You are here

Huzurevinde yaşayan bireylerde oral mukozal durum

Oral mucosal conditions of Subjects living in nursing home

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The objectives of this study were to obtain information about oral mucosal conditions among elderly patients and to investigate the relationship between the findings in relation to age and sex. Material and Methods: The information regarding oral mucosal conditions was obtained from interviews of 42 patients. Results: The incidence of oral mucosal conditions was 92,9%. The incidence of oral mucosal conditions indicated a significant increase with advancing age. Varices (n:15), fissured tongue (n:13) and atrophic tongue papillae (n:13) were the three most common conditions; and the incidence increased with age. Conclusion: The current results support those of other investigators in that the presence of oral mucosal conditions in elderly population is related to age and sex.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yaşlı hastalarda oral mukozal durum hakkında bilgi toplamak ve bu bulgularla yaş ve cinsiyet arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Oral mukozal durum hakkındaki bilgiler 42 hastadan toplandı. Bulgular: Mukozal durum prevalansı %92,9'du. Oral mukozal durum prevalansının yaşın artmasıyla birlikte önemli miktarda arttığı görüldü. Lingual varikosit (n:15), fissürlü dil (n:13) ve atrofik dil (n:13) en yaygın görülen üç durumdu ve yaşla birlikte prevalansları artmıştı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızdaki bulgular (yaş ve cinsiyete bağlı oral mukozal durum varlığı) diğer araştırıcıların sonuçlarını destekler niteliktedir.
7-10

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Zach L. The Oral Cavity. Rossman I. (Ed) Clinical Geriatrics PbiladeiphiaJ.B.LippincottCo., 1979;618-637.
2.
Nazlıe
l HÇ. Yaşlıda ağız ve diş sağlığı. Turkish Journal ofGeriatrics 1999;2:14-21.
3. Pindborg JJ. Oral cancer and precancer as diseases of the aged. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:300-7.
4. Vigild M. Oral mucosal lesions among institutionalized elderly in Denmark. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:309-13.
5. Fleishman R, Peles DB, Pisanti S. Oral mucosal lesions among elderly in Israel. J Dent Res 1985;64:831-36.
S.D.Ü. Tıp pak.
Derg
. 2008:15(3)/7-10
10
Yılmaz, yaşlılarda oral mukozal durum
6. Lin HC, Corbet EF, Lo EC. Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res 2001;80: 1486-90.
7. Scott J, Cheah SB. The prevalence oforal mucosal lesions in the elderly in a surgical biopsy population: aretrospective analysis of4042 cases. Gerontology
1989;8:73-8.
8. Budtz-Jorgensen E. Oral mucosal lesions associated with the wearing ofremovable dentures. J Oral Pathol 1981;10:65-80.
9. Dorey JL, Blasberg B, MacEntee MI et al. Oral mucosal disorders in denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:210-13.
10. Jorge Junior J, de Almeida OP, Bozzo L et al. Oral mucosal health and disease in institutionalized elderly in Brazil. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19:173-75.
11. MacEntee MI, Glick N, Stolar E. Age, gender, dentures and oral mucosal disorders. Oral Diseases 1998;4:32-6.
12. Corbet EF, Holmgren CJ, Phillipsen HP. Oral mucosal lesions in 65-74-year-old Hong Kong Chinese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:392-95.
13. Kaplan I, Moskona D. A clinical survey oforal soft tissue lesions in institutionalized geriatric patients in Israel. Gerontology 1990;9:59-62.
14. Nevalainen MJ, Narhi TO, Ainamo A. Oral mucosal lesions and oral hygiene habits in the home-living elderly. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:332-37.
15. Rossi EP, Hirsch SA. A survey of4,793 oral lesions with emphasis on neoplasia and premalignancy. J Am DentAssoc 1977;94:883-86.
16. Silverglade LB, Stablein MJ. Diagnostic survey of 9,000 biopsies from three age groups: under 60 years, 60-69 and over 70. Gerodontics 1988;4:285-88.
17. Jainkittivong A, Aneksuk V, Langlais RP. Oral mucosal conditions in elderly dental patients. Oral Diseases 2002;8:218-23.
18. World Health Organization. Guide to epidemiology and diagnosis oforal mucosal diseases and conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:1-26.
19. Hand JS, Whithill JM. The prevalence oforal mucosal lesions in an elderly population. J Am Dent Assoc
1986;112:73-6.
20. Smith JM, Sheiham A. How dental conditions handicap the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7:305-10.
21. Taiyeb Ali TB, Razak JA, Raja Latifah RJ et al. An epidemiological survey oforal mucosal conditions among elderly Malaysians. Gerontology 1995;12:37-40.
22. WolffA, Ship JA, Tylenda CA et al. Oral mucosal appearance is unchanged in healthy different-aged person. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:569-72.
23. Zain RB, Ikeda N, Razak IA et al. A national epidemiological survey oforal mucosal lesions in
Malaysia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:377-83.
24. Darwazeh AMG, Pillai K. Prevalence oftongue lesions in 1013 Jordanian dental outpatients. Oral Surg 1973;36:34-8.
25. Kovac-Kavcic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence oforal mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovania. J Oral Pathol Med 2000;29:331-35.
26. Reichart PA. Oral mucosal lesions in a representative cross-sectional study of aging Germans. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:390-98.
27.
Çelenligi
l H. Yaşlıda Diş Hastalıkları. Kutsal YG,Çakmakçı M,Ünal S (Ed) Geriatri. Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Ankara, 1997; 2:815-37.
28. Pindborg JJ. Pathology and Treatment ofDiseases in Oral Mucous Membranes and Salivary Glands. Holm-Pedersen P, Löe H (Ed.): Geriatric Dentistry. A Textbook ofOral Gerontology. Munksgaar Copenhagen, 1986;290-306.
29. Bohmer T, Mowe M. The association between atrophic glossitis and protein-calorie malnutrition in old age. Age Ageing 2000;29:47-50.
30. Thomson WM, Brown RH, Williams SM. Dentures, prosthetic treatment needs, and mucosal health in an institutionalised elderly population. N Z Dent J 1992;88:51-5.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com