You are here

An innovative teaching practice based on online channels: A qualitative approach

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this preliminary study was to qualitatively explore the results of using low-cost educational videos, oriented at complementing face-to-face and distance courses of the Degrees in Industrial Engineering, Industrial Organization and Aeronautical Engineering at ETSEIAT (Technical School of Industrial Engineering and Aeronautical Engineering of Terrassa). Qualitative analyses showed that the use of innovative teaching practices enhances students ‘motivation, promotes dynamism in the classroom, improves students’ self-learning and increases the perceived efficiency of the learning and teaching processes, without substantially raising costs.
113-123

REFERENCES

References: 

Breen, R., Lindsay, R., Jenkins, A. and Smith, P. (2001). The role of information and communication
technologies in a university learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 95-114.
Caspi, A., Gorsky, P. and Privman, M. (2005). Viewing comprehension: Students' learning preferences
and strategies when studying from video. Instructional Science, 33 (1), 31-47.
Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: production and
evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 387-399.
Edna Bravo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez & Pep Simo / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 113-123
122
Ellis, R. and Childs, M. (1999). The effectiveness of video as a learning tool in on-line multimedia
modules. Journal of Educational Media, 24(3), 217–223.
Fendt, J. and Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded theory method in management research. Organizational
Research Methods, 11(3), 430-455.
Fernandez V., Simo, P. and Sallan, J.M. (2009). Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate
good practice in higher education. Computers & Education, 53(2), 385-392.
Fill, K. and Ottewill, R. (2006). Sink or swim: taking advantage of developments in video streaming.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 397-408.
Goldman, R. (2007). ORION, an online digital video data analysis tool: Changing our perspectives as
an interpretative community. In R. Goldman, R.D. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video
research in the learning sciences (507-520). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leijen, A., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Simons, P.R.J. and Admiraal, W. (2009). Streaming video to enhance
students' reflection in dance education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 169-176.
Marx, R.D. and Frost, P.J. (1998). Toward optimal use of video in management education: examining
the evidence. Journal of Management Development, 17(4), 243–250.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage:
Thousand Oaks, CA.
Palmer, S. (2007). An evaluation of streaming digital video resources in on- and off-campus
engineering management education. Computers & Education, 49, 297–308.
Pintrich, P.R. (2003) A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning
and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
Race, P. (1995). Making the most of video. SEDA paper, 90, 73–90.
Rieber, L.P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 83, 318–328.
Sellani, R.J. and Harrington, W. (2002). Addressing administrator/faculty conflict in an academic
online environment. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 131-145.
Shephard, K.L. (2001). Submission of student assignments on compact discs: exploring the use of
audio, images, and video in assessment and student learning. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 32(2), 161–170.
Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support
student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295–308.
Schnotz, W. and Kürschner, C. (2008). External and internal representations in the acquisition and
use of knowledge: Visualization effects on mental model construction. Instructional Science, 36,
175–190
Simo, P., Fernandez, V., Algaba, I., Salan, N., Enache, M., Albareda-Sambola, M., et al. (2010). Video
stream and teaching channels: quantitative analysis of the use of low-cost educational videos on
the web. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2937-2941
Edna Bravo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez & Pep Simo / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 113-123
123
Strom, J. (2002, May). Streaming Video: Overcoming Barriers for Teaching and Learning. Article
presented at International Symposium on Educational Conferencing, Banff, Canada.
Tang, T. and Austin, M. (2009). Student’s perceptions of teaching technologies, application of
technologies, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 53, 1241–1255.
Whalley, P. (1995). Imagining with multimedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3),
190–204.
Wisher, R.A. and Curnow, C.K. (1999). Perceptions and effects of image transmissions during
internet-based training. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 37–51.
Xingwei, H. (2004). The Design and Implementation of a General Self-learning Network Platform.
Journal of Computer Science, 31(11), 168-171.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com