You are here

Home » Content

FEN ÖĞRETİMİNDE KAVRAM YANILGILARININ KARAKTERİSTİKLERİNİN TANIMLANMASI

DESCRIBING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MISCONCEPTIONS IN SCIENCE TEACHING

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Many teachers think of their students as tabula rasa and assume a role as a teacher that is oriented to fill students' empty minds. The problem with this approach is that students' minds are not empty vessels that can be simply filled but already contain certain preconceptions and intuitions which pave the way to misconceptions. A misconception can be defined as an individual's understanding of a concept as substantially different from the commonly accepted scientific meaning of it. For students misconceptions are not different from other explanatory information and are organized very much the same way, developed for most scientific phenomena, and as a result are persistent to change. The reason is that misconceptions are developed by the students as a result of their observations in a long period of time and are invaluable for themselves. In case of not being able to overcome misconceptions the learning process is negatively effected. In this paper we discuss and present the reasons for developing misconceptions, their general characteristics and categories, and the ways of helping students to prevent developing misconceptions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çoğu öğretmen, öğrencilerini temiz zihinsel yazı tahtası olarak düşünür ve bu boş tahtayı doldurmak için rol üstlenir. Bu yaklaşımdaki problem, tahtaların boş olmadığı, zaten onların bazı önyargılar ve sezgiler içerdiğidir. Öğrencilerin deneyimsiz teorileri veya sezgileri kavram yanılgılarının geliştirilmesine yol açar. Kavram yanılgısı, bir kişinin bir kavramı anladığı şeklin, ortaklaşa kabul edilen bilimsel anlamından önemli derecede farklılık göstermesi şeklinde ifade edilebilir. Kavram yanılgıları, öğrenciler için diğer açıklayıcı bilgilerden fazla farklılık göstermezler, aynı şekilde düzenlenirler, yeni bilgilerin genelinde yer alırlar ve sonuç olarak kavram yanılgılarını ortadan kaldırmak zordur. Çünkü, yanlış kavramlar öğrencilerin kendi gözlemleri sonucu, uzun bir süreçte geliştirildikleri için bu kavramlar onlara daha yakın ve değerlidirler. Kavram yanılgılarının giderilememesi durumunda, öğrenme süreci ciddi bir şekilde engellenebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin kavram yanılgılarının oluşum nedenleri, genel özellikleri, sınıflandırılması ve yanılgıların oluşumlarının nasıl engellenebileceği tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-fen-ogretiminde-kavram-yanilgilarinin-karakteristiklerinin-tanimlanmasi.pdf
  • 1
102-120
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Baki, A. (1999). Cebirle İlgili İşlem Yanılgılarının Değerlendirilmesi. III. Fen
Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu. M.E.B. ÖYGM.
Brown
, D. E. (1989). Students concepts of forces: The importance of understanding
newton's third law. Physics Education, 24, 353 - 357 Brown, D. E. ve Clement, J. (1987). Misconceptions concerning newton's law of action reaction: the underestimated importance of the third law. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol III, Cornell University, 39 - 54 Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J. ve Symington, D. (1994). The constructivist paradigm and some implications for science content and pedagogy. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.) The content of science (147-160). London: The Falmer Press. 147¬160
Clement, J. (1987). Overcoming students misconceptions in physics: the role of anchoring intuitions and analogical validity. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol III, Cornell University, 84 - 97 Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. (1996). Science teaching
reconsidered: a handbook by the National Academy Press. Çakır, S.Ö. ve Yürük, N. (1999). Oksijenli ve Oksijensiz Solunum Konusunda Kavram Yanılgıları Teşhis Testinin Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu. M.E.B. ÖYGM Dobson, K. (1985). The Experience of physics. Physics Education. 20, 188 - 191 Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F. ve Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in
learning physics. Science Education. 76, 615 - 652 Eckstein, S. G. ve Shemesh, M. (1993). Stage theory of the development of alternative
conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30, 45- 64 Eryılmaz, A. ve Tatlı, A. (1999). ODTÜ Öğrencilerinin Mekanik Konusundaki Kavram
Yanılgıları.
III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu. M.E.B. ÖYGM Feldsine, J. E. (1987). Distinguishing student misconception from alternate conceptual frameworks through the construction of concept maps. Proceedings of the
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13 119
Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol I, Cornell University Florida Science Curriculum Framework, 1995.
Geban, Ö., Ertepınar, H., Yayla, N. ve Işık, A. (1999). Elektro-Kimya konusunda Kavram Yanılgıları. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu. M.E.B. ÖYGM Gezer, K., Köse, S. ve Sürücü, A. (1999). Fen Bilgisi Eğitim ve Öğretimin Durumu ve Bu Süreçte Laboratuarın Yeri. III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu.
M.E.B. ÖYGM
