You are here

Home » Content

PIRLS 2001 TESTİNİN YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNİN ÜLKELERARASI KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF CONSTRUCT VALIDITIES OF THE PIRLS 2001 TEST BETWEEN COUNTRIES

Journal Name:

  • Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this work, the equivalence of factor structures obtained from the application of PIRLS 2001 test in 35 countries is analyzed via multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The invariance of the factor structures of PIRLS 2001 test in 35 countries is tested in the level of the four subscales which are applied in all countries. The findings have shown that, the factor structure of PIRLS 2001 test is equivalent in all participant countries
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, PIRLS 2001 başarı testinin, 35 ülkede yapılmış olan uygulamasından elde edilen faktör yapılarının birbirine denkliği çok gruplu doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile incelenmiştir. PIRLS 2001 başarı testinin faktör yapısının 35 ülkede değişmezliği tüm ülkelerde uygulanmış olan dört ayrı alt ölçek bağlamında ayrı ayrı test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular PIRLS 2001 testinin faktör yapısının uygulamaya katılan tüm ülkelerde birbirine orta düzeyde denk sayılabileceğini göstermiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-pirls-2001-testinin-yapi-gecerliliginin-ulkelerarasi-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
18-47
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme. Klasik Test Teorisi ve
Uygulaması. Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınları.
Brown, G., Micklewright, J., Schneph, S. V., Waldmann, R. (2005), Cross-National
Surveys of Learning Achievement: How Robust are the Findings?, Southampton
Statistical Sciences Research Institute Applications & Policy Working Paper,
A05/05. United Kingdom
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New
York: The Guilford Press.
Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing
measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary
Journal , 233-255.
Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Testing measurement invariance using critical
values of fit indices: A Monte Carlo study. Web:
http://division.aomonline.org/rm/cheung_files/cheung.htm adresinden 10 Nisan
2009 tarihinde alınmıştır
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Consruct Validity in Psychological Tests.
Psychological Bulletin , 281-302.
Foy, P. (2004), Intraclass Correlation And Variance Components As Population
Attributes And Measures Of Sampling Efficiency In PIRLS 2001. The 1st IEA
International Research Conference. Yayımlanmamış kongre bildirisi. Web:
http://www.iea-dpc.org/download/ieahq/IRC2004/Foy.pdf adresinden 24 Mart
2008 tarihinde alınmıştır.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows: A Simple Guide and
Reference. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gonzalez, E. J. and Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 User Guide for the
International Database. Chestnut hill, Boston College.
Hilton, M. (2006). Measuring standarts in primary Englsh: Issues of validity and
accountability with respect to PIRLS and National Curriculum test scores. Britsh
Educational research Journal , 32 (6), 817-837.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure
analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation
Modeling , 1-55.
Johansone ve Foy, 2004 PIRLS 2001 Results In The Context Of The European Union
Expansion, The 1st IEA International Research Conference. Yayımlanmamış
kongre bildirisi.
Web: http://www.iea-dpc.org/download/ieahq/IRC2004/Johansone_Foy.pdf 24
Mart 2008 Tarihinde Alınmıştır.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New
York: The Guilford Press.
Martin, M. O. Mullis, I. V. S. Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 Technical Report,
International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, USA
Mullis, Ina V.S., Martin, Michael O., Gonzalez, Eugenio J., Ann M. (2003), Prils 2001
International Report, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education,Boston College, USA
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A First Course in Structural Equation
Modeling. Routledge Inc.
Rodriguez, M. C. (2006). Construct Equivalence of Multiple-Choice and Constructed-
Response Items: A Random Effects Synthesis of Correlations. Journal of
Educational Measurement , 163-184.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Washington:
American Psychological Association.
Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. K. A. Bollen,
& J. S. Long içinde, Testing structural equation models (s. 256-293). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com