You are here

Home » Content

YOZLAŞMANIN SOSYAL VE KÜLTÜREL ETKİLERİ: BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Journal Name:

  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Corruption which is defined as public officer's abuse of public property for his private interest is a case that has been seen in almost every society throughout the history. As a result of the factors like emergences of institutions which attempt to measure the level of corruption correctly and reliably, and start of fight of the World Bank and IMF against corruption, it began to become a current issue more particularly in 90s. The studies carried out in this direction show that corruption affects democracy, freedom of opinion, human development and welfare negatively. Countries can help with formation of a society of more democracy, and that of higher freedom of opinion, welfare and human development.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kamu çalışanının özel çıkarları için kamu malını kötüye kullanması olarak tanımlanan yozlaşma, tarih boyunca hemen her toplumda görülen bir olgudur. Yozlaşma düzeyini doğru ve güvenilir bir biçimde ölçmeye çalışan kurumların ortaya çıkması, Dünya Bankası ve Uluslararası Para Fonu gibi organizasyonların yozlaşmayla mücadeleye başlaması gibi faktörler nedeniyle, yozlaşma özellikle 90'lı yıllarla birlikte daha fazla gündeme gelmeye başlamıştır. Bu yönde yapılan çalışmalar göstermektedir ki; yozlaşma demokrasi, fikir özgürlüğü, insani gelişmişlik ve refah gibi değişkenleri negatif olarak etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürdeki çalışmaların bulgularına dayanarak, yozlaşmanın azaltılması durumunda ülkelerin demokrasi, düşünce özgürlüğü, refah ve insani gelişmişlik düzeyini yükseltebileceğini ortaya koymaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 2013-2.pdf
  • 1
15-25
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AKÇAY, S. [2006), "Corruption and Human Development", Cato Journal, 26 (1), ss. 29-48. ALATAS, V., CAMERON, L., CHAUDHURI, A., ERKAL, N., GANGADHARAN, L. [2009),
"Gender, Culture, and Corruption: Insights from an Experimental Analysis,
Southern Economic Journal, 75 [3), ss. 663-680. AMPRATWUM, E. F. [2008), "The Fight Aganist Corruption and Its Implications for
Development in Developing and Transition Economies", Journal of Money
Laundering Control, 11[1), ss. 76-87. BOHARA, A., MITCHELL, N. J., MITTENDORFF, C. F. [2004), "Compound Democracy and
the Control of Corruption: A Cross-Country Investigation", The Policy Studies
Journal, 32 (4), ss. 481-499. BRAKING, S. [2007), Corruption and Development: The Anti-Corruption Campaigns,
Tottenham: St Martin Pres. BRUNETTI, A. and WEDER B. [2003), "A Press is Bad News for Corruption", Journal of
Public Economics, 87, ss. 1801-1824. CHANG, E. C. ve GOLDEN, M. A. [2006), "Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and
Corruption", British Journal of Political Science, 37, ss. 115-137. CHOWDHURY, S. K. [2004), "The Effect of Democracy and Press Freedom on Corruption:
An Empirical Test", Economic Letters, 85, ss. 93-101. ER, M. (2008), "Corruption from the Islamic Perspective: Some Recommendations for
the MENA Region", International Journal and Middle Eastern Finance and
Mangement, 1 (1), ss. 31-51. GRAEFF, P. ve MEHLKOP, G. [2003), "The Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption:
Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Conutries", European Journal of Political
Economy, 19, ss. 605-620. KANGLE, R. P. [1972). The Kautiliya Arthasastra. Part II. Bombay University,Mumbai. KAYRAK, M. (2008), "Evolving Challenges for Supreme Audit Institutions in Struggling
with Corruption", Journol of Financial Crime, 15 (1), ss. 60-70. MAURO, P. (1998), "Corruption and Composition of Government Expenditure", Journal
of Public Economics, 69, ss. 263-279. MONTİNOLA, G. ve JACKMAN, R. W. (2002), "Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country
Study", British Journal of Political Science, 32, ss. 147-170. NAS, T. F., PRICE, A1BERT C, WEBER, C. T. (1986), "A Policy-Oriented Theory of
Corruption", The Amerikan Politikal Science Review, 80 (1), ss. 107-119. PARK, H. (2003), "Determinants of Corruption: A Cross-National Analysis", The
Multinational Business Review, 11 (2), ss. 29-48. SANDHOLTZ, W. ve KOETZLE, W. (2000), "Accounting for Corruption: Economic
Structure, Democracy, and Trade", International Studies Quarterly, 44, ss. 31-50. SELEIM, A. ve BONTIS, N. (2009), "The Reletionship Between Culture and Corruption: A
Cross-National Study", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10 [1), ss. 165-184. SUNG, H.-En (2002), "A Convergence Approach to the ,Analiysis of Political Corruption: A
Cross-National Study", Crime, Law & Social Change, 38, ss. 137-160. SUNG, H.-En (2003), "Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited",
Social Forces, 82, ss. 702-723. SUNG, H.-En (2004), "Democracy and Political Corruption: A Cross-National
Comparison", Crime, Law & Social Change, 41, ss. 179-194. TREISMAN, D. (2000), "The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study", Journal of
Public Economics, 76, ss. 399-457.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com