrating Omnidirectional Stereo and
Laser Range Finder”, Proceedings of the
2002 IEEE/RSJ Inti. Conference on
Intelligent Robos and Systems EPFL,
Lusanne, Switzerland, October 2002
[6] Hugh W. Coleman and W. Glenn Steele,
Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis
for Engineers, Second Edition, ISBN 0-
471-12146-0, Copyright 1999 by John
Wiley & Sons, Wiley-IEEE, New York
[7] Benjamin Peirce, “Criterion for the rejection
of doubtful observations”, Astronomical
Journal, vol. 2, iss. 45, p. 161-163, 1852
[8] Stephen M. Ross, “Peirce’s Criterion for the
Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data”,
Journal of Engineering Technology, Fall
2003

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com