You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BENLİK SAYGISI PUANLARI KONTROL EDİLEREK KENDİNİNİ SABOTAJ EĞİLİMLERİNİN ÇEŞİTLi DEĞİŞKENLERE GÖRE İNCELENMESİ

INVESTIGATION OF SELF-HANDICAPPING TENDENCIES OF TEACHER CANDIDATES ACCORDING TO DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES BY CONTROLLING SELF-ESTEEM SCORES

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2013
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4398

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to analyze self-handicapping tendencies of teacher candidates as to gender, type of accommodation, place of settlement, level of income, satisfaction with the undergraduate program and as to whether the undergraduate program was their ideal or not by controlling self-respect points. The sample of the research consists 4th grade of 280 voluntary selected through random sampling among 1024 students studying in different departments of Aksaray University, Faculty of Education located in Turkey. 94 students (33.6%) were female, 186 (66.4%) were male. Teacher candidates' ages ranged from 20-29. For collection data of students, a scale developed by Rhodewalt and adopted to Turkish by Akın, Abacı ve Akın (2010), and the Self-Handicapping Scale (SHS) developed by Rosenberg and adopted to Turkish by Çuhadaroğlu (1986) the Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) were used in this study. Analysis of the data, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), Bonferroni test was used to test the source of the difference. The findings obtained from the study show that no significant difference exists in SHS points of teacher candidates corrected according to RSES points as to gender, type of accommodation, settlement they have come from, income level and as to whether the undergraduate program they have studied is their ideal or not. On the other hand, as we examined the means of SHS points corrected according to RSES points, it has been determined that the SHS points of those who were not satisfied with their undergraduate program was higher, but that the effect size of the variable concerning the satisfaction with the undergraduate program on SHS points was small.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı benlik saygısı puanları kontrol edilerek öğretmen adaylarının kendini sabotaj eğilimleri cinsiyet, barınma şekli, yerleşim yeri, gelir düzeyi, lisans programından memnuniyeti ve lisansprogramının ideali olup olmadığına göre incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, Türkiye’de Aksaray Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinin çeşitli bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 1024 öğrenciden seçkisiz örnekleme yoluyla belirlenen 280 gönüllü öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Öğrencilerin tamamı 4.sınıf öğrencisidir. 94’ü (%33.6) kız, 186’sı (%66.4) erkektir. Öğretmen adaylarının yaşları 20-29 arasında değişmektedir Öğrencilerin Kendini sabotaj düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla Rhodewalt (1990) tarafından geliştirilen ve Türkçe’ye Akın, Abacı ve Akın (2010) tarafından uyarlanan Kendini Sabotaj Ölçeği (SHS); Benlik saygısını belirlemek amacıyla Rosenberg tarafından geliştirilen ve Çuhadaroğlu (1986) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Ölçeği (RSES) ve bağımsız değişkenlerle ilgili bilgi elde etmek amacıyla araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada verilerin analizinde Kovaryans Analizi (ANCOVA), farkın kaynağının test edilmesinde Bonferroni Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adaylarının RSES puanlarına göre düzeltilmiş SHS puanlarında cinsiyet, barınma şekli, geldikleri yerleşim yeri, gelir düzeyi ve öğrenim gördükleri lisans programın ideali olup olmadığına göre anlamlı bir fark olmadığı bulunmuştur. Bunun yanında RSES puanlarına göre düzeltilmiş SHS puan ortalamaları incelendiğinde lisans programından memnun olmayanların SHS puanlarının daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuş, ancak lisans programından memnuniyet değişkeninin SHS puanları üzerindeki etki büyüklüğünün küçük olduğu görülmüştür. Bulgular doğrultusunda sonuçlar tartışılmış ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_79199_8_pp_263-277.pdf
  • 3
263-277
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ABACI, R., & AKIN, A. (2011). Kendini Sabotaj. [Self Handicapping]. Ankara: Pegem A
Akademi Publisching.