Gordon, J. (1996). Tracks for learning: Metacognition and learning technologies. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 12, (1), 46-55
Hammer, D. (1996). How many alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of Learning Sciences. 5,
(2), 97-127
Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling Games in the Newtonian World. American Journal of
Physics. 60, (8), 732
Hewson, P. ve Hewson, M. (1991). The Status of students conceptions Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel. 59-73 Ivowi, U. M. O. ve Oludotun, J. S. O. (1987). An Investigation of sources of misconceptions in physics. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational strategies in Science and Mathematics.
Vol III, Cornell University, 252 - 257
Kaptan,
F
. (1999). Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi. M.E.Basımevi, İstanbul. Kluegel, J. R. (1999). Sociology 280 Lecture Notes.
Linder, C. J. (1993). A Challenge to conceptual change. Science Education. 77, 293 -
300
Maloney, D. P. (1990). Forces as interactions. The Physics Teacher, September, 386 -
390
Marioni, C. (1989). Aspects of student's understanding in classroom settings: Case
studies on motion and inertia. Physics Education. 24, 273 - 277 Mestre, J. ve Touger, J. (1989). Cognitive research - What's in it for physics teachers?
The Physics Teacher. 27, 447-456 Novak, J. D. (1998). Metacognitive strategies to help students learning how to learn.
Prosser, M. Walker, P. Ve Millar, R. (1996). Differences in Students' Perceptions of
Learning Physics. Physics Education. 31, 43-48 Pyle, E. J. ve Jennifer, A. (1999) .The Effects of Visually Enhanced Instructional
Environments on Students' Conceptual Growth. Science Education. vol, 3 References For Misconceptions in Physics.(Revised July 9, 1998). Avaible on:
http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/~science/physmisc.htm Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B. ve Marek, E. (1990). Understandings and misundertsandings of eighth graders of four physics concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27,
35- 54
Roach, L. E. (1992). Demonstrating newton's third law. The Science Teacher,
December. 28 - 31
Riche, R. D. (2000). Strategies for Assisting Students Overcome Their Misconceptions in High School Physics. Memorial University of Newfoundland Education 6390
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13 120
Rowell, A. J., Dawson, C. J. ve Harry, L. (1990). Changing Misconceptions: a challenge to science education. International Journal Science Education. 12,
2, 167-175
Sandanand, N. ve Kess, J. (1990). Concepts in force and motion. The Physics Teacher
November. 28, 530 - 533
Saunders, W. L. ve Shepardon, D. A. (1987). Comparison of Concrete and Formal Science Instruction upon Science Achievement and Reasoning Ability of Sixth Grade Students. Journal of Research in Teaching. 24 (1), 39-51
Scott, P. H., Asoko, H. M. ve Driver, R. H. (1991). Teaching for conceptual change: a review of strategies Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.,
320 - 329
Schultz, K. Murray, T., Clement, J. ve Brown, D. (1987). Overcoming misconceptions with a computer based tutor. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol III, Cornell University, 434 - 448
Seiferth, M. S. (1997). Socratic teaching. (March 15, 2000)
Soylu, H. ve İbiş, M. (1999). Bilgisayar Destekli Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi. III. Fen Bilimleri
Eğitimi Sempozyumu.
M.E.B
. ÖYGM. Stepans, J. (1996). Targeting Students' Science Misconceptions: Physical Science
Concepts Using the Conceptual Change Model. Riverview, Fla.: Idea
Factory
Tao, P. K., ve Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer supported physics instruction. Jurnal of Research in
Science Teaching. (36), 859 - 882
Temiz, K. B. (2000). Lise 1. Sınıf Fizik Dersi Programının Öğrencilerin Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerini Geliştirmeye Uygunluğunun İncelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi)
Terry, C. Jones, G. ve Hurford W. (1985). Children's conceptual understanding of
forces and equilibrium. Physics Education. 20, 162 - 165 Tobias, S. (1987). In class methods for getting at student misconceptions. Proceedings
of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational
Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Vol III, Cornell University, 514-516 Tytler, R. (1998). The nature of students' informal science conceptions. International
Journal of Science Education. 20, (8), 901-927 Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. ve Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative
conceptions in science in Gabel. Dorothy J. Handbook of Research on
Science Teaching and Learning. MacMillan New York Wessel, W. (1999). Knowledge Construction in High School Physics: A Study Student Teacher
Interaction. Saskatchewan School Trustees Association Research Centre Report. Wolfe, E. (1998). Science Education; misconception. The Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education of the University of Toronto. Wright, E. L. ve Perna, J. A. (1992). Reaching for Excellence: A Template for Biology
Instruction. Science & Children. 30 (2), p. 35 Yılmaz, Ö., Tekkaya, C., Geban, Ö. ve Özden, Y. (1999). Lise 1. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Hücre
Bölünmesi Ünitesindeki Kavram Yanılgılarının Tespiti ve Giderilmesi.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com