You are here

Home » Content

YENİ BİR DIŞ TİCARET TEORİSİ OLARAK PORTER’IN REKABETÇİ ÜSTÜNLÜKLER TEORİSİ’NİN YAPISI

THE STRUCTURE OF PORTER’S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE THEORY AS A NEW FOREIGN TRADE THEORY

Journal Name:

  • Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Theories which are describing the causes of the trade between countries are differentiated from past to present because of the development in the information and technical fields. The purpose of this study is discussing the Porter’s “Competitive Advantage Theory” about does can be a new trade theory. Study’s method is searching literature. In spite of the criticism of Porter’s theory in thought, method and application perspectives, it has been also defending views of the theory. It can be said that the theory is reveal a comprehensive model in describing today’s competitive advantage.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ülkeler arasında gerçekleştirilen ticaretin nedenlerini açıklamaya yönelik ortaya konulan teorilerin geçmişten günümüze kadar uzanan süreçte farklılıklar göstermesinin temelinde, bilgi ve teknik alanındaki ilerlemelerin önemli rolü olduğu söylenebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Porter’ın “Rekabetçi Üstünlükler Teorisi”nin yeni bir dış ticaret teorisi olarak irdelenmesidir. Çalışmada izlenilen yöntem genel bir literatür taramasıdır. Porter’ın teorisi düşünce, metot ve uygulama yönlerinden eleştirilmesine karşın, teoriyi savunan görüşlerde vardır. Teorinin günümüzdeki rekabetçi üstünlüklerin açıklanmasında kapsamlı bir model ortaya koyduğu söylenebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_25823_4_pp_81-98.pdf
  • 5
81-98
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

