You are here

ÖZ KAVRAM ENVANTERİ-I’İN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

VALIDITY and RELIABILITY of the SELF-DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE-I

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was designed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of “Self Description Questionnaire-I” which was developed by Marsh (1992) within the framework of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) theory of self-concept. In this study, descriptive research design was used. The questionnaire was applied 345 seventh grade students from seven different primary schools in Beşiktaş, İstanbul. Pearson's correlation with coefficients ranging from 0.47 to 0.97 between the Turkish and English versions of the questionnaire. The correlations were significant at the 0.01 level. The results of factor analysis for construct validity of the questionnaire addressed seven subscale constructs with 60 items. The total internal reliability of scale was a 0.95 reliability coefficient. Findings demonstrated that the subscales had internal consistency reliability with item total correlation, ranging from 0.17 to 0.65. The results were discussed in terms of the validity and reliability of the Turkish version.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Shavelson, Hubner ve Stanton’un (1976) öz kavram modeli çalışmalarına dayanan ve Marsh (1992) tarafından geliştirilen “Öz Kavram Envanteri-I” (ÖKE-I) Türkçe formunun dilsel eşdeğerliğinin, geçerliğinin ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesidir. Betimsel araştırma yöntemlerinden genel tarama modeli ile yapılan bu araştırmada, ÖKE-I, İstanbul ili, Beşiktaş ilçesinde bulunan yedi farklı ilköğretim okulundan 345 kişilik 7. sınıf öğrencisinden oluşan çalışma grubuna uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerliği için yapılan Türkçe ve İngilizce uygulama arasındaki Pearson korelasyon katsayılarında 0.47 ile 0.97 arasında değişen ve 0.01 düzeyinde pozitif ve anlamlı değerlere ulaşılmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini saptamak için yapılan faktör analizi, yedi faktörlü, 60 maddeli yapı ortaya koymuştur. Ölçeğin bütünü için hesaplanan iç tutarlık güvenirlik katsayısı 0.95’tir. Bulgular, faktör maddelerinin iç tutarlık güvenirliğinin 0.17 ile 0.65 arasında değişen madde-toplam korelasyon katsayısına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, envanterin Türkçe formunun geçerliği ve güvenirliği bakımından tartışılmıştır.
209-232

REFERENCES

References: 

Alpas, B. ve Akçakın, M. (2003). Vineland uyum davranış ölçeği- Araştırma formu’nun
doğumdan 47 aylığa kadar olan türk bebekleri için uyarlama, güvenirlik ve
geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 18(52), 57-76.
Aşkar, P. ve Dönmez, O. (2004). Eğitim yazılımı geliştirme öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeği.
Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 3(6), 259-268.
Boersma, F.J. & Chapman, J.W. (1979). Student's perception of ability scale. Manual.
Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
Bracken, B.A. & Lamprecht, S.M. (2003). Pozitive self-concept: an equal opportunity
construct. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 103-121.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for
Windows:A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Routledge .
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A
Yayıncılık.
Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review
of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
Dağ, İ. (2002). Kontrol odağı ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması.
Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17 (49), 77-90.
Ergin, D.Y. (1995). Ölçeklerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi
Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7,125-148.
Gecas, V. & Mortimer, J.T. (1987). Stability and change in the self-concept from
adolescence to adulthood. In T. Honess & K. Yardley (Eds.) Self and Identity.
London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., Boivin, M. (2003). Akademic self-concept and academic
achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124-136.
Hamachek, D. E. (1971). Encounters with the Self. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston, Inc.
_______. 1990. Evaluating self-concept and ego status in Erickson’s last three
psychosocial stages. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68(6),
677.
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53,
87-97.
_______. (1999). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. The
Guilford Pres. A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc, New York.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor
analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute
Hay, I. (2000). Cognitive strategies in the secondary school: Investigating process based
instruction and students’ perceptions of effective teaching strategies. Journal of
Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 164–176.
Hay, I., Ashman, A. & Van Kraayenoord, C. (1998). The educational characteristics of
students with high or low self-concept. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 391–400.
Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Danışmanlık
Limited.
Kulaksızloğlu, A., Dilmaç, B., Ekşi, H., ve Otrar M. (2003). Uyum ölçeği-üniversite
formu’nun dilsel eşdeğerlik, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Bilimleri
ve Uygulama, 2 (3), 49-63.
Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Parkins, E. J. (2005). A longitudinal study of students’
academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 567-586.
Marsh, H.W. (1986). The bias of negatively worded items in rating scales for young
children: A cognitive developmental phenomena. Developmental Psychology,
22,37-49.
_______. (1988). Self description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for
the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test
manual and a research monograph. San Antonio TX: The Psychological
Corporation.
_______. (1990a). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical
and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.
_______. (1990b).Causal ordering of academic self concept and academic achievement:
A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,
82, 646-656.
_______. (1992). Self description qustionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical
basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent selfconcept.
An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New
South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
http://self.uws.edu.au/Research%20Focus/self_instruments.htm. Kaynaktan
3/5/2007 tarihinde alınmıştır
Marsh, H. W., Iain W., Holmes, M. (1990). Multidimensional self-concept: Conctruct
Validation of Responses by Children. American Educational Research Journal.
Spring, 27, 89-117.
Marsh, H. W. & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical
structure. Educational Psychologist. 20, 107–125.
Marsh, H. W. & Hacover, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to
the study of self concept: First and higher order factor structure and their
invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M. & Shavelson, R.J. (1988). A Multifaceted academic selfconcept:
Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In
G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement and
Adjustment (131–198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Marsh, H.W. & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on
academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54.
Marsh, H.W. & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become
more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 687–706.
Marsh, H. W., Hau K.T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic
self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the
internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56-67.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago. Phoenix. (Original work
published 1934).
Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating
Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage
Publications.
Nunually, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd ed.)New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Mara, A. J., Marsh H. W., Craven, R. G. & Debus, R. L. (2006). Do self-concept
interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and
meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181-206.
Osborne, J.W. & Costello, A.B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in
principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation.
9(11). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11
Özgüven, İ.E. (1994). Psikolojik Testler. Ankara: Yeni Doğuş Matbaası.
Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality: Theory and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Preacher, K.J. & MacCallum, R.C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior
genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample size. Behavior Genetics.,32
(2), 153-161.
Rice, F.P. (1975). The Adolescent Development, Relationships and Culture. Boston:
Ally and Bacon, Inc.
Rosenberg, M. (1975). Self-concept and self-esteem. In P. F. Rice(Ed.) The Adolescent
Development, Relationships and Culture. Boston: Ally and Bacon, Inc.
Sapnas, K.G. (2004). Letters to the editor: Determining adequate sample size. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship. 36(1), 4, www. Retrieved August 03, 2004 from blackwell
synergy.com.
Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Validation of construct
interpretations of test scores. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
Shavelson, R. J., Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 3-17.
Skaalvik, E. M., Hagtvet K. A. (1990). Academic achievement and self-concept: An
analysis of casual predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 292-307.
Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel
Yayın Dağıtım.
Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı yayınları, no: 17.
Turgut, M. F. (1997). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metodları. Ankara: Gül
Yayınevi
Vispoel, W. P. (1995). Self-concept in the arts: An extension of the Shavelson Model.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134-145.
Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of Self-Concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Yeung, A. S., Chui H. S., Lau I. C, McInerney, D. M, Russell-Bowie, D., & Suliman, R.
(2000). Where is the hierarchy of academic self-concept? Journal of Educational
Psychology, 92, 556-567.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com