You are here

Home » Content

EĞİTİMİN FELSEFİK TEMELLERİ VE TÜRK POLİS TEŞKİLATINDA EĞİTİM VE ÖĞRETİMİN İNCELENMESİ

PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATION AND A REVIEW OF POLICE EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN TURKEY

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this article is to examine the philosophical foundations of education and apply it to the police education and training in Turkey. In this article, first, the assumptions of two major philosophies of education: idealism and realism are reviewed. Four elements of education: the aims of education, the role of the instructor, curriculum, and the status of student are discussed. Next, the structure of police education and police educational institutions are critiqued. Finally, the author offers a research question and suggests a scientific research with regard to how to improve the quality of police education and identify the aims and the needs for a better police education and training in Turkey?
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalenin amacı, eğitim ve öğretimin felsefi temellerini inceleyerek, Türk Polis Teşkilatına uygulamaktır. Bu amaçla, ilk olarak idealizm ve realizm felsefelerinin eğitim ve öğretim ile ilgili varsayımları tartışılmaktadır. Eğitimin dört bileşeni: eğitimin amaçları, öğretmenin rolü, müfredat ve öğrencinin konumu, bu bölümde detaylı olarak incelendikten sonra, Türk polisinin eğitimi, eğitim ve öğretim kurumlarının yapısı tartışılmaktadır. Son olarak, Türk Polisinin temel eğitim ve öğretiminin kalitesinin artırılabilmesi için yapılması gerekenlere dair bazı tespit ve önerilerde bulunulmaktadır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-egitimin-felsefik-temelleri-turk-polis-teskilatinda-egitim-ogretimin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
83-96
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Haberfeld, M. R. (2002). Critical Issues in Police Training. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merril Prentice Hall.
3. Kant, I. (1781). “The Critique of Pure Reason”. Retrieved on 07/24/2009 from http://
etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16p/.
4. Ozmon, A. H., & Craver, M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Education (7th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. 5. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The Courage to Teach: Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s
Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Schafersman, S. D. (1994). An Introduction to Science: Scientific Thinking and the Scientific
Method. Retrieved on 10/07/2007 from http://scholar.google.com.ez.lib.jjay.cuny.
edu/scholar?hl=en&lr=&sa=G&oi=qs&q=steven+d+schafersman+author:s-schafersman
7. Shadish, W. R., Campbell, D. T., & Cook, T. D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi- experimental
Designs for generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
8. Sherman, W. L. (1978). The quality of police education: a critical review with recommendations
for improving programs in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Sherman, W. L. (1982). Learning police ethics. Criminal Justice Ethics. Vol.1, No.1, pp.
10-19.
10. Souryal, S. S. (2007). Ethics in criminal justice: In search of the truth (4th ed.). Cincinnati,
OH: Anderson Publication.
11. Yurdaer, A. (2000). Evaluating the police field training program in Turkey (Polis Akademisinde
verilen uygulamalı eğitimin değerlendirilmesi), Turkish Journal of Police Studies,
Vol. 2, No. 7-8, pp.209-232.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com