You are here

İNTRAPERİTONEAL ADEZYONLARIN ÖNLENMESİNDE FOSFOLİPİD SOLÜSYONLARININ ETKİLERİ

PHOSPHOLIPID SOLUTIONS FOR PREVENTION OF INTRAPERITONEAL ADHESIONS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim: In this study we aimed to analyze effects of phospholipid solutions (preventing adhesions by increasing slipperiness between damaged surfaces and detaching them) during peritoneal reepitelization. Material and Method: Thirty Wistar Albino type rats divided in two groups. Caecum serosa was damaged using sterile gauzes to achive light serosal haemorrhagy and 1 cm2 of periton excised from right side of abdominal wall in all rats.Group I was applied 3 ml %0.9 NaCl and Group II was applied phospholipid solution (Fresnius Kabi - Deustchland) intrabdominally before closure. Rats sacrified at postopertive 10th day. After macroscopically examining adhesions, adhesion sur¬faces were calculated with a calibration scale. In microscopic examination lymphocytes, plasma cells, polymorphonuclear cells, histiocytes and fibroblasts were marked and counted with Clemex Image Analysis system. Results: In phospholipid group there was a significant decrease in adhesion for-mation compared to control group macroscopically. The decrease in adhesion formation was sta-tistically significant (p<0.05). There were also significant differences between two groups in micro-scopically observed fibroblast and PMNL ratios and this difference was also statistically significant. Conclusions: Usage of phopholipid solutions decreases postoperative adhesions. Application of phospholipid solutions is a cost-effective method for preventing consequent operations for intraab-dominal adhesions
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Çalışmamızda fosfolipid solüsyonlarının peritoneal reepitelizasyon sırasında hasarlı yüzeyler arasında kayganlık sağlayarak ve hasarlı yüzeyleri birbirinden ayırarak adezyon oluşumunu önlemedeki etkilerini incelemeyi planladık. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmada 30 adet Wistar Albino cinsi dişi rat 2 gruba ayrıldı. Bütün ratlara steril spançlar ile çekum serozasında noktasal hemoraji oluşturacak şekilde serozal hasar oluşturuldu, sağ taraftan 1 cm2 genişliğinde periton tabakası eksize edilerek aynı girişim uygulandı. Grup I (kontrol): 3 ml %09'luk NaCl, Grup II (fosfolipid): Abdomen kapatılmadan önce 75 mg/kg dozda % 10'luk fosfolipid solusyonu (Fresenius Kabi Deutschland) intraperitoneal verilerek abdomen kapatıldı. Postoperatif 10. günde ratlar sakrifiye edildi. Adezyon alanları makroskopik olarak incelendikten sonra yapışıklık oluşturmuş alanlar kalibrasyon cetveli kul¬lanılarak hesaplandı. Mikroskopik incelemede lenfositler, plazma hücreleri, polimorfonükleer hücre¬ler, histiyositler ve fibroblastlar farklı farklı işaretlenerek Clemex Image Analizi sistemi ile otomatik olarak sayıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda fosfolipid grubunda makroskopik olarak adezyon oluşumun¬da kontrol grubuna göre belirgin bir azalma tespit edildi. Bu fark istatiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0,05). Mikroskopik olarak fibroblast ve PMNL oranlarında her iki grup arasında farklılık saptanmış ve bu farklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre kullanılan fosfolipid solüsyonu postoperatif adezyonu azaltmaktadır. Maliyetinin düşük olması ve kolay uygulanabilmesi nedeniyle fosfolipid solusyonlarının postoperatif intraperitoneal adezyonları önlemede etkili olacağını düşünmekteyiz.
91-96

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:32-9.
2. Drollette CM, Badawy SZ. Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions. Modern trends in preventing infertility. J Reprod Med 1992;37:107-21.
3. Hills BA . Role of surfactant in peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int. 2000; 20:503-15.
4. Gotloib,L.Anatomy of the peritoneal membrane.In Wichtig Proc.1st Course on Peritoneal dialy-sis,1982.17.

5. DiPaolo ,N., Bouncristiani, U.,Capatondo ,L, Gaggiotti , E., De Mia M., Rossi P.,Sansoni, E.,ve ark. Phosphatidylcholine and peritoneal transport during peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 1986; 44: 365.
6. Beavis J, Harwood JL, Coles GA; Williams JD.Synthesis of phospholipids by human peri¬toneal mesothelial cells. Perit Dial Int . 1994; 14:
348-355.