AKIN, A., ABACI, R., & AKIN, Ü. (2010). Kendini sabotaj ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik
çalışması. [Self-handicapping scale: validity and reliability]. 16. National Psychology
Congress, Turkey.
AKER, S., DÜNDAR, C. BÖKE, Ö. & PEġKEN, Y. (2004). Ondokuz mayıs üniversitesi tıp
fakültesi uzmanlık öğrencilerinde tükenmiĢlik düzeyleri ve benlik saygısı. [Nineteen May
University medical school students, burnout levels of expertise and self-esteem]. Journal of
Turkish Psychology Psychopharmacology (3P), 12 (4). 295-306.
http://www.psikiyatridizini.org/viewarticle.php?article_id=1796.
272 Rezzan GÜNDOĞDU
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
ANLI, G. (2011). Kendini sabotaj ile psikolojik iyi olma arasındaki iliĢkinin çeĢitli değiĢkenler
açısından incelenmesi. [Examining the relationship between self-handicapping and
psychological well-being in terms of different variables]. (Unpublished master
dissertation). Sakarya University, Turkey.
ARKĠN, R. M. & BAUMGARDNER, A.H. (1985). Self-Handicapping. In J.H. Harvey ve G.
Weary (Eds). Atrribution Basic Issues And Applications (p.169-202). New York:
Academic Press.
BAĠLĠS, D. S. (2001). Benefits of self-handicapping in sport: A field study of university athletes.
Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 33(4), 213-223. Retrieved from
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:OhKxn3OBVFgJ.
DOI.apa.org/journals/cbs/33/4/213.pdf
BAUMEĠSTER, R. F., TĠCE, D. M. & HUTTON, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations
and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547-579. Retrieved
from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x/ab....
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x
BAUMEĠSTER, R. F. (1997). Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as
factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology, 1,145-174.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/gpr/1/2/145/ DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.145
BERGLAS, S. & JONES, E.E. (1978). Drug Choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to
non-contigent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 36(4), 405-417.
Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=1979-
05889-001. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405
BECK, B. L., KOONS, S. R., & MĠLGRĠM, D. L. (2000). Correlates and consequences of
behavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness,
self-esteem and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 3-
13. Retrieved from http: //web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=2&hid=107
&sid=19d28d58-9dc3-4ac7-8ed3-0109da830699%40sessionmgr110
BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, ġ. (2003). Veri Analizi El Kitabı. [Manual Data Analysis]. Ankara: Pegem A
Publishing.
COHEN, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement.
Vol, 12, No, 4, pp, 425-434. Retrieved from http://apm.sagepub.com/content/12/4/425.refs
DOI: 10.1177/014662168801200410.
ÇUHADAROĞLU, F. (1986). Adölesanlarda benlik saygısı. [Self-esteem in adolescents].
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Turkey.
DEGREE, C. E. & SNYDER, C .R. (1985). Adler’s Psychology (of use) today: Personal history of
traumatic life events as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 48(6), 1512-1519. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/48/6/1512/ DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1512
DĠETRĠCH, D. (1995). Gender differences in self-handicapping: Regardless of academic or social
competence implications. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 402-410. Retrieved from
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sbp/sbp/1995/00000023/00000004/art... DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.403
DĠNÇER, F. & ÖZTUNÇ, G. (2009). HemĢirelik ve ebelik öğrencilerinin benlik saygısı ve
atılganlık düzeyleri. [Self-esteem and assertiveness levels of nursing and midwifery
Investigation Of Self-Handicapping Tendencies Of Teacher Candidates
According To Demographic Variables By Controlling Self-Esteem Scores 273
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
students]. Hacettepe University Healthy Science Journal of Nursing. pp.22-33. Retrieved
from http://hacettepehemsirelikdergisi.org/pdf/pdf_HHD_77.pdf.
DOEBLER, T. C., SCHĠCK, C., BECK, B. & ASTOR-STETSON, E. (2000). Ego protection: The
effects of gender and perfectionism on acquired and claimed self-handicapping and selfesteem.
