You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÇEVRE SORUNLARINA KARŞI DUYARLILIKLARI

PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ SENSIBILITIES TOWARDS ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to determine pre-service teachers’ sensibility towards environmental problems. The sample of the study consists of 235 pre-service teachers, 118 males and 117 females, enrolling to different departments of education faculty at Amasya University. The data obtained from the study were analyzed by independent sapmles t-test and one-way analysis of variance. The results of the study revealed that there is no significant difference (t(232) = .758, p = .45) between female and male pre-service teachers’ with respect to their environmental sensibility levels. The results also showed that although pre-service teachers’ enrolling to different grade levels differ from each (F(3, 229) = 2.664, p = .04) other with respect to their environmental sensibility levels, there are not any significant differences (F(8, 226) = 1.44, p = .18) among pre-service teachers enrolling different departments.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu cal..ma o.retmen adaylar.n.n cevre sorunlar.na kar.. duyarl.l.klar.n. belirlemek amac.yla yap.lm..t.r. Cal..maya Amasya Universitesi E.itim Fakultesinin farkl. bolumlerinde o.renim goren 118fi erkek, 117fs. bayan olmak uzere toplam 235 o.retmen aday. kat.lm..t.r. Cal..madan elde edilen veriler, parametrik testlerden ba..ms.z de.i.kenler icin t-testi ve tek yonlu varyans testi ile analiz edilmi.tir. Analizlerden elde edilen sonuclar bayan ve erkek o.renciler aras.nda cevre sorunlar.na duyarl.l.klar. ac.s.ndan istatistiksel olarak anlaml. bir farkl.l.k olmad...n. (t(232) = .758, p = .45) gostermi.tir. Ayr.ca, cal..madan elde edilen sonuclar o.retmen adaylar. aras.nda s.n.f duzeylerine gore anlaml. farkl.l.klar oldu.unu gosterirken (F(3, 229) = 2.664, p = .04, k.smi ƒÅ2 = .03) farkl. bolumlere gore istatistiksel olarak anlaml. farkl.l.klar olmad...n. (F(8, 226) = 1.44, p = .18) ortaya koymu.tur
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ogretmen-adaylarinin-cevre-sorunlarina-karsi-duyarliliklari.pdf
  • 1
121-134
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Brown, L. (1991). The new world order. In State of the world 1991: A Worldwatch Institute
Report on progress toward a sustainable society (3-20). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
2. Brundtland, G. (1988). Introduction: Civilization in crisis. In F. Barnaby (Ed.), The Gaia
peace atlas. New York: Doubleday.
3. Buell, F. (2004). From apocalypse to a way of life: Environmental crisis in the American
century. New York: Routledge.
4. Cairns, J. (2002). Sustainability and sacred values. Ethics in Science and Environmental
Politics, 13, 15-27.
5. Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources
of environmental sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21. 6. Chiras, D. D. (1992). Lessons from nature: Learning to live sustainably on the Earth.
Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
7. Çabuk, B. & Karacaoğlu, Ö.C. (2003). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çevre duyarlılıklarının
incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1-2), 189-198.
8. Erol, G.H. & Gezer, K. (2006). Prospective elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward
environment and environmental problems. International Journal of Environmental and
Science Education, 1(1), 65-77.
9. Goodland, R. (1996). Growth has reached its limits. In J. Mander & E. Goldsmith (Eds.)
The case against the global economy: And for a turn toward the global (207-217). San
Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
10. Kates, R. W. (2000). Population and consumption. Environment, 42(3), 10-19.
11. Linden, E. (1997). A world awakens. Time, 80-81.
12. MacNeill, J., Winsemius, P., & Yakushiji, T. (1991). Beyond interdependence: The meshing
of the world’s economy and the Earth’s ecology. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
13. McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. New York: Random House.
14. Özdemir O., Yıldız, A., Ocaktan, E. & Sarışen, Ö. (2004). Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin
çevre sorunları konusundaki farkındalık ve duyarlılıkları. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Mecmuası, 57(3), 117-127.
15. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual.McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire, England.
16. Redclift, M. (1984). Development and the environmental crisis: Red or green alternatives.
London: Methuen.
17. Şimşekli, Y., 2004. Çevre bilincinin geliştirilmesine yönelik çevre eğitimi etkinliklerine
ilköğretim okullarının duyarlılığı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 83-
92.
18. UNESCO. (1977). Tbilisi Declaration. Paper presented at the Intergovernmental Conference
on Environmental Education Tbilisi, USSR.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com