You are here

Home » Content

Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışları Ölçeği: Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

Developing a Scale to Measure Knowledge Sharing Behaviours

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
It is vital to understand why people participate in knowledge sharing processes in virtual community of practices (VCoPs) to encourage knowledge sharing behaviours (KBSs) of community members. Till now, no effort has been put into developing a valid and reliable measure of KSB in Turkish culture. The primary purpose of this study is to develop a new measure of KSB. We used a combination of literature review and semi-structured interviews with 19 community members to develop an item pool. Qualitative analysis of the interview data showed that factors affecting KSB are twofold: contextual and personal factors. The validity and reliability studies of the scale were conducted on 300 members of VCoPs. The KSB scale developed in this study is a five-dimensional, twenty-one-item, five-response choice frequency scale. The scale includes “enjoy helping”, “respect”, “usefulness/relevancy”, “trust” and “altruism” dimensions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sanal uygulama topluluklarında bireylerin bilgi paylaşma süreçlerine neden katıldıklarının anlaşılması topluluk üyelerinin bilgi paylaşma davranışlarının desteklenmesi ve teşvik edilmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Ülkemizdeki çalışmalar incelendiğinde kültürümüze uygun sanal uygulama topluluğu üyelerinin bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını etkileyen faktörleri ölçmeye yönelik geçerli ve güvenilir bir araca rastlanılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada sanal uygulama topluluğu üyelerinin bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek amacıyla bir ölçme aracının geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Madde havuzunun hazırlanmasında alanyazından ve çalışma grubunu oluşturan topluluklara üye 19 üye ile yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden yararlanılmıştır. Görüşme kayıtları içerik analizi ile çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını etkileyen etmenlerin bağlamsal ve kişisel faktörler altında toplandığını göstermiştir. Ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çözümlemeleri çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 300 üyeden elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, 5’li likert tipinde ve 21 maddeden oluşan ölçeğin; “Yardım etmekten mutlu olmak”, “Saygı”, “Yararlılık/Uygunluk”, “Güven” ve “Fedakarlık” olarak adlandırılan toplam beş boyutlu bir yapıdan oluştuğu ortaya çıkmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-bilgi-paylasma-davranislari-olcegi-olcek-gelistirme-calismasi.pdf
  • 3
1033
1054
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akkoyunlu, B., Orhan, F. ve Umay, A. (2005). Bilgisayar Öğretmenleri İçin “Bilgisayar Öğretmenliği
Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği” Geliştirme Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 1-8.
Alam, S. S., Abdullah, Z., Ishak, N. A. & Zain, Z. M. (2009). Assessing knowledge sharing behaviour
among employees in SMEs: An empirical study. International Business Research, 2(2), 115-22.
Amerikan Verimlilik ve Kalite Merkezi (American Productivity & Quality Center), (2000). Building
and Sustaining Communities of Practice: Continuing in Knowledge Management. Houston:
American Productivity & Quality Center.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood
Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baran, B. (2007). A Case Study of Online Communities of Practice for Teacher Education: Motivators,
Barriers and Outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Chang, H. H. & Chuang, S.-S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge
sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9-18.
Chen, I. Y. L., Chen, N.-S. & Kinshuk. (2009). Examining the Factors Influencing Participants’ Knowledge
Sharing Behavior in Virtual Learning Communities. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 134-148.
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H. & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding Knowledge Sharing In Virtual
Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support
Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik
SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998).Working knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know.
Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A. & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a Typology of Virtual Communities of Practice.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1, 69-93.
Erhardt, N. (2003). Enablers and barriers for individuals’willingness and ability to share knowledge:
an exploratory study. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University.
Fang, Y.-H. & Chiu, C.-M. (2010). In justice we trust: Exploring knowledge-sharing continuance
intentions in virtual communities of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 235-246.
Gross, N. & Kluge, A. (2012). “Why should I share what I know?” -Antecedents for enhancing
knowledge-sharing behavior and its impact on shared mental models in steel production. Proceedings
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 403-407.
Holsapple, C. W. & Joshi, K. D. (2002). Knowledge Management: A Threefold Framework. Information
Society, 18(1), 47-64.
Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H. & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual
communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153-169.
1052 Turgay ALAKURT , Hafize KESER...
Mayıs 2016 Cilt:24 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Hung, S.-Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H.-M. & Lin, W.-M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-
Computer Studies, 69(6), 415-427.
Johnson, C. (2001). A Survey of Current Research on Online Communities of Practice. The Internet
and Higher Education, 4(1), 45-60.
Kalaycı, Ş. (Editör). (2006). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. (İkinci Baskı).
Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge
Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143. doi: citeulike-
article-id:3480809
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. USA: SAGE Publications.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H. S., & Hong, S. A. (2014). Factors Affecting Hospital Employees’ Knowledge Sharing
Intention and Behavior, and Innovation Behavior. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives,
5(3), 148–155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2014.04.006
Lee, J. (2001). The impact of knowledgesharing, organizational capability and partnership quality
on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 38(5), 323—335.
Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. ve Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and
Interpretation. (Second Edition). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lin, C.-A. & Chen, M.-C. (2009). Factors affecting teachers’ knowledge sharing behaviours and
motivation: system that work. eLAC.
Lin, M.-J. J., Hung, S.-W. & Chen, C.-J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing
in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 929-939.
Ma, W. W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online
attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human
Behavior, 39, 51-58.
Perik, H.T.M. (2014) Research into factors that influence the intention to share knowledge on a
knowledge community platform within youth care: the case of “Jeugdkwartier”.
Stanoevska-Slabeva, K. & Schmid, B. F. (2001). A Typology of Online Communities and Community
Supporting Platforms. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences.
Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. (İkinci Baskı). Ankara: Nobel
Yayınları. No 399.
Yi, J. (2005). A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: Scale development and validation. Unpublished
3204302, Indiana University, United States -- Indiana.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (5. Basım). Ankara:
Seçkin Yayınları.
Yu, T.-K., Lu, L.-C. & Liu, T.-F. (2010). Exploring Factors That Influence Knowledge Sharing
Behavior via Weblogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 32-41.
Wang, S. & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research.
Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in
electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 155-173.
Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışları Ölçeği: Ölçek Geliştirme... 1053
May 2016 Vol:24 No:3 Kastamonu Education Journal
Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge
contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35-57.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to
managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com