7. Chailley-Heu B, Rubio S, Rougier JP, Ducroc R, Barlier-Mur AM, Ronco P, ve ark. Expression of hydrophilic Surfactant proteins by mesentery cells in rat and man Biochem J 1997; 328: 251-6.
8. Treutner Kh, Bertram P,Lerch MM,Klimaszewski M, Petrovic-kallham S, Sobesky J, ve ark. Prevention of postoperative adhesions by single intraperitoneal medication. J Surg Res 1995; 59: 764-71.
9. Ching SS, Muralikrisnan VP, Whiteley GS. Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome.Int J Clin Pract. 2003; 57:333-7.
10. Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL. Peritoneal adhesion: etiology, patho-physiology, and clinical significance. Racant advances in prevention and management. Dig
Surg. 2001; 18:260-73.
11. Sarr, M. G., Tito, W. A.: Intestinal Obstruction. Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, (Ed) Zuidema G. D., 4th Edition Vol 5, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sidney, Tokyo, WIB Saunders Company., 1996; 387-9.
12. Davidson , M. M., Park, R.: Systemic Administration of Heparin and Dicumarol for Postoperative Adhesions: An Experimental Study. Arch Surg.,
1949; 59:300-25.
13. Kramer K, Senninger N, Herbst H, Probst W. Effective prevention of adhesions with
hyaluronate. Arch Surg. 2002; 137:278-82.
14. Eyüboglu, E., Aydemir, I., Pusane, A., Düren, M., Taşkın, M. Aprotininin Sıçanlarda Oluşturulan Fibrinopürülan Peritonit Üzerindeki Etkisi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 1990; 21:325.
15. Hubay,C.A.,Weckesser,E. C., Holden,W.D.: The effect of Cortizone on the Prevention of peritoneal Adhesions. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.,1953; 96:65-70.
16. Jackmain, U. L., Shumacker, H. B.:Effect of Histadyl Upon The prevention of peritoneal
Adhesions. Am.J. Surg., 1962;104:20-1.
17. Dogru, O., Akkuş, M. A., Kaşarcı, E., Erdoğan, M.,Kısmet, K.: Gingko Biloba ve Karbondioksitin Peritoneal Yapışıklıklara Etkisi. Karadeniz Tıp
Dergisi, 1994; 7:104-7.
18. Duman, A., Tireli, M., Taşçı, T.: Mekanik Barsak
Tıkanmaları. Dicle Tıp Fak Mec., 1983; 46:336-8.
19. Çaglıkülekçi, M., Özarmagan, S., Günay, K., Savcı, N., Necefli, A.: Postoperatif intraperitoneal Adezyonların Önlenmesinde Povidon, Hyskon, Ca++Antagonistleri ve Vitamin E'nin yeri. Çagdaş
Cerrahi Dergisi,1993; 7:31-3.
20. Kubota,T.: Peritoneal Adhesions. Japan M. World,
1922; 11.226.
21. Cone, D. F.: The effect of Intestinal Motility on the Formation of Adhesions. Bull. Hopkins
Hosp.,1959; 105:8.
22. Avunduk Mc, Arbag H , The Effect Of Mitomycin C On Primary Wound Healing Of The Mucosa, European Surgical Research (39th Congress of the ESSR), 36, Suppl,2004; 80 - 1.
23. Ulku CH, Avunduk MC, Uyar Y, Arbag H: Biocompatibility of Vitallium as Ossicular Reconstruction Material in the Middle Ear: Experimental Animal Study. Acta Otolaryngol
2005 ;125:38-42.
24. Diamond, M. P.,and The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group : Reduction of De Novo Postsurgical Adhesions By Intraoperative Precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) Solution:A Prospective , Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study. Fertil. Steril., 1998; 69(6): 1067¬74.
25. Walwiener, D., Meyer,A., Bastert,G.: Adhesion Formation of the Parietal and Visceral peri-toneum:An Explanation for the Controversy on the Use of Autologous And Alloplastic Barriers? Fertil.Steril., 1998; 68(1):132-7.
26. Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck DE, Burns JW,
Chegini N, diZerega GS, ve ark. Adhesions: patho-genesis and prevention-panel discussion and sum¬mary. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:56-62
27. Sullins KE, White NA, Lundin CS, Dabareiner R, Gaulin G. Prevention of ischaemia-induced small intestinal adhesions in foals.Equine Vet
J.2004;36:370-5.
28. McEntee GP, Stuart RC, Byrne PJ, Leen E,
Hennessy TP. Experimental study of starch-induced intraperitoneal adhesions. Br J Surg .
1990; 77: 1113-4.
29. Aysan E, Kurt G, Aren A. The effect of diaphrag¬matic peritoneal lymphatics on peritoneal adhe¬sions: an experimental study. Lymphology. 2004;
37:134-40.
30. Yamaoka T, Takahashi Y, Fujisato T, Lee CW, Tsuji T, Ohta T, ve ark.. Novel adhesion prevention membrane based on a bioresorbable copoly(ester-ether) comprised of poly-L-lactide and Pluronic: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. J Biomed Mater Res.
2001;54:470-9.
31. Cohen Z, Senagore AJ, Dayton MT, Koruda MJ, Beck DE, ve ark. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based biore-sorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48:1130-9.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com