You are here

Teoriden Uygulamaya Geçiş: Okul Deneyimi Sürecindeki Matematik İle Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Karşılaştırılması

Transition From Theory To Practice: A Comparison Of Math and Computer Education And Instructional Technology Teachers During School Experience

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to understand the experiences faced during school experience period of either prospective Math or Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) teachers. Highlighting the differences and similarities between prospective Math and CEIT teachers is also one of the purposes. Data were collected from 11 participants. The findings suggested that selection of mentors and practice schools have great importance as well as the true guidance of the university supervisor. Most of the participants agreed on the inadequacies of the connection between what is taught in campus and what happens in schools. In general, both groups of prospective teachers showed similar approaches, but prospective CEIT teachers were more concerned about technological infrastructural problems.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, Matematik ile Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri (BT) öğretmen adaylarının okul deneyimi sürecindeki tecrübelerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın odaklarından birisi, Matematik ve BT öğretmen adayları arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıkları ortaya koymaktır. Veriler 11 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, mentor ve uygulama okulu seçimlerinin, üniversitelerdeki danışmanların rehberliği kadar önemli olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Katılımcıların çoğu, üniversitedeki öğretilenlerle okullarda uygulananlar arasındaki ilişkilendirmenin yetersiz olduğunu düşünmektedir. Genel olarak, her iki bölümün öğretmen adaylarının benzer düşünceler sergilediği ancak BT öğretmen adaylarının daha çok okullardaki teknik altyapının yetersizliği ile ilgili endişelere sahip olduğu görülmüştür.
1517
1532

REFERENCES

References: 

