You are here

ENTICERS AND BARRIERS TO E-LEARNING BASED DISTANCE CORPORATE TRAINING: The Case of a Greek Bank

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to investigate what influences employees‘ acceptance and resistance to a corporate e-learning initiative provided by one of the leading Banks in Greece. The results of the research provide insight into the barriers and enticers in relation to e-learning and identify areas for improvement, with a view to developing and implementing efficient corporate e-learning initiatives. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research was conducted in order to examine the factors affecting learner‘s interest in, and resistance to e-learning along four axes: a) technology, b) time c) interaction/support, d) reward/recognition. Distractions to study and continuous interruptions were identified as the most serious barrier faced by the trainees, as e-learning material is available only on the Bank‘s intra-net, ie only at the work place and during working hours. Linking the completion of an e-learning course to a particular job description or to an opportunity for employee promotion, as well as the integration of the e-learning courses into a comprehensive training system leading to a certified business title, were identified, among others, as particularly encouraging factors.
109-120

REFERENCES

References: 

Andreu R. & Jauregui, K. (2005). Key factors of e-learning: A case study at a Spanish bank. Journal of Information Technology Education, 4. Retrieved October 24, 2008 from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol4/v4p001-031Andreu.pdf
Balaban-Sali, J. (2008).Designing motivational learning systems in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(3). Retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde31/pdf/article_13.pdf
Bassili, J. N. (2008). Motivation and cognitive strategies in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Distance Education 22(3), 129-148.
Berge, Z. L. & Kendrick A. A.(2005). Can interest in distance training be sustained in corporate organizations? International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(2). Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Feb_05/article05.htm
Bird M.,Hammersley M., Gomm R. & Woods P. (1999).Educational Research in Practice –Study Manual. Patra: Hellenic Open University.
Cho S. Κ. & Berge Z. L. (2002). Overcoming barriers to distance training and education. USDLA Journal 16(1). Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/ JAN02_Issue/article01.html
Clem, F. A. (2004). Culture and motivation in online learning environments. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27th, Chicago, IL, October 19-23. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 485100).
Cocea, M. (2006). Assessment of motivation in online learning environments http://www.ncirl.ie/dynamic/File/Research/Technical%20Report%20aug%202006. Mihaela%20Cocea.doc . Retrieved October 10, 2008.
DfES-Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Towards a unified e-learning strategy. Consultation Document July 2003. Retrieved May 21, 2009 from http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/consultations/downloadableDocs/towards%20a%20unif...
Goff-Kfouri, C.A. (2006). On-line learning: one way to bring people together. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 491937).
Goolnik, G. (2002). E-Learning for smaller rurally based businesses: A demand-led challenge for Scottish educational institutions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(2). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ ojdla/summer52/ goolnik52.htm
Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the course: a study in online student satisfaction and retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter94/herbert94.htm
119
Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to motivate: motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 2(3). Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/2.3.1.pdf
Kelsey, K.D. & D‘souza, A. (2004). Student motivation for learning at a distance: Does interaction matter? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer72/ kelsey72.htm
Kim, K.-J. (2004). Motivational Influences in self-directed online learning environments: a qualitative case study. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27th , Chicago, IL, October 19-23.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 485041).
Kim, T. L. S., Way, W. K. & Lee, T. A. (2007). Asynchronous electronic discussion group: analysis of postings and perception of in-service teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(1). Retrieved October 10, 2008 from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde25/ pdf/article_2.pdf
Koohang, A. & Durante, A. (2003). Learners` perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2. Retrieved October 27, 2008 from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol2/v2p105-113-78.pdf
Kuo, M.M. (2005). A comparison of traditional videoconference-based and web-based learning environments. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 492702).
Leary, J. & Berge, Z.L. (2007). Challenges and strategies for sustaining eLearning in small organizations. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall103/ berge103.htm
Lee, D. & Chamers, T. (2001). Web-based training and corporate America. Annual proceedings of selected research and development and practice papers presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 470195).
Lee-Baldwin, J. (2005). Asynchronous discussion forums: a closer look at the structure, focus and group dynamics that facilitate reflective thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1). Retrieved October 29, 2008 from http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss1/ currentpractice/article2.cfm
Malhorta K. N. (1996). Marketing Research (an applied orientation). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall International , Inc.
Markel, S.L. (2001). Technology and education online discussion forums: It‘s in the response. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer42/markel42.htm
Miller, M.D., Rainer, R.K. & Corley, J.K. (2003). Predictors of engagement and participation in an on-line course. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(1). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ ojdla/spring61/miller61.htm
120
Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Retrieved October 15, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1069
Nichols, M. (2008). E-learning in context. E-Primer Series, no. 1. Retrieved May 21, 2009 from http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/sites/default/files/ng/group-661/n877-1---e-lea...
O‘ Malley, J. (1999). Students perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter24/ omalley24.htm
Peachey, P., Jones, P. & Jones, A. (2006). Encouraging student participation in an online course using ―pull‖ initiatives. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 4(1).Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.ejel.org/Volume-4/v4-i1/v4-i1-art-9.htm
Rabak, L. & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2006). Acceptance and resistance to corporate e-learning: A case from the retail sector. Journal of Distance Education 21(2), 115-134.
Rivera, J.C. & Rice, M. L. (2002).A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). Retrieved October 31, 2008 from http://westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.htm
Rodriguez, M.C., Ooms, A., Montanez, M. & Yan, Y. L. (2005). Perceptions of online learning quality given comfort with technology, motivation to learn technology skills, satisfaction & online learning experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 491688).
Roy, A., & Raymond, L. (2008). Meeting the training needs of SMEs: is e-learning a solution? Electronic Journal of e-learning 6(2). Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.ejel.org/Volume-6/v6-i2/v6-i2-art-2.htm
Schmidt, J. T. & Werner, C. H. (2007). Designing online instruction for success: future oriented motivation and self-regulation. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(1), 69-78. Available online at www.ejel.org
Stansfield, M., McLellan, E. & Connolly, T. (2004). Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to face class delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education,3. Retrieved October 27, 2008 from http://www.jite.org/ documents/Vol3/ v3p173-188-037.pdf
Stodel, E.J., Thompson, T.L. & MacDonald, C.J. (2006). Learners‘ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 7(3). Retrieved October 14, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php /irrod/article/view/325/744
Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Retrieved October 15, 2008 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/ 83/161

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com