You are here

Reflections of Prospective Teachers Regarding Case-Based Learning

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The growing interest toward case-based learning for teacher education can be attributed to the inherent potential of cases in terms of providing prospective teachers with opportunities to engage in analyzing and solving realistic teaching cases and to apply what they learned in classes to solve these practical teaching issues. The objective of this research is to determine the perceptions of prospective teachers toward case-based learning in a teaching methods course. Participants of the current study were 38 prospective teachers (17 males and 21 females) attending the third year of a computer education and instructional technology department in Turkey. In the present study, qualitative research methods were utilized to explore prospective teachers’ perceptions regarding case based learning. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participating teacher candidates and to analyze and interpret the data content analysis and concordance method were exploited. The results suggest that in general the cases provided a valued opportunity to engage developing teachers in solving real life problems that tend to occur in actual teaching. The other evidences emerged from the study suggest that cases can help prospective teachers be prepared for their early teaching experiences in real classrooms by improving their understandings of how to respond to actual problems they will encounter in their fields and how to apply what they learned in classes to solve practical teaching issues. Suggestions were made for further research.
64
78

REFERENCES

References: 

Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2012). Enhancing students’ approaches to learning: the added value of gradually implementing case-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, DOI: 10.1007/s10212-012-0116-7.
Blackmon, M., Hong, Y., & Choi, I.. (2007). Case-Based Learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved June 20, 2012 from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
Boehrer, J., & Linsky, M. (1990). Teaching with cases: Learning to question.” In M.D. Svinicki (ed.), The Changing Face of College Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 42. San Francisco,: Jossey-Bass.
Boling, E. (2007). Linking technology, learning, and stories: Implications from research on hypermedia video-cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 189-200.
Bowers, J., & Doerr, H. (2003). Designing Multimedia Case Studies for Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(2), 135-161.
Bruning, R., Siwatu, K. O., Liu, X., PytlikZillig, L. M., Horn, C., Sic, S., & Carlson, D. (2008). Introducing teaching cases with face-to-face and computer-mediated discussion: Two multi-classroom quasi-experiments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 299-326.
Cherubini, L. (2009). Exploring prospective teachers' critical thinking: Case-based pedagogy and the standards of professional practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 228-234.
Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: Classroom management problems for prospective teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 99-129.
Doebler, L., Roberson, T., & Ponder, C. (1998). Preservice teacher case study responses: A preliminary attempt to describe program impact. Education, 119(2), 349-359.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
77
Edmunds, D. B. (2007). The impact of a cognitive flexibility hypermedia system on preservice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Edwards, S., & Hammer, M. (2006). Laura’s story: using problem based learning in early childhood and primary teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 465-477.
Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., & Lewandowski, J. (2001). Increasing preservice teachers’ capacity for technology integration through use of electronic models. Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology: Vol. 1-2. Atlanta, GA: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Flynn, A. E., & Klein, J. D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71-86.
Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: A case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-214.
Hughes, J. E., Packard, B. W., & Pearson, P. D. (1999). The role of hypermedia cases on preservice teachers views of reading instruction. Action in Teacher Education. (Also available as CIERA Report #3-005. Ann Arbor: CIERA/University of Michigan.)
Joseph A. M. (2002). Case-based instruction: A technique for increasing conceptual application in introductory psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 65-74.
Joseph A. M. (2004). Using case-based instruction to bridge the gap between theory and practice in psychology of adjustment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 137-146.
Kagan, D. M. (1993). Contexts for the use of classroom cases. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 703-723.
Kim. H., & Hannafin, M. J. (2009). Web-enhanced case-based activity in teacher education: A case study. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 37(2), 151-170.
Kinzer, C.K., Labbo, L.D., Teale, W., Leu, D. J., Hillinger, M., Cammack, D. et al. (2001). Designing preservice, case-based reading instruction: Background and goals of the CTELL Project. Unpublished manuscript.
Koç, M. (2011). Let’s make a movie: Investigating pre-service teachers’ reflections on using video-recorded role playing cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 95-106.
Koç, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1158-1168.
Lee, K., & Choi, I. (2008). Learning classroom management through web-based case instruction: Implications for early childhood teacher education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 495-503.
Lundeberg, M. A., & Levin, B. B. (2003). Prompting the development of preservice teachers’ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based learning and technology. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 23-42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Lundeberg, M.A., Levin, B.B., & Harrington, H.L (1999). Where do we go from here? Reflections on methodologies and future directions. In Lundeberg, M.A., Levin, B.B. & Harrington, H.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2012, 3(4)
78
(Eds.). Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Mayo, J. A. (2004). Using case-based instruction to bridge the gap between theory and practice in psychology of adjustment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17(2), 137-146.
Merseth, K. (1996). Cases and Case Methods in Teacher Education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.722-744). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2007). Immediate and delayed effects of using a classroom case exemplar in teacher education: The role of presentation format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 194-206.
Quek, C.L.G. (2010). Supporting beginning teachers’ case–based learning in a technology-mediated learning environment . In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp.783-786). Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Quek-concise.pdf.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Russell, T. (2001). Radical program change in pre-service teacher education: What and how we learn from personal and institutional experience. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339-349.
Schrader, P., Leu, Jr., D., Kinzer, C., Ataya, R., Teale, W., Labbo, L., & Cammack, D. (2003). Using Internet delivered video-cases to support pre-service teachers’ understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science, 31, 317-340.
Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J.H Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 18, 457-521.
Wang, F. K. (2002). Designing a case-based e-learning system: what, how, and why. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 30-43.
Youngs, P., & Bird, T. (2010). Using embedded assessments to promote pedagogical reasoning among secondary teaching candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 185-198.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com