Bates A. J., Ramirez, L., & Drits, D. (2009).Connectıng unıversıty supervision and critical reflection:
mentoring and modeling. The Teacher Educator, 44, 90–112,
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a good practicum placement: student teacher perceptions,
Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81–98.
Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and
student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
Carter, K., & Anders, D. (1996). Program pedagogy. The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a
knowledge base for the preparation of teachers, 557-592.
Cochran, K. F. (1993). Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation.
Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
Coşkun, A., & Daloğlu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English Language Teacher Education Program
through Peacock’s Model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24-42.
Cothran D. J., Kulinna, P. H., & Garrahy D. A. (2003). ‘‘This is kind of giving a secret away...’’: students’
perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education 19. 435–444.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher
Education, 57(3), 300-314.
De Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In: A. J. Bishop, K. Clements,
C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education
(pp. 49–97). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadık, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and
technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423-435.
Everhart, B., & Turner, E. (1996). Preservice clinical experiences. The Journal of Physical Education,
Recreation, & Dance, 67(4), 62-65.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice. Designing a continuum to strengten and
sustain teaching. Teachers’ College Record, 103, 1013-1055.
Fırat, H.B., & Yaratan, H. (2013). Impact of external examinations on high school curricula: Perceptions of
teachers and students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53(A), 1-18.
1530 Rezan YILMAZ, Emine ŞENDURUR, Polat ŞENDURUR...
Mayıs 2016 Cilt:24 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Friedman, B., & Khan, P.H. (1994). Educating computer scientists: linking the social and the technical.
Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 65-70.
Frykholm, J. A. (1999). The impact of reform: Challenges for mathematics teacher preparation.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 79-105
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P.R. (1992). Critical thinking and its relationship to motivation, learning
strategies, and classroom experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August.
Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics
Teacher Education, 11, 199–219.
Goodland, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational
Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia Pacific Journal
of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing
World. What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to Do. In L. Darling-Hammond and J.
Bransford (Eds), How Teachers Learn and Develop (pp. 258-389), Jossey-Bass: Wiley.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Hoffmann, A. J., & Seah, W. T. (2003). Understanding mathematics learning
and teaching through beliefs, values and norms. In 81st Annual Meeting of the National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Research Presession), April, San Antonio, TX.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82.
Howey, K., & Zimpher, N. (2006). (Eds.). Boundary Spanners. Washington, DC: American Association
of State Colleges and Universities.
Iancu-Haddad D., & Oplatka, I. (2009). Mentoring novice teachers: Motives, process and outcomes
from the mentor’s point of view. The New Educator, 5, 45-65.
Jackson, P. W. (1974). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
James C. MC, Virginia P. R., & Vicki E. B (2006). The Relationships of Student End-of-Class Motivation
with Teacher Communication Behaviors and Instructional Outcomes, Communication
Education, 55(4), 403-414.
Kelecioglu, H. (2002). Ortaöğretim Başarı Puanlarının Üniversiteye Girişte İki Aşamalı Sınavda
Uygulanan ÖYS, ÖSS ve Tek Aşamalı Sınavda Uygulanan ÖSS İle İlişkileri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 135–144.
Kennedy, M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes
(Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 54-85). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher
education. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 4-17.
Kuyper, H., van der Werf, M.P.C., & Lubbers, M.J. (2000). Motivation, meta-cognition and
self-regulation as predictors of long term educational attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation,
6(3), 181–201.
Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610.
Leshem, S. (2012). The Many Faces of Mentor-Mentee Relationships in a Pre-Service Teacher
Education Programme. Creative Education, 3(4), 413-421.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
Transition From Theory To Practice: A Comparison... 1531
May 2016 Vol:24 No:3 Kastamonu Education Journal
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, J. (2007). Improving relationships between mentor teachers and student teachers: Engaging
in a pedagogy of explicitness. The New Educator, 3, 75-94.
McCormack, A. (1997). Classroom management problems, strategies, and influences in physical
education. European Physical Education Review, 3, 102–115.
McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field laboratory experiences. In J. P. Sikula,
T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.). New
York: Macmillan Library Reference
Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of mathematics anxiety and its influence
on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60-70.
Moyer P. S. & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learnıng to questıon: categorıes of questıonıng used by preservıce
teachers durıng dıagnostıc mathematıcs intervıews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher
Education 5, 293–315.
Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H.B., & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and interactive
board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of FATİH project.
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-
Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
Educational Pyschologist 37(2), 91-106.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational
beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review
of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Retallick, M. S., & Miller, G. (2010). Teacher Preparation in Career and Technical Education: A
Model for Developing and Researching Early Field Experiences. Journal of Career and Technical
Education, 25(1), 62-75.
Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication
Education, 39, 181-195.
Schulz, R. (2005). The practicum: More than practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1&2),
147–167.
Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: The pedagogy of content/the content
of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 489–504.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher
,15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational
Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Simpson, A. W., & Erickson, M. T. (1983). Teachers’ Verbal and Nonverbal Communication Patterns
as a Function of Teacher Race, Student Gender, and Student Race. American Educational
Research Journal. 20(2), 183-198.
Smith, K. & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education. The
voice of the students. Asia Pasific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 289-302.
Steen, L. A., & Forman, S. L. (1995). Mathematics for work and life. In I. M. Carl (Ed.), Prospectus
for school mathematics (pp. 219–241). Reston: NCTM.
Valencia, S., Martin, S., Place, N., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching:
Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304-322.
1532 Rezan YILMAZ, Emine ŞENDURUR, Polat ŞENDURUR...
Mayıs 2016 Cilt:24 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Vertuno, E. M. (1995). Placing students in field experiences. In G. A. Slick (Ed.), Preparing new
teachers: Operating successful field experience programs (pp. 29-37). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin Press.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Youens, B., & Bailey, M. (2004). The impact of quality assurance on mentor training in initial teacher
education partnerships: a UK perspective, Canadian Journal of Educational Administration
and Policy, 32(1), 1–24.
Zeichner, K. (1996) Designing educative practicum experiences for prospective teachers, in: K.
Zeichner, S. Melnick & M. L. Gomez (Eds) Currents of reform in preservice teacher education,
New York: Teachers College Press.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in
college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com