College Student Journal, 34, 524-537. Retrieved from
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/College-Student-Journal/6975004....
ERKUġ, A. (2005). Bilimsel AraĢtırma Sarmalı. [Spiral of Scientific Research]. Ankara: Seçkin
Publishing.
EROL, A., TOPRAK, G., YAZICI, F. & EROL, S. (2000). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Yeme
bozukluğu belirtilerini yordayıcı olarak kontrol odağı ve benlik saygısının karĢılaĢtırılması.
[University Students locus of control and self-esteem as a predictor of eating disorder
symptoms compared]. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 3, 147-152. Retrieved from
http://klinikpsikiyatri.org/files/journals/1/71.pdf.
ERġAN, E. E., DOĞAN, O. & DOĞAN, S. (2009). Beden eğitimi ve antrenörlük bölümü
öğrencilerinde benlik saygısı düzeyi ve bazı sosyal demografik özelliklerle iliĢkisi.
[Students in the department of physical education and coaching relationship between selfesteem
level, and some of the social demographic characteristics]. Journal of Clinical
Psychiatry, 12(1), 35-42. Retrieved from
http://www.klinikpsikiyatri.org/files/journals/1/2095.pdf.
HAMARTA, E. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yakın iliĢkilerindeki bazı değiĢkenlerin (benlik
saygısı, depresyon ve saplantılı düĢünme) bağlanma stilleri açısından incelenmesi.
[Investigation of some variables (self-esteem, depression and pre-occupied thinking) in
intimate relationships of university students with respect to their attachment styles].
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selçuk University, Turkey.
HARRĠS, R. N. & SNYDER, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451-458. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/51/2/451/. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.451
HĠRT, E. R., MCCREA, S. & BORĠS, H. (2003). “I know you self-handicapped last exam”:
Gender differences in reaction to self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 84, 177-193. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/84/1/177/
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.177
ĠNELMEN, K. (1996). Relationship of Sex Role Orientation to Two Measures of Self-Esteem.
(Unpublished master dissertation). Boğaziçi University, Turkey.
JONES, E. E. & BERGLAS, S. (1978). Control of attribution about the self through selfhandicapping
strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 4, 200-206. Retrieved from
http://ethicstalk.cmich.edu/selfhandicap.pdf. DOI: 10.1177/014616727800400205
JONES, E. E. & RHODEWALT, F. (1982). The Self-Handicapping Scale. Department of
Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
KARAATLI, M. (2006). Verilerin Düzenlenmesi ve Gösterimi. [Preparation and Presentation of
data (Eds. ġeref Kalaycı)]. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. [SPSS
Applied Multivariate Statistical Techniques], Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. ġti.
274 Rezzan GÜNDOĞDU
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
KARASAR, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Nobel
Publishing.
KARADAĞ, G., GÜNER, Ġ., ÇUHADAR, D. & UÇAN, Ö. (2008). Gaziantep üniversitesi sağlık
yüksekokulu hemĢirelik öğrencilerinin benlik saygısı. [Gaziantep University nursing
students in health school self-esteem]. Euphrates Journal of Health Services, 3(7), 29-42.
Retrieved from http://web.firat.edu.tr/shmyo/edergi/ciltucsayiyedi/karadagveark7.pdf
KARAHAN, T. F., SARIDOĞAN, M., ġAR, A., H., ERSANLI, E., KAYA, S. & NEVRES, K. H.
(2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeyleri ile benlik saygısı düzeyleri arasındaki
iliĢkiler. [Relationships between levels of self-esteem and loneliness levels of university
students]. 19 May University Journal of Education , 4(18), 27-39.
