You are here

Home » Content

Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Algılarına Göre Okul Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stilleri İle Örgütsel Sinizm Arasındaki İlişki

The Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of School Managers and Organizational Cynicism According to the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers

Journal Name:

  • OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between leadership styles perceived by teachers of school principals and the organizational cynics. In the research, it has been tried to inves-tigate how much of organizational cynicism can be attributed to leadership styles. The study was conducted according to the relational screening model. The study group selected by the purposeful sampling method consists of a total of 142 teachers working in five secondary schools in Kayseri. The Organizational Cynicism Scale was used to determine organizational cynicism. The Multicultural Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5x-short) was used to determine the leadership styles of school man-agers. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationship between variables, whether the variables influence each other and what the power of explanation is revealed by multiple regression analysis. According to research findings, school principals mostly exhibit transformative leadership behaviours. There is a negative relationship between the transformational leadership dimension and the cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational cynicism. As a result of the regression analysis performed, transformational leader's influence on cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational cynicism is significant.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı okul yöneticilerinin öğretmenler tarafından algılanan liderlik stilleri ile ör-gütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Araştırmada örgütsel sinizmin ne kadarının liderlik stillerine bağlanabileceği irdelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modeline göre yapıl-mıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen ve Kayseri’de bulunan beş ortaokulda çalışan toplam 142 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Örgütsel sinizmi belirleyebilmek için, Ör-gütsel Sinizm Ölçeği, okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerini belirlemek amacıyla Çok Faktörlü Liderlik Anketi (MLQ 5x-short) kullanılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişki için korelasyon katsayıları he-saplanmış, değişkenlerin birbirlerini etkileyip etkilemediğini ve açıklama gücünün ne olduğu ise çoklu regresyon analizi ile ortaya konmuştur. Araştırma bulgularına göre, okul yöneticileri çoğun-lukla dönüşümcü liderlik davranışlarını sergilemektedir. Dönüşümsel liderlik boyutu ile örgütsel sinizmin, bilişsel ve davranışsal boyutları arasında ters yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Ya-pılan regresyon analizi sonucunda, dönüşümcü liderliğin örgütsel sinizmin bilişsel ve davranışsal boyutları üzerinde etkisi anlamlıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortaokul-ogretmenlerinin-algilarina-gore-okul-yoneticilerinin-liderlik-stilleri-ile-orgutsel-sinizm-arasindaki-iliski.pdf
  • 12
33
53
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Andersson, L. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a cont-ract violation framework. Human Relations, 49, 1395-1418. Başaran, E. (1991). Turkey education system. Ankara: Gül. Bass, B. M. (1997). Personal selling and transactional/ transformational le-adership. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 17(3), 19-28. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leaders-hip:1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrıal Training, 14(5), 21-27. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ-Multifactor leadership questionnairre. California: Mind Garden. Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A. & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change:Longitudinal effects of transformational leader be-havior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733-753.
Eray Demirçelik – Mehmet Korkmaz
50  OPUS © Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R. & Dean, J. W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 150-153. Outstanding Empirical Paper Award. Buluç, B. (2009). The relationships between organizational commitment and leadership styles of principals based on elementary school te-acher’s perceptions. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 15(57), 5-34. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). The relationship between the leadership styles of school administrators and mobbing. Journal of Hacettepe University Education Faculty, 33, 77-87. Çakıcı, A. & Doğan, S. (2014). The impact of organizational cynicism on business performance: A research in vocational colleges. Journal of Doğuş University, 15(1), 79-89. Çetin, Ş., Korkmaz, M. & Çakmakçı, C. (2012). Effects of transformational and transactional leadership and leader-member exchange on te-achers’ organizational citizenship behaviors, Educational Administ-ration: Theory and Practice,18(1), 7-36. Çınar, A. & Bozgeyikli, H. (2015). Perceptions of distributed leadership in the secondary school institutions. OPUS - International Journal of Society Researches, 5(9), 42-60. Dawis, W. D. & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organi-zational cyncism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439-465. Dean Jr, J. W., Brandes, P. & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cyni-cism. The Academy of Management Review, 2(23), 341-352. DeCelles, K. A., Tesluk, P. E. & Taxman, F. S. (2013). A field investigation of multilevel cynicism toward change. Organization Science, 24(1), 154–171. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2012). Education management theory, research and application (Trs. S.Turan). Ankara: Nobel. Howell, J. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transac-tional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891-902.
The Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of School Managers and Organizational Cynicism
According to the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers
OPUS © Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi  51
Jung, D. I., Chow, C. & Wu, A. (2003). The role transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525-544. Johnson, J. L. & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Be-havior, 24(5), 627-647. Kabataş, A. (2010). An examination of the relationship between organizational cynicism and organizational citizenship behavior and a research. (Un-published master’s thesis). Kocaeli University, Institute of Social Science, Kocaeli, Turkey. Kalağan, G. (2009). The relationship between researh assistants’ perceived orga-nizational support and organizational cynicism (Unpublished mas-ter’s thesis). Akdeniz University, Institute of Social Science, An-talya, Turkey. Kalağan, G. & Güzeller, C. O. (2010). The organizational cynicism levels of the teachers. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 27, 83-97. Karadağ, E., Kılıçoğlu, G. & Yılmaz, D. (2014). Organizational cynicism, school culture, and academic achievement: The study of structural equation modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 89-113. Karasar, N. (2007). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel. Karip, E. (1998). Transformational leadership. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16, 443-465. Korkmaz, M. (2005). Effects of leadership styles and emotions on teachers’ performance. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 43, 401-422. Kokmaz, M. (2006). The relationship between the personality characters of school managers and their leadership styles. Educational Administ-ration: Theory and Practice, 46, 199-226. Kokmaz, M. (2007). Effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 49, 57-91. Kokmaz, M. (2008). A study of relationship between leadership styles on the characterictics of learning organizations in Turkish public schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 53, 75-98.
Eray Demirçelik – Mehmet Korkmaz
52  OPUS © Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
Neves, P. (2012). Organizational cynicism: Spillover effects on supervisor–subordinate relationships and performance. The Leadership Quar-terly, 23(5), 965–976. Nourthouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice. NY: Sage. OED. (2014). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/, Özgan, H., Külekçi, E. & Özkan, M. (2012). Analyzing of the relationships between organizational cynicism and organizational commitment of teaching staff. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 196-205. Özgener, Ş., Öğüt, A. & Kaplan, M. (2008). A new paradigm in occupatio-nal-employer relations: Organizational cynicism, selected topics in organizational behavior. Mahmut Özdevecioğlu ve Himmet Kap-lan (Ed.), Ankara: İlke. Peng, Z. & Zhou, F. (2009). The moderating effect of supervisory consci-entiousness on the relationship between employee’s social cyni-cism and perceived interpersonal justice. Social Behavior and Perso-nality, 37(6), 863-864. Pelit, E. & Pelit, N. (2014). Two primary cancer-causing factors in organi-zations: Mobbing and organizational cynicism. Ankara: Detay. Polatcan, M. & Titrek, O. (2014). The relationship between leadership be-haviors of school principals and their organizational cynicism at-titudes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1291 – 1303. Robbins, S. & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior. (Trs. İ. Erdem). Ankara: Nobel. Sashkin, M. (1986). Participative management remains an ethical impera-tive. Organizational Dynamics, 14(4), 62–75 Schriesheim, C. A., Neider , L. L. & Scandura, T. A. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measure-ment issues. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 298-318. Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, 3th Edition, Jossey-Bass. TDK. (2013). Turkish Language Institute Current Turkish Dictionary. Ret-rieved from www.tdk.gov.tr,
The Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of School Managers and Organizational Cynicism
According to the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers
OPUS © Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi  53
Üçok, D. & Torun, A. (2014). The effects of negatıve attıtudes and expec-tatıonson burnout: a study on cynıcal attıtudes and perceıved psychologıcal contract breach. Atatürk University Journal of Econo-mics and Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 231-250. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees performance: An empirical examination of two compe-ting models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspec-tive. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111. Wu, C., Neubert, M. J. & Yi, X. (2007). Transformational leadership, cohe-sion perceptions, and employee cynicism about organizational change the mediating role of justice perceptions. The Journal of App-lied Behavioral Sciences, 43(3), 327-351. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com