Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Problem Çözme Durumlarındaki Motivasyonel Öngörüleri

Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis.
New York: New York University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Cleary, T., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts,
non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 61–82.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students:
A social cognitive perspective, Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 45-63.
Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2002). The importance of challenging tasks for mathematically
gifted students. Gifted and Talented International, 17(2), 76-84.
Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2006). The relationship between cognitive abilities and self regulated learning:
evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gende. rHigh Ability Studies, 16(2), 201-218.
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the
learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming Gifts into Talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Theory. In: N. Colangelo
& G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 60-74). Bostno MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Garofalo, J. (1993). Mathematical problem preferences of meaning-oriented and number-oriented
problem solvers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 26-40.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative
research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Greene, J. A., Moos D. C., Azevedo R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between
gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia.
Computers & Education, 50, 1069–1083
Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1994). Evidence of extreme mathematical precocity:
Case studies of talented youths. Roeper Review, 16(3), 144-151.
Malpass, J. R., O’neil, H. F., & Hocevar JR., D. (1999). Self-regulation, goal orientation, selfefficacy,
worry, and high-stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students.
Roeper Review, 21(4), 281-288.
Miller, R. C. (1990). Discovering mathematical talent. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children,
ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No: ED 321 487.
Neber, H. & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002) Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students:
The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High
Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research,
66(4), 543–578.
Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning.
International Journal of Educational Research, 31,459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich,
& M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 451-501) .San Diego, CA:A cademic Press.
Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Problem... 1177
May 2016 Vol:24 No:3 Kastamonu Education Journal
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of
classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Ruban, L., & Reis, S.M. (2006). Patterns of self-regulatory strategy use among low-achieving and
high-achieving university students. Roeper Review, 28(3), (148-156).
Senko, C., Hulleman, C.S. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011) Achievement goal theory at the crossroads:
Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions, Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47.
Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208-223.
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.). (1994). Self- regulation of learning and performance:
Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis.
Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
Yetkin, İ. E. (2006). The role of classroom context in student self-regulated learning: an exploratory case study
in a sixth-grade mathematics classroom. DoktoraT ezi. UMI Number: 3217420, Ohio State University.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde NiteAl raştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Designs and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.
Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview
and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk, (Eds.) Self- regulated learning and academic achievement:
Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological
developments, and future prospects, American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.