Buradasınız

İnsan fetuslarında m. plantaris’in morfometrisi

Morphometry of plantaris muscle in human fetuses

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This detailed fetus study about plantaris muscle was performed to compare the measurements of adults and fetuses, and to obtain additional information about clinical procedures associated with educational anatomy dissections. The study was performed on 24 fetuses with gestational ages of 17-40 weeks and without any pathology or anomaly. The length and width of the tendineous portion and muscular belly of the plantaris muscle were measured in fetuses. M. plantaris was absent unilaterally and bilaterally in a male fetus and a female fetus, respectively. Most of the fetuses (83%) had a typical shape of plantaris muscle and its tendon. Mean length and width of the tendon were 36.35 and 0.43 mm, and 65.39 and 0.95 mm, in second and third trimesters, respectively. Mean length and width of the muscular belly were 7.48 and 2.96 mm, and 17.58 and 5.82 mm in second and third trimesters, respectively. This fetus study about plantaris muscle would bu useful in surgical interventions performed in educational anatomy dissections and related clinical procedures.
Abstract (Original Language): 
M. plantaris ile ilgili bu detaylı fetus çalışması, erişkin ile fetus arasındaki ölçümleri karşılaştırmak ve eğitimsel anatomi disseksiyonları ile ilgili klinik prosedürlerde ek bilgi sağlaması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışma, herhangi bir patoloji veya anomalisi olmayan 17-40 hafta arasındaki 24 fetusta yapılmıştır. M. plantaris’in tendon ve karın bölümünün uzunluk ve genişliği öl- çülmüştür. M. plantaris bir erkek fetusta unilateral, bir kız fetusta da bilateral olarak yoktu. Fetusların çoğunda (%83) m. plantaris’in ve tendonunun şekli tipik özelliklere sahipti. İkinci trimesterde tendonun ortalama uzunluk ve genişliği sırasıyla 36.35 ve 0.43 mm, üçüncü trimesterde ise sırasıyla 65.39 ve 0.95 mm idi. İkinci trimesterde karın bölümünün uzunluk ve genişliği sırasıyla ortalama 7.48 ve 2.96 mm, üçüncü trimesterde ise sırasıyla 17.58 ve 5.82 mm idi. M. plantaris ile ilgili fetus çalışması, eğitimsel anatomi disseksiyonları ve ilgili klinik prosedürlerde yapılan cerrahi girişimler için faydalı olacaktır.
149-153

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Standring S, Gray’s Anatomy. In: Mahadevan V (ed).
Pelvic girdle and lower limb. 40th ed. Section 9, Chapter
83. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone, 2008: 1421.
2. Tixa S, Netter FH. Atlas of Palpatory Anatomy of Limbs
and Trunk. 1st ed. Teterboro, New Jersey: Saunders,
2003: 333.
3. Wood J. On some varieties in human myology. Proc
Roy Soc Lond B 1864; 13: 299-303.
4. Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R. Plantaris. Virtual
Hospital: Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic
Variation: Opus I: Muscular System. Available
a t : h t t p : / / w w w . v h . o r g / a d u l t / p r o v i d e r / a n a t o m y /
AnatomicVariants/MuscularSystem/Text/P/29Plantaris.
html. [Accessed on: October 15, 2005].
5. Delgado GJ, Chung CB, Lektrakul N, et al. Tennis
leg: Clinical US study of 141 patients and anatomic
investigation of four cadavers with MR imaging and US.
Radiology 2002; 224: 112-119.
6. Helms CA, Fritz RC, Garvin GJ. Plantaris muscle injury:
Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 195:
201-203.
7. Leekam RN, Agur AM, McKee NH. Using sonography to
diagnose injury of plantaris muscles and tendons. AJR
1999; 172: 185-189.
8. Testut L, Latarjet A. Tratado de anatomia humana. 3rd
ed. Rio de Janeiro: Salvat, 1977; 1165-1166.
9. Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R. Anatomia. 4th ed. Rio
de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1988: 227.
10. Goss CM, Gray H. Anatomia. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro:
Guanabara Koogan, 1988: 800-859.
11. Rana KK, Srijit Das S, Verma R. Double plantaris
muscle: a cadaveric study with clinical importance. Int
J Morphol 2006; 24: 495-498.
12. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy.
In: Wicke L (ed). Lower limb. 5th ed. Chapter 5.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:
648-649.
13. Aragão JA, Reıs FP, Guerra DR, Cabral RH. The
occurrence of the plantaris muscle and its muscletendon relationship in adult human cadavers. Int J
Morphol 2010; 28: 255-258.
14. Allard JC, Bancroft J, Porter G. Imaging of plantaris
muscle rupture. Clin Imaging 1993; 16: 55-58.
15. Alagoz MS, Uysal AC, Tuccar E, Tekdemir I. Morphologic
assessment of the tendon graft donor sites: palmaris
longus, plantaris, tensor fascia lata. J Craniofac Surg
2008; 19: 246-250.
16. Daseler MS, Ansorn BJ. The plantaris muscle; an
anatomical study of 750 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg
1943; 25: 822-827.
17. Simpson SL, Hertzog MS, Barja RH. The plantaris
tendon graft: an ultrasound study. J Hand Surg 1991;
16: 708-711.
18. Harvey JF, Chu G, Harvey PM. Surgical availability of
the plantaris tendon. J Hand Surg 1983; