You are here

Öğretmenlik Mesleğinin Bir Kadın Mesleğine Dönüşmesi Sorunsalı

The Problematic of Transition of Teaching Profession to a Woman’s Occupation1

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to evaluate preservice teachers who prefer teaching profession in terms of their genders. For this purpose, the number of preservice teachers studying in education faculties between 1997-2016 (in total) and studying in “primary school, social studies, mathematics and pre-school teacher education” in the same years is investigated in terms of their genders and female and male ratios. In the research, descriptive study model is used. Within the scope of research, the data are obtained from the SSPC statistics published by CHE in electronic environment. According to the findings, it is found that the number of female preservice teachers attending education faculties be-tween 1997-2016 increased more than males and these findings are similar in primary school, social studies, mathematics and pre-school preservice teachers. Especially, female preservice teachers in pre-school education constitute a large majority. In the social studies teacher department, unlike other programs, it is understood that the numbers of male preservice teacher is higher than females. The results of the research show that the teaching profession has a tendency to become more and more women's profession.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada öğretmenlik mesleğini tercih eden öğretmen adaylarının, cinsiyetleri açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla 1997-2016 yılları arasında eğitim fakültelerinde öğrenim gören öğretmen adayları (toplam) ile aynı yıllar arasında “Sınıf, fen bilgisi, sosyal bilgiler, matematik ve okul öncesi öğretmenliğinde” öğrenim gören öğretmen adayları, cinsiyete gore sayıları ile kadın ve erkek öğretmen adayı oranları açısından incelenmiştir. Araştırmada tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında veriler YOK’ün yayınladığı OSYM istatistiklerinden, el-ektronik ortamda elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre 1997-2016 yılları arasında eğitim fakültelerine devam eden kadın öğretmen adayı sayılarının erkek öğretmen adayı sayılarına göre daha fazla artış gösterdiği, bu durumun sınıf, fen bilgisi, matematik, okul öncesi öğretmenliğinde de ben-zer olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Özellikle okul öncesi öğretmenliğinde kadın öğretmen adayları, büyük bir çoğunluğu oluşturmaktadırlar. Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliğinde ise diğer programlardan farklı olarak erkek öğretmen adaylarının sayılarının kadın adaylardan daha fazla olduğu an-laşılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, öğretmenlik mesleğinin giderek daha fazla kadın mesleğine dönüşme eğilimi içerisinde olduğunu göstermektedir.
415
450

REFERENCES

References: 

Aksu, M., Demir, C. E., Daloglu, A., Yildirim, S. & Kiraz, E. (2010). Who are the future teachers in Turkey? Characteristics of entering stu-dent teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 91-101.
Anliak, S. (2004). Okuloncesi donemde cocugun yasaminda baba ve erkek ogretmenin rolu ve onemi (The importance of father and male te-acher in child’s life in the period of preschool). Ege Egitim Dergisi (Journal of Ege Education), 5, 25-33.
Arabaci, I. B. (1999). MEB teftis politikalari (1) (MONE inspection policies (1). Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi Dergisi (Educational Ad-
The Problematic of Transition of Teaching Profession to a Woman’s Occupation
445  OPUS ©Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
ministration: Theory and Practice), 20, 545-575. Accessed: 09 Septem-ber 2013 http://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/924- 20120221154628-arabaci.pdf
Ayan, F. (2000). Bayan ogretmenlerin yoneticilikleri ve ogretmen gorusleri (Fe-male teachers performance in administration and teachers perceptions). (Unpublished master dissertation). Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Uni-versity, Canakkale.
Bastick, T. (2000). Why teacher trainees choose the teaching profession? Comparing trainees in metropolitan and developing countries. In-ternational Review of Education, 46(3/4), 343-349.
Behymer, J. & Cockriel, I. W. (1988). Career choice conflict. Journal of Career Development, 15(2), 134-140. Benedict, P. (2000). Feminization of education. Paper presented at the Changing Nature of Teaching in Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Birey, T. & Beyidoglu Onen, M. (2013). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve ogretmenlik: Ogretmenlerin bakis acisi (Gender and teaching profession: perspectives of teachers). Post Arastirma Enstitusu (Post Research Institute).
Boyle, E. (2004). The feminization of teaching in America. Massachusetts Ins-titute of Technology. Accessed: 15 March 2016 http://web.mit.edu/womens-studies/www/wri-tingPrize/eb04.html.
Boz, Y. & Boz, N. (2008). Kimya ve matematik ogretmen adaylarinin og-retmen olma nedenleri (Prospective chemistry and mathematics teachers’ reasons for choosing teaching as a profession). Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi (Journal of Kastamonu Education), 16(1), 137-144.
Buyukkaragoz, S. S. & Civi, C. (1999). Genel ogretim metotlari, ogretimde planlama uygulama (10.Vol). Istanbul: Beta Press.
Capri, B. & Celikkaleli, O. (2008). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretmenlige iliskin tutum ve mesleki yeterlik inanclarinin cinsiyet, program ve fakultelerine gore incelenmesi (Investigation of preservice teach-ers’ attitudes towards teaching and professional self-efficacy be-liefs according to their gender, programs, and faculties). Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(15), 33-53.
Celikten, M., Sanal, M. & Yeni, Y. (2005). Ogretmenlik meslegi ve ozellik-leri. Erciyes Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 19(2), 207-237.
Aysun Erginer – Emine Saklan
OPUS ©Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi  446
Cermik, H., Dogan, B. & Sahin, A. (2010). Sinif ogretmenligi ogretmen adaylarinin ogretmenlik meslegini tercih sebepleri (Prospective elementary classroom teachers’ motives for selecting teaching pro-fession). Journal of Pamukkale Education Faculty, 28(2), 201-212.
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. & Turner, L.A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. (M. Sever, Translation.). Arastirma yontemleri desen ve analiz (Research design and analysis methods). Ankara: Ani Publishing.
Coultas, J. C. & Lewin, K. M. (2002). Who becomes a teacher? The charac-teristics of student teachers in four countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 243-60.
Erden, M. (1998). Ogretmenlik meslegine giris (Introduction to teaching profes-sion). Istanbul: Alkim Publishing.
Eskicumali, A. (2002). Egitim, ogretim ve ogretmenlik meslegi (Education, training, and the teaching profession). Y. Ozden (Ed.). Ogretmenlik meslegine giris (Introduction to teaching profession). Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
Foster, T. & Newman, E. (2005). Just a knock back? Identity bruising on their route to becoming a male primary school teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 341-358.
Fuhr, C. (1996). Deutsches bildungswesen (System of germany education). Koln: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung & Compagnie Kom-manditgesellschaft.
Glewwe, P. W., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D. & Ravina, R. (2013). School resources and educational outcomes in developing count-ries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. P. Glewwe (Ed.), Education policy in developing countries (pp. 13-64). University of Chicago Press.
Gokce, F. & Sezer, G. O. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretmenlik mes-legine yonelik tutumlari (Uludag universitesi ornegi) (The atti-tudes of student teachers towards teaching profession: Uludag university sample). Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Edu-cation, 25(1), 1-23.
The Problematic of Transition of Teaching Profession to a Woman’s Occupation
447  OPUS ©Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
Ilter, I., & Koksalan, B. (2011). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin ogretmenlik meslegine olan tutumları (Attitudes of classroom teacher candida-tes toward teaching profession). Firat Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Fırat University Journal of Social Science), 21 (1), 113-128.
Ismen, A. E. & Yildiz, S. A. (2005). Ogretmenlige iliskin tutumlarin oz-gecilik ve atilganlik duzeyleri acisindan incelenmesi (The relation-ship between altruism, assertiveness and attitudes towards teach-ing profession). Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi Dergisi (Ed-ucational Administration: Theory and Practice), 42, 151–166.
