You are here

Home » Content

ABD’deki Kadın Okul Bölgesi Müdürlerinin Yaşadığı Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığına Dayalı Sorunlar, Üstesinden Gelme Yolları ve Öneriler

Gender Discrimination Based Problems Faced By Female Superintendents in ahe USA, Overcome and Recommendations

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The research aims to identify gender based discrimination issues faced by female superintendents in the USA, causes, ways to overcome and their recommendations. This qualitative research is based on the opinion of 15 female superintendents. It was concluded that the majority of female superintendents experience gender discrimination. The problems are while mans to be preferred as a manager, women don’t be preferred; the belief that women cannot do management; don’t accept of women’s decision. Discrimination caused by social norms, social culture. Overcome to problems are to be focused aim; working hard to prove herself; establish good relationship; to learn not to be angry and disappointed; moving based on the data and self-reliance. The recommendations are do good works, neglect discrimination and to be positive.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Araştırmanın amacı, ABD’deki okul bölgesi müdürlerinin cinsiyet ayrımcılığına dayalı yaşadıkları sorunları, nedenlerini, üstesinden gelme yollarını ve önerilerini belirlemektir. Araştırma 15 kadın okul bölgesi müdürünün görüşlerine dayanan nitel araştırmadır. Verilerin analizinde içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, kadın müdürlerin çoğunluğunun cinsiyet ayrımcılığı yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Yaşanan sorunlar erkeklerin müdür olarak tercih edilirken kadınların edilmemesi; kadınların yöneticilik yapamayacağına inanılması ve kadınların kararlarının kabul edilmemesidir. Ayrımcılığın nedenleri toplumsal normlar, toplumsal kültürdür. Sorunların üstesinden gelme yolları hedefe odaklanmak; çok çalışarak kendini kanıtlamak; iyi ilişkiler kurmak; kızmamayı ve hayal kırıklığına uğramamayı öğrenmek; veriye dayalı hareket etmek ve kendine güvenmektir. Önerileri ise işleri iyi yapmaları, ayrımcılıkları önemsememeleri ve olumlu olmalarıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-abddeki-kadin-okul-bolgesi-mudurlerinin-yasadigi-cinsiyet-ayrimciligina-dayali-sorunlar-ustesinden-gelme-yollari-oneriler.pdf
  • 1
401
418
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Babaoğlan, E. (2011). Birkaç kadın denetçiden biri olmanın zorlukları. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 44(4), 121-144.
Bell, C. S. (1988). Organizational influences on women’s experience in the superintendency. Peabody
Journal of Education, 65(4), 31-59.
Besler, S. ve Oruç, İ. (2010). Türkiye’de ve yazılı basında kadın yöneticiler. Anadolu Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 17–38.
Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
Billing, Y. D. (2011). Are women in management victims of the phantom of the male norm? Gender
Work & Organization, 18(3), 298-317.
Björk, L. G. (2000). Introduction: Women in the superintendency-advances in research and theory.
Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 5-17.
Brunner, C. C. & Kim, Y. L. (2010). Are women prepared to be school superintendents? an essay on
the myths and misunderstandings. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(8), 276-309.
Brunner, C. C. (2008). Invisible, limited, and emerging discourse: research practices that restrict
and/or increase access for women and persons of color to the superintendency. Journal of School
Leadership, 18(6), 661-682.
Brunner, C. C. (2000). Unsettled moments in settled discourse: women superintendents experiences
of inequality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 76-116.
Brunner, C. C. (1998). Women superintendents: strategies for success. The Journal of Educational
Administration, 36(2), 160-182.
Brunner, C. C. (1996). Developing women leaders: The art of “stalking” the superintendency. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators. San
Diego, CA, March 8-11.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. London and New
York: Routledge Falmer, Taylor & Francis Group.
416 Emine BABAOĞLAN...
Ocak 2017 Cilt:25 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: Thousand
Oaks, Sage Publications.
Crowson, R. L. & Glass, T. E. (1991). The changing role of the local school district superintendent
in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Chicago, April 3-7.
Dobie, D. F. & Hummel, B. (2001). Successful women superintendents in a gender-biased profession.
Equity & Excellence in Education, 34(2), 22-28.
Gray, P. S., Williamson, J. B., Karp, D. A. & Dalphin, J. R. (2007). The research imagination: An
introduction to qualitative and quantitative methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grogan, M. (2008). The short tenure of a woman superintendent: A clash of gender and politics.
Journal of School Leadership, 18(6), 634-660.
Grogan, M. (1994, Nisan). Aspiring to the superintendency in the public school systems: Women’s
perpectives. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the AERA. New Orleans, LA.
Holland, E. (2011). Gender gap is narrowing in ranks of schools chiefs. (2014, Aralık 22).
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd Edition, Sage Publication, London.
Miller, C. M. (2009). Overcoming barriers: Women in the superintendency, Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Georgia State University.
NCES (2011). National center for educational statistics. (2014, Aralık 15).
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd Edition, Sage Publication, London.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation, program evaluation kit. California:
Sage Publications.
Rubin, H. J. ve Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. California:
Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication.
Schmuck, P. A. (1975). Deterrents to women’s careers in school management. Sex Roles, 1(4), 339-353.
Skrla, L. (2000). The social construction of gender in the superintendency. Journal of Education
Policy, 15(3), 293-316.
Skrla, L., Reyes, P. & Scheurich, J. J. (2000). Sexism, silence, and solutions: Women superintendents
speak up and speak out. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 44-75.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 25(4), 324-337.
Tallerico, M. (2000). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender, and color. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 18-43.
Tallerico, M. & Blount, J. M. (2004). Women and the superintendency: Insights from theory and
history. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 633-662.
Usluer, L. (2000). Kadın öğretmenlerin yönetici konumlara yükseltilmeme nedenleri konusundaki
öğretmen ve yönetici görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara
Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com