You are here

Home » Content

Derse İlgi Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

The Validity and Relıability Of Turkish Version Of The Student Interest Scale

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the present study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Student Interest Scale (Mazer, 2013b). Participants were 258 undergraduate students. The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that the original structure of the Student Interest Scale consisting 16 items and 2 factors was replicated. Two factors accounted for the 59% of the total variance. Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the sixteen items loaded on two factors (emotional and cognitive; x²= 245.88, df= 99, RMSEA= .076, NFI= .90, NNFI= .92, CFI= .94, IFI= .94, SRMR= .056). The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .56 to .78. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were .90 for emotional interest subscale, .89 for cognitive interest subscale. These results demonstrate that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı Derse İlgi Ölçeği’ni (Mazer, 2013b) Türkçeye uyarlayarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 258 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde bütün maddelerin iki alt boyut altında toplandığı ve toplam varyansın %59’unu açıklayan bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde 16 maddeden ve iki alt boyuttan (bilişsel ve duyuşsal) oluşan modelin iyi uyum verdiği görülmüştür (x²= 245.88, sd= 99, RMSEA= .076, NFI= .90, NNFI= .92, CFI= .94, IFI= .94, SRMR= .056). Ölçeğin düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyon katsayıları ise .56 ile .78 arasında sıralanmaktadır. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayıları duyuşsal ilgi alt boyutu için .90, bilişsel ilgi alt boyutu için .89 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 226-3636-3-pb.pdf
  • 4
1471
1480
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Acar, B., & Yaman, M. (2011). Bağlam temelli öğrenmenin öğrencilerin ilgi ve bilgi düzeylerine
etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 1-10.
Boekaerts, M., & Boscolo, P. (2002). Interest in learning, learning to be interested. Learning and
Instruction, 12, 375-382.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (11. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi
Yayınları.
Byrne, B., M., & Campbell, T., L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent
measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 30, 555-574.
Çetin, B. (2008). Türkçe, sosyal bilgiler ve sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin coğrafya derslerine
olan ilgi düzeyi. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 13(19), 33-48.
Harp, S., F., & Mayer, R., E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations:
On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 89, 92-102.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69-82.
Hu, L., T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Joreskog, K., G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific
Software International.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations
from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409.
Krapp, A. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal
for Vocational and Educational Guidance, 7, 5-21.
Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings.
International Journal of Science Education, 33, 27-50.
Kuzgun, Y. (2006). İlköğretimde rehberlik (6. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Lin, S., H., Hong, R. Z., & Chen, C. Y. (2013). Exploring the development of college students’ situational
interest in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2152-2173.
Mazer, J., P. (2013a). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and
engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62, 86-96.
Mazer, J., P. (2013b). Validity of the Student Interest and Engagement Scales: Associations with
student learning outcomes. Communication Studies, 64, 125-140.
Mazer, J., P. (2013c). Student emotional and cognitive interest as mediators of teacher communication
behaviors and student engagement: An examination of direct and interaction effects.
Communication Education, 62, 253-277.
Mazer, J., P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales.
Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99-125.
Palmer, H., D. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 46, 147-165.
Renninger, K., A., Ewen, L., & Lasher, A. K. (2002). Individual interest as context in expository text
and mathematical word problems. Learning and Instruction, 12, 467-491.
Riconscente, M., M. (2014). Effects of perceived teacher practices on Latino high school students’ interest,
self-efficacy, and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 51-73.
Derse İlgi Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik... 1479
K. Ü. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 23 (4)
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom.
Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
Sipahi, B., & Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul:
Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
Sünbül, M., A. (2011). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
Tabachnick, B., G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins
College Publishers.
Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest
during a science learning task. Instructional Science, 41, 1047-1064.
Tela, A., Tela, A., & Adeniyi, O. (2009). Locus of control, interest in schooling, self-efficacy and
academic achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 168-182.
Weber, K., Martin, M., & Patterson, B. (2010). Teacher behavior, student interest and affective
learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 71-90.
Yaman, M., Dervişoğlu, S., & Soran, H. (2004). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin derslere ilgilerinin belirlenmesi.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 232-240.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com