Johnston, J., McKeown, E. & McEwen, A. (1999). Choosing primary teac-hing as a career: The perspectives of male sand females in training. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(1), 55-64.
Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel arastirma yontemi (Scientific research methods). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Kaya, A. & Buyukkasap, E. (2005). Fizik ogretmenligi programi ogrencile-rinin profilleri, ogretmenlik meslegine yonelik tutum ve endise-leri: Erzurum ornegi (Physısc student teachers’ profıles, attitudes and anxiety toward teaching profession: Case for Erzurum). Kas-tamonu Egitim Dergisi (Journal of Kastamonu Education), 13(2). 367-380.
Kniveton, B. H. (2004). The influences and motivations on which students base their choice of career. Research in Education, 72, 47-57.
Koroglu, F. (2006). Okul yonetiminde cinsiyet etkeni ve kadin ogretmenlerin okul yoneticiligi talepleri (Bingol ili ornegi) (The factor of sex in the school administration and the women’s tendency to administration) (Un-published master dissertation). Firat University, Elazig.
Kyriacou, C. & Coulthard, M. (2000). Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career choice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 117-126.
OECD. (2015). Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Pub-lishing.
Oktay, A. (1991). Ogretmenlik meslegi ve ogretmenin nitelikleri (Teaching profession and teacher qualities). M.U. Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egi-tim Bilimleri Dergisi (M. U. Ataturk Faculty Of Education Journal of Educational Science), 3, 187-193.
Aysun Erginer – Emine Saklan
OPUS ©Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi  448
Ovet, O. (2006). Egitim fakultesi ogrencilerinin ogretmenlik meslegini tercih et-melerinde etkili olan faktorlerin belirlenmesi (Unpublished master dis-sertation). Yeditepe University, Istanbul.
Ozbek, R. (2007). Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretmenlik meslegini tercih et-melerinde kisisel, ekonomik ve sosyal faktorlerin etkililik derece-sine iliskin algilari (Teacher candidates’ perceptions about impor-tance of personal, economical and social factors which effect their decissions to be teacher). Firat University Journal of Social Science, 17(1), 145-160.
Ozoglu, M., Gur, B. & Altunoglu, A. (2013). Turkiye ve dunyada ogretmenlik retorik ve pratik. Ankara: Egitim-Bir-Sen Publishing.
Ozsoy, G., Ozsoy, S., Ozkara, Y. & Memis, A. D. (2010). Factors affecting pre-service teachers’ choice of teaching as a profession. Elementary Education Online, 9(3), 910-921.
Papanastasiou, C. & Papanastasiou, E. (1998). What influences students to choose the elementary education major: The case of Cyprus. Medi-terranean Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 35-45.
Parr, M., Gosse, D. & Allison, J. (2008). The profession a journey of male primary teachers: Experiences and perceptions of entering into a sacred female space. The International Journal of Diversity, Organi-zations, Communities and Nations, 7(6), 257-266.
Popkewitz, T. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Saban, A. (2003). A Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teac-hers and their views of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 829-846.
Sahin, A., Cokadar, H. & Usak, M. (2008). Context, process and change: The status of prospective teachers’ perception of teaching process. Essays in Education, 23, 129-141.
Sanders, W. L. & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teac-hers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
Smedley, S. (2007). Learning to be a primary school teacher: reading one man’s story. Gender and Education, 19(3), 369-385.
The Problematic of Transition of Teaching Profession to a Woman’s Occupation
449  OPUS ©Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
Sullivan, P. & McDonough, A. (2002). Teachers differ in their effectiveness. In A. D. Cockburn and E. Nardi (Eds.). Proceedings of the 26th Con-ference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 249-256). Norwich, United Kingdom: School of Edu-cationand Professional Development, University of East Anglia.
Tan, M. (2000). Egitimde kadin-erkek esitligi ve Turkiye gercegi. Kadin-erkek esitligine dogru yuruyus: In Egitim, calisma yasami ve siyaset (pp. 12). İstanbul: Tusiad Publishing.
TEDMEM (Turkish Education Association Publications). (2014). Ogretmen gozuyle ogretmenlik meslegi (The teaching profession for teacher). An-kara: Turkish Education Association.
Temizyurek, F. (2008). Turkce ogretmen adaylarinin demografik ozellik-leri (Demographic characteristics of Turkish teacher candidates). Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi (Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences), 6(4), 663-692.
Torun, F. (2010). Farkli statulerde calisan ogretmenlerin ogretmenlik meslegine bakislari (Isparta ornegi)(Teaching profession views of the teachers who work of different positions (The Isparta sample) (Unpublished master dissertation). Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta.
TUIK. (2015). Toplumsal cinsiyet istatistikleri (Gender statistics) 2014. Ankara: Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu (Turkey Statistical Institute).
Ubuz, B. & Sari, S. (2008). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin ogretmenlik mesle-gini secme nedenleri (Primary teacher candidates’ reasons for cho-osing teaching profession). Pamukkale University Journal of Educa-tion, 24, 113–119.
Varis, F. (1988). Egitimde program gelistirme (Curriculum development). An-kara: Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Yayinlari (Ankara University Educational Sciences Faculty Publications), No: 157.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com