Alpas, B. ve Akçakın, M. (2003). Vineland uyum davranış ölçeği- Araştırma formu’nun
doğumdan 47 aylığa kadar olan türk bebekleri için uyarlama, güvenirlik ve
geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 18(52), 57-76.
Aşkar, P. ve Dönmez, O. (2004). Eğitim yazılımı geliştirme öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeği.
Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 3(6), 259-268.
Boersma, F.J. & Chapman, J.W. (1979). Student's perception of ability scale. Manual.
Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
Bracken, B.A. & Lamprecht, S.M. (2003). Pozitive self-concept: an equal opportunity
construct. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 103-121.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for
Windows:A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Routledge .
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A
Yayıncılık.
Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review
of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
Dağ, İ. (2002). Kontrol odağı ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması.
Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17 (49), 77-90.
Ergin, D.Y. (1995). Ölçeklerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi
Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7,125-148.
Gecas, V. & Mortimer, J.T. (1987). Stability and change in the self-concept from
adolescence to adulthood. In T. Honess & K. Yardley (Eds.) Self and Identity.
London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., Boivin, M. (2003). Akademic self-concept and academic
achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124-136.
Hamachek, D. E. (1971). Encounters with the Self. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston, Inc.
_______. 1990. Evaluating self-concept and ego status in Erickson’s last three
psychosocial stages. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68(6),
677.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53,
87-97.
_______. (1999). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. The
Guilford Pres. A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc, New York.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor
analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute
Hay, I. (2000). Cognitive strategies in the secondary school: Investigating process based
instruction and students’ perceptions of effective teaching strategies. Journal of
Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 164–176.
Hay, I., Ashman, A. & Van Kraayenoord, C. (1998). The educational characteristics of
students with high or low self-concept. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 391–400.
Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Danışmanlık
Limited.
Kulaksızloğlu, A., Dilmaç, B., Ekşi, H., ve Otrar M. (2003). Uyum ölçeği-üniversite
formu’nun dilsel eşdeğerlik, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Bilimleri
ve Uygulama, 2 (3), 49-63.
Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Parkins, E. J. (2005). A longitudinal study of students’
academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 567-586.
Marsh, H.W. (1986). The bias of negatively worded items in rating scales for young
children: A cognitive developmental phenomena. Developmental Psychology,
22,37-49.
_______. (1988). Self description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for
the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test
manual and a research monograph. San Antonio TX: The Psychological
Corporation.
_______. (1990a). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical
and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.
_______. (1990b).Causal ordering of academic self concept and academic achievement:
A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,
82, 646-656.
_______. (1992). Self description qustionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical
basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent selfconcept.
An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New
South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
http://self.uws.edu.au/Research%20Focus/self_instruments.htm. Kaynaktan
3/5/2007 tarihinde alınmıştır
Marsh, H. W., Iain W., Holmes, M. (1990). Multidimensional self-concept: Conctruct
Validation of Responses by Children. American Educational Research Journal.
Spring, 27, 89-117.
Marsh, H. W. & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical
structure. Educational Psychologist. 20, 107–125.
Marsh, H. W. & Hacover, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to
the study of self concept: First and higher order factor structure and their
invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M. & Shavelson, R.J. (1988). A Multifaceted academic selfconcept:
Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In
G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement and
Adjustment (131–198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Marsh, H.W. & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on
academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54.
Marsh, H.W. & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become
more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 687–706.
Marsh, H. W., Hau K.T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic
self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the
internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56-67.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago. Phoenix. (Original work
published 1934).
Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating
Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage
Publications.
Nunually, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd ed.)New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Mara, A. J., Marsh H. W., Craven, R. G. & Debus, R. L. (2006). Do self-concept
interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and
meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181-206.
Osborne, J.W. & Costello, A.B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in
principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation.
9(11). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11
Özgüven, İ.E. (1994). Psikolojik Testler. Ankara: Yeni Doğuş Matbaası.
Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality: Theory and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Preacher, K.J. & MacCallum, R.C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior
genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample size. Behavior Genetics.,32
(2), 153-161.
Rice, F.P. (1975). The Adolescent Development, Relationships and Culture. Boston:
Ally and Bacon, Inc.
Rosenberg, M. (1975). Self-concept and self-esteem. In P. F. Rice(Ed.) The Adolescent
Development, Relationships and Culture. Boston: Ally and Bacon, Inc.
Sapnas, K.G. (2004). Letters to the editor: Determining adequate sample size. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship. 36(1), 4, www. Retrieved August 03, 2004 from blackwell
synergy.com.
Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct
interpretations of test scores. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
Shavelson, R. J., Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 3-17.
Skaalvik, E. M., Hagtvet K. A. (1990). Academic achievement and self-concept: An
analysis of casual predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 292-307.
Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel
Yayın Dağıtım.
Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı yayınları, no: 17.
Turgut, M. F. (1997). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metodları. Ankara: Gül
Yayınevi
Vispoel, W. P. (1995). Self-concept in the arts: An extension of the Shavelson Model.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134-145.
Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of Self-Concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Yeung, A. S., Chui H. S., Lau I. C, McInerney, D. M, Russell-Bowie, D., & Suliman, R.
(2000). Where is the hierarchy of academic self-concept? Journal of Educational
Psychology, 92, 556-567.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com