You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETİM AMAÇLI HİPER METİN, HİPER ORTAM VE ÇOKLU ORTAMLAR İÇİN TASARIM İPUÇLARI

DESİGN CUES FOR INSTRUCTIONAL HYPERTEXT, HYPERMEDIA AND MULTIMEDIA

Journal Name:

  • Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study; hypertext, hypermedia and multimedia are considered in point of view of an instructional designer. First; these media were defined according to their historical development and then their advantage and disadvantages were examined. Design issues which could be taken into consideration were examined according to design principles of media structure and navigational tools and designing these media based on individual differences. Consequently; instructional designers’ decisions, functions, design issues which she/he could pay attention and their roles in instructional design are discussed in order to use hypertext, hypermedia and multimedia as learning and teaching environments.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, bir öğretim tasarımcısının bakış açısından hiper metin, hiper ortam ve çoklu ortamlar ele alınmıştır. Öncelikle bu ortamların tanımları tarihsel gelişimleri açısından ele alınmış ardından sahip oldukları avantaj ve dezavantajlar incelenmiştir. Bu ortamların tasarımlarında dikkate alınması gereken noktalar; ortam yapısı ve gezinme araçlarının tasarım ilkeleri ve bireysel farklılıkların bu tasarımlara yansıtılması açısından incelenmiştir. Son olarak hiper metin, hiper ortam ve çoklu ortamların bir öğrenme-öğretme ortamı olarak kullanılması için öğretim tasarımcısının öğretim tasarımı aşamalarında vereceği kararlar, gerçekleştireceği görevler, dikkat edeceği öğeler ve tüm bu süreçteki rolleri açısından tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
Microsoft Office document icon arastirmax-ogretim-amacli-hiper-metin-hiper-ortam-coklu-ortamlar-icin-tasarim-ipuclari.doc
12-33
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allesi, S. M. ve Trollip, A. R. (2001). Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development. 3rd edition. Massachusetts, America: Allyn and Bacon.
Altun, A. (2000). Patterns in cognitive process and strategies in hypertext reading: A case study of two experienced computer users. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (1), 35-55.
Andris, J. F. (1996).The relationship of indices of student navigational patterns in a hypermedia geology lab simulation to two measures of learning style. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (3), 227-251.
Boyle, T. (1997). Design for Multimedia. England: Prentice Hall.
Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A. ve Underwood, J. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers and Education, 44 (4), 441-457.
Chen, S. Y. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 449-460.
Chen, S. Y., Fan, J. ve Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251-266.
Chen, S. Y. ve Macredie, R. D. (2001). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (1), 3-15.
Chen, W. ve Dwyer, F. (2003). Hypermedia research: Present and future. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30 (2), 143-148.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey. IEEE Computer, 20 (9), 17-41.
Chou, C., Lin, H., Sun, C. (2000). Navigation maps in hierarchical-structured hypertext courseware. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27 (2), 165-182.
Danielson, D. R. (2002). Transitional Volatility in Web Navigation: Usability Metrics and User Behavior. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Stanford University, U.S.A.
DeBoard, D. R., ve Lee, D. (2001). Using an architectural metaphor for information design in hypertext. Journal of Educational Media, 26 (1), 49-62.
Dede, C. ve Lewis, M. (1995). Assessment of Emerging Educational Technologies That Might Assist and Enhance School-to-Work Transitions. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.
Demirbilek, M. (2004). Effects of interface windowing modes and individual differences on disorientation and cognitive load in a hypermedia learning environment. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Florida.
De Vries, E. ve De Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science, 27, 285-302.
Dias, P. ve Sousa, P. (1997). Understanding navigation and disorientation in hypermedia learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6 (2). 173-185.
Dillon, A. ve Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: a review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), 322-349.
Ford, N. ve Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (4), 281-311.
Jonassen, D. H. (1986). Hypertext Principles for Text and Courseware Design. Educational Psychologist, 21 (4). 269-292.
Jonassen, D. H. (1989). Hypertext/hypermedia. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Jonassen, D. H. ve Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences. Learning and Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Jonassen, D. H., ve Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (s. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
Jonassen, D.H. ve Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 1-8.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kommers, P. A. M. (2002). Four stages in esigning educational hypermedia. In Orhun, E. ve Kommers, P. A. M. (Editors). Information and Communication Technologies in Education: A Focus on Cognitive Tools. (s. 29-61). İzmir, Türkiye: Ege Üniversitesi.
Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 179-211.
Kyaw, P. ve Boldyreff, C. (1998). A Survey of Hypermedia Design Methods in the Context of World Wide Web Design, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ kyaw98survey.html adresinden 15.10.2004 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Last, D. ve O’Donnell, A. M. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (1), 3-25.
Melara, G. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14 (4), 313-328.
Maule, R. W. (2001). Framework for Metacognitive Mapping to Design Metadata for Intelligent Hypermedia Presentations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (1), 27-45.
McDonald, S. ve Stevenson, R. J. (1998). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext, Human Factors, 40 (1), 18-27.
McKnight, C., Dillon, A. ve Richardson, J. (1990). A comparison of linear and hypertext formats in information retrieval. In R. McAleese ve C. Green (Eds.), Hypertext: State of the art (s. 10-19). Oxford: Intellect.
Rasmussen, K., & Davidson-Shivers, G. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7 (4), 291-308.
Rossi, G., Schwabe, D. ve Lyardet, F. (1998). Patterns for designing navigable information spaces. PLoP98 Conference, Monticello, USA.
Rumpradit, C. ve Donnell, M. L. (1999). Navigational cues on interface design to produce better information seeking on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Shapiro, A. ve Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (s. 605-620). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shu-Sheng, L. (2001). Designing the hypermedia-based learning environments. International Journal of Educational Multimedia, 28 (1). 43-57.
Spiro, R.J. ve Jehng, J.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext. Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix ve R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia. Exploring ideas in high technology (s. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanton, N., Correria ve Dias, P. (2000). Efficacy of a map on search, orientation and acess behaviour in a hypermedia system. Computers and Education, 35, 263-279.
Theng, Y. L., Rigny, C., Thimbleby, H. ve Jones, M. (1997). HyperAT: HCI and Web Authoring. Proceedings of People and Computers XII, Bristol, 359-378.
Tilley, S.R., Whitney, M.J., Müler, H.A. ve Storey, M.-A.D. (1993) Personalized information structures, SIGDOC '93: The 11th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, Waterloo, 325-337.
Tolhurst, D. (1995). Hypertext, hypermedia, multimedia defined?. Educational Technology, 35 (2), 21-26.
Türkiye Bilişim Derneği [TBD], (2005). İngilizce Sıralı Sözlük Kütüğü, http://eski.tbd.org.tr/ing_turk.html adresinden 19.06.2005 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Türk Dil Kurumu [TDK], (2005). Bilgisayar Terimleri Sözlüğü, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/bilterim/h_bt_05.htm adresinden 19.06.2005 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com