ASLAN, N. ve N. TERZİ. (2006). “Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) Teorisi ve Teorinin
Değerlendirmesi”. Marmara Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 21(1): 1-14.
ATİK, H. (2005), Yenilik ve Ulusal Rekabet Gücü. (1. Basım). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
AYDINONAT, N. E. (2007), Modern Uluslararası İktisat Teorisinin Kökenleri, İkinci Baskı, Siyasal
Yayınevi, Ankara.
BAIMAN, R. (2010), “The Infeasibility of Free Trade in Classical Theory: Ricardo’s Comparative
Advantage Parable has no Solution”, Review of Political Economy, 22(3): 419-437.
BAYRAKTUTAN, Y. (2003), “Bilgi ve Uluslararası Ticaret Teorileri”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Dergisi, 4(2): 175-186.
BUCKLEY, P. J. (2009). “Business History and International Business”. Business History, 51(3): 307-333.
CHACHOLIADES, M. (1990). International Economics. McGraw–Hill International Editions.
CLARK, Don P. (2012), “Scale Economies and Trade”, Applied Economic Letters, 19: 965-968.
K. Halil ARIÇ | The Structure of Porter’s Competitive Advantage Theory as a New Foreign Trade Theory
Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty
KAU EASF Journal | Vol 4 * Issue 5 * Year 2013
96
DAVIES, H. ve P. ELLIS (2000), “Porter’s Competitive Advantage of Nations: Time For The Final
Judgement”, Journal of Management Studies, 37(8): 1189-1213.
DUNNING, J. H. (1993), “Internationalizing Porter’s Diamond”, Management International Review, Vol.
33: 7-15.
ELMSLIE, B. (1994), “Positive Feedback Mechanisms in Adam Smith’s Theories of International Trade”,
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1(2), 253-271.
ERKEKOĞLU, H. (2008). İmalat Sanayi Rekabet Gücü Araştırması: Kayseri Örneği. Ankara: Palme
Yayıncılık
ERKÖK Y. Ş. (1992), Dış Ticaret Kuramlarının Evrimi, Gazi Üniversitesi Yayın No: 178, İİBF Yayın No:
57, Ankara.
GIRI, R. (1998), “The Heckscher-Ohlin Model” İnternet Adresi:http://classes7.com/Chapter-4-The-
Heckscher-Ohlin-Model-download-w34577.pdf : 1-22.
GÖKMENOĞLU, M. S. ; M. AKAL ve R. ALTUNIŞIK (2012), “Ulusal Rekabet Gücünü Belirleyen
Faktörler Üzerine Değerlendirmeler”, Rekabet Dergisi, 13(4): 3-43.
GRANT, R. M. (1991). “Porter’s ‘Competitive Advantage of Nations’: An Assessment”. Strategic
Management Journal, 12(7): 535-548.
GROSSE, R. and J. N. BEHRMAN. (1992). “Theory in International Business”. Transnational Corporations,
1(1), 93-126.
HANSEN, J. (2011), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Book Review, Journal of International
Business, Vol. 3, Issue 1: 107-133.
JONES, R. W. (1956-1957), “Factor Proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem”, The Review of
Economic Studies, 24(1): 1-10.
KARLUK, R. (2002). Uluslararası Ekonomi: Teori ve Politika. (6. Basım), İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
KETELS, Christian H. M. (2006), “Michael Porter’s Competitiveness Framework – Recent Learnings and
New Research Priorties”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2): 115-136.
KİBRİTÇİOĞLU, A. (1998), “Porter’ın Rekabetçi Avantajlar Yaklaşımı ve İktisat Kuramı”, İnternet Adresi:
http://edoc.bibliothek.unihalle.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/HALCoRe_d....
pdf : 1-10.
KJELDSEN-KRAGH, S. (2002). International Economics. Copenhagen Business School Press.
KRUGMAN, P. R. and M. OBSTFELD. (1994). International Economics: Theory and Policy. (Third
Edition). Haper Collins College Publishers.
KUMBARACIBAŞI, O. (1973), Dış Ticaret Teorisi ve Uluslararası Ekonomi, Ankara İktisadi ve Ticari
İlimler Akademisi Neşriyat ve Sosyal Yardım Bürosu, San Matbaası, Ankara.
Yeni Bir Dış Ticaret Teorisi Olarak Porter’ın Rekabetçi Üstünlükler Teorisi’nin Yapısı | K. Halil ARIÇ
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
KAÜ İİBF Dergisi | Cilt 4 * Sayı 5 * Yıl 2013
97
MANESCHI, A. (2008), “How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative
Advantage?”, Southern Economic Journal, 74(4): 1167-1176.
MYINT, H. (1977), “Adam Smith’s Theory of International Trade in the Perspective of Economic
Development”, Economica, August, 33(175): 231-248.
NEVEN, D. and C. L. M. DROGE (2001), “A Diamond fort he Poor? Assessing Porter’s Diamond Model
fort he Analysis of Agro-Food Clusters in the Developing Countries”, İnternetAdresi:http://www.
agrifood.info/Agrifood/members/Congress/Congress2001Papers/Symposium/Neven.pdf,
O’SHAUGHNESSY, N. (1997), “The Idea of Competitive Advantage and the Ideas of Michael Porter”,
Strategic Change, Vol. 6: 73-83.
ÖZ, Ö. (2002), “Assessing Porter’s Framework for National Advantage: The Case of Turkey”, Journal of
Business Research, 55: 509 – 515.
PORTER, E. M. (1998), The Competitive Advantages of Nations, New Edition, Palgrave.
POSNER, M. V. (1961), “International Trade and Technical Change”, Oxford Economic Papers, New
Series, 13(3): 323-341.
RUGMAN, A. M. and A. VERBEKE (1993), “How to Operationalize Porter’s Diamond of International
Competitiveness”, The International Executive, Vol. 35(4): 283-299.
SALVATORE, D. (2001), International Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (7th edition), USA.
SEYİDOĞLU, H. (2003). Uluslararası İktisat: Teori Politika ve Uygulama, (15. Basım). İstanbul: Güzem
Can Yayınları No:20.
SMIT, A. J. (2010). “The Competitive Advantage of Nations: Is Porter’s Diamond Framework a New
Theory That Explains the International Competitiveness of Countries?”. Southern African Business
Review, 14(1): 105-130
SMITH, A. (1776). Wealth of Nations, Prometheus Books, New York, 1991.
ÜNSAL, E. M. (2005), Uluslararası İktisat: Teori Politika ve Açık Ekonomi Makro İktisadı, Birinci Baskı,
Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık.
VERNON, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190-207.
WALTER, T. (1997), The World Economy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
WELLS, Louıs T. JR. (1968), “A Product Life Cycle for International Trade?”, Journal of Marketing, 32,
Jul.: 1-6.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com