KESKĠN, H. Ü. (2006). Kovaryans Analizi. [Analysis of covariance ġ. Kalaycı (Eds)]. SPSS
Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. [SPSS Applied Multivariate Statistical
Techniques (pp. 184-196)], Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. ġti. Publishing
KĠMBLE, C. E., KĠMBLE, E. A., & CROY, N. A. (1998). Development of self-handicapping
tendencies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(4), 524-534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600406
KÜÇÜK, D. P. (2010). Müzik öğretmeni adaylarının sınav kaygısı, benlik saygısı ve çalgı
baĢarıları arasındaki iliĢkinin incelenmesi. [Music teacher candidates' test anxiety, selfesteem,
and instrumental examination of the relationship between achievement]. Ahi Evran
University Journal of Education, 11(3), 37-50. Retrieved from
http://kefad.ahievran.edu.tr/archieve/pdfler/Cilt11Sayi3/JKEF_11_3_2010_...
LUCAS, J. W. & LOVAGLĠA, M. J. (2005). Self-handicapping: Gender, race, and status. Current
Research in Social Psychology, 10(15),234-249.
http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.10.16.html
MARTĠN, K. A. & BRAWLEY, L. R. (2002). Self-handicapping in physical achievement settings:
The contributions of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 1(4), 337-351.
Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15298860290106814 DOI:
10.1080/1529886029010681 4
MAġRABACI, T.S. (1994). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Benlik Saygısı
Düzeylerinin Bazı DeğiĢkenlere Göre Ġncelenmesi. [First Grade Students' Self-Esteem
Levels of Hacettepe University Study of Some Variables]. (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation), Hacettepe University, Turkey.
MCCREA, S. M., & HĠRT, E. R. (2001). The role of ability judgments in self-handicapping.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1378-1389.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710013
MELLO-GOLDNER, D. & JACKSON, J. (2000). Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) as a self
handicapping strategy among college women. Social Behavior and Personality, 14(4), 607-
616.
MĠDGLEY, C., ARUNKUMAR, R. & URDAN, T. (1996). If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a
reason: Predictors of adolescent’s use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 88, 423-434. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1996-01787-004
DOI:apa.org/journals/edu/88/3/423.pdf
Investigation Of Self-Handicapping Tendencies Of Teacher Candidates
According To Demographic Variables By Controlling Self-Esteem Scores 275
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
NEWMAN, L. & WADAS, R. (1997). When the stakes are higher: Self-esteem instability and selfhandicapping.
Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 217-233. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&UID=1997-03744-017
NURMĠ, J. E., ONATSU, T. & HAAVĠSTO, T. (1995). Underachievers’ cognitive and behavioral
strategies: Self handicapping at school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 188-
200. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476
X85710120 DOI: //dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1012
OTTEKĠN, N. (2009). Ailelerinden ayrı olarak öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin benlik
saygısı ve umutsuzluk düzeylerinin incelenmesi. [Analyze the hopelessness state and self
respecet levels of university students who live apart from their families]. (Unpublished
master dissertation). Selçuk University, Turkey.
ÖZKAN, Ġ. A. & ÖZEN, A. (2008). Öğrenci hemĢirelerde boyun eğici davranıĢlar ve benlik saygısı
arasındaki iliĢki. [Student nurses, submissive behavior and the relationship between selfesteem].
TAF Prev Med Bull., 7(1), 53-58. http://www.scopemed.org/?mno=342
PRAPAVESSĠS, H., & GROVE, J. R. (1998). Self- handicapping and self-esteem. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 10(2), 175-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413209808406386
RHODEWALT, F., & DAVĠSON, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role
of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4),
307-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0704_5
RHODEWALT, F. (1990). Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for
anticipatory self-protective acts. In R.L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder & S. Berglas (Eds), Selfhandicapping:
The paradox that isn’t (s.69-106). New York: Plenum Press.
RHODEWALT, F., MORF, C., HAZLETT, S. & FAĠRFĠELD, M. (1991). Self-Handicapping: The
role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 122-131. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/61/1/122/ DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.122
RHODEWALT, F. & VOHS, K. (2005). Defensive strategies, motivation, and the self: A Selfregulatory
process view. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence
and motivation (s.548-565). New York: Guilfors Press.
