You are here

THE EFFECT OF BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURAL NATIVIZATION ON READING COMPREHENSION AND VOCABULARY INFERENCE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aimed to investigate the influence of background knowledge and cultural familiarity on reading comprehension and vocabulary inference of Turkish 7th grade students in public primary schools in Turkey. For this purpose; two texts, one of which was based on the authentic culture and the other one based on the nativized version, a vocabulary test and parallel reading comprehension tests were developed by the researcher. To carry out the research, experimental and control groups were arranged and reading comprehension texts & tests were administered to the subjects in both groups. Additionally, experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups took a multiple-choice vocabulary test. It was concluded that cultural nativization of the text and elements related with background knowledge in the nativized text had a facilitative effect on comprehension of the short passages and inferring the meaning of the unknown words by the students. It was observed that EG students, who read the nativized version of the text got higher scores both in reading comprehension and vocabulary tests compared to CG students who read the denativized(authenticated) version. The findings of the study are expected to bear some implications for English material designers and EFL teachers.
188-198

REFERENCES

References: 

Al-Issa, A. (2006). Schema Theory and L2 reading comprehension: implication for teaching. Journal of College
Teaching & Learning, 3, 7, 41-48.
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Alptekin, C. (2002).The effects of cultural knowledge on EFL reading comprehension. Opening plenary speech at
International Balkan ELT Conference. Edirne, Trakya University.
Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34, 494–
508.
Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: A Study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Cakir. I. (2006). Developing Cultural Awareness In Foreign Language Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of
Distance Education, 7, 154-161.
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second
language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1, 81–92.
Carrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553–573.
Chihara, T., Sakurai, T., & Oller J. W. (1989). Background and culture as factors in EFL reading comprehension.
Language Testing 6(2), 143-151.
Erten I.H. & Razi S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 21, 60-77.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London, England: Longman.
Fillmore, C.J. (1980). The need for a frame Semantics within linguistics. In Statistical Methods in Linguistics.
Stockholm: Skriptor.
Hinkel, E. (2001). Building Awareness and Practical Skills to Facilitate Cross-Cultural Communication. In CelceMurcia, M. (Ed.) Teaching English as Second or Foreign Language (3rd edition). USA: Heinle and Heinle.
Jalilehvand, M. (2012). The Effects of Text Length and Picture on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL
Students. Asian Social Science Journal, 8, 329-337.
Jalilifar A. R. & Assi R. (2008). The Role of Cultural Nativization in Comprehension of Short Stories in EFL Reading
Contexts. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 26, 62-79.
Ketchum, E. M. (2006). The cultural baggage of second language reading: An approach to understanding.
Foreign Language Annals, 39, 22–42.
Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt D. & Bluth G. (1980). Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension
of Ninth-grade Students. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 72-102.
Peck, D. (1998). Teaching Culture: Beyond Language. Yale: New Haven Teachers Institute.
Politzer, R. (1959). Developing Cultural Understanding through Foreign Language Study. Report of the Fifth
Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Teaching, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University
Press.
Pulido, D. (2004). The effect of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading, The
Reading Matrix, 4(2), 20-53.
Rashidi. N. & Soureshjani K.H. (2011). The effect of teaching culturally-based texts on the Persian English as a
foreign language (EFL) learners’ motivation and reading performance. Journal of Languages and Culture, 2, 141-
147.
Razi, S. (2004). The effects of cultural schema and reading activities on reading comprehension. In M. Singhal
(Ed.) Proceedings of the 1st international online conference on second and foreign language teaching and
research, (pp. 276-293). USA: The Reading Matrix. Retrieved September 13, 2007 from
http://www.readingmatrix.com/conference/pp/proceedings/razi.pdf
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, W.E. Brewer (eds.)
Theoritical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sapir, E. (1970). Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: Rupert Hart-Davis.
Sasaki, M. (2000). Effects of cultural schemata on students’ test taking processes for cloze tests: A multiple data
source approach. Language Testing, 17(1), 85-114.
Schankd, R.C. & Abelson R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Sharp, A. (2002). Chinese L1 Schoolchildren Reading in English: The Effects of Rhetorical Patterns. Reading in a
Foreign Language, 14 (2), 1-20.
Stanovich, K. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York:
The Guilford Press.
Taloon, M. (2006). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Tannen D. (1978). The effects of expectations on conversation. Discourse Processes,1(2), 203-209.
Zhang. X. (2008). The Effects of Formal Schema on Reading Comprehension—An Experiment with Chinese EFL
Readers. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 13, 197-214.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com