SAHRANÇ, Ü. (2011). An investigation of the relationships between self-handicapping and
depresion, anxiety, and stress. International Online Journal Of Educational Sciences , 3(2),
526-540. Retrieved from http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_566.pdf
SAYGIN, Y. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal destek, benlik saygısı ve öznel iyi oluĢ
düzeylerinin incelenmesi. [Investigating social support, self-esteem and subjectiwe wellbeing
levels of university students]. (Unpublished master dissertation), Selçuk University,
Turkey.
SHEPPERD, J. A. & ARKĠN, R. M. (1989). Determinants of self-handicapping: Task importance
and the effects of pre-existing handicaps on self-generated handicaps. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 252-265. Retrieved from
http://psp.sagepub.com/content/15/2/252.abstract DOI: 10.1177/0146167289152012
276 Rezzan GÜNDOĞDU
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
SHĠELDS, C. D. (2007). The relationship between goal orientation, parenting style, and selfhandicapping
in adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of
Alabama, U.S.A.
SMĠTH, T. W., SNYDER, C. R. & HANDELSMAN, M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function
of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 314-321. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/42/2/314/ DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.314
SMĠTH, T. W., SNYDER, C. R. & PERKĠNS, S. C. (1983). On the self-serving function of
hypochondriacal complaints physical symptoms as self-handicapping strategies. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 787-797. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/44/4/787/ DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.787
SNYDER, C. R. & HĠGGĠNS, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of
reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23-35.
SYNDER, C.R. & SMĠTH, T.W. (1982). Symptomps as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues
of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary ve H.L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of Clinical and
Social Psychology (p.104-124). New York: Oxford University Press.
SYNDER, C. R., SMĠTH, T. W., AUGELLĠ, R. W. & INGRAM, R. E. (1985). On the self –
serving function of social anxiety: Shyness as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 970-980. Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/48/4/970/ DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.970
STRUBE, M. J. & ROEMMELE, L. A. (1985). Self-enhancemet, self-assessment, and selfevaluative
task choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49,981-993.
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4057053. DOI: 10.1037/0022-
3514.49.4.981
TĠCE, D. M., & BAUMEĠSTER, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and selfpresentation:
The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 443-464.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00237.x
TĠCE, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and
attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Personality Processes and Individual Differences,
60(5), 711-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.711
TURAN, A. F. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin iliĢkilerle ilgili biliĢsel çarpıtmalarını yordamada
yalnızlık, benlik saygısı, yaĢ, cinsiyet ve romantik iliĢki yaĢama durumunun rolü. [The role
of loneliness, self-esteem, age, gender and relationship status on the university student’s
cognitive distortions about their relationships. (Unpublished master dissertation), Anadolu
University, Turkey.
URDAN, T., MĠDGLEY, C. & ANDERMAN, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in
students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35,
101-122. Retrieved from http://aer.sagepub.com/content/35/1/101.short DOI:
10.3102/00028312035001101
URDAN, T. & MĠDGLEY, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more
there is to learn? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138. Retrieved from
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44449/1/10648_2004_Artic...
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009061303214
Investigation Of Self-Handicapping Tendencies Of Teacher Candidates
According To Demographic Variables By Controlling Self-Esteem Scores 277
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
YÜKSEL, G. (2002). Üniversite öğrencilerinin utangaçlık düzeylerini etkileyen faktörler. [Factors
influencing university students' levels of shyness]. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 22,
37-57. Retrieved from http://gefad.gazi.edu.tr/window/dosyapdf/2002/3/2002-3-37-57-
4galipycksel.pdf
ZUCKERMAN, M., KĠEFFER, S. C., & KNEE, C. R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping:
Effects on coping, academic performance and adjustment. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 74(6), 1619-1628. Retrieved from http: //faculty.kent.edu/updegraffj/
gradsocial/readings/zuckerman. Pdf. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1619
ZUCKERMAN, M., & TSAĠ, F. F. (2005). Cost of self-handicapping. Journal of Personality,
73(2), 411-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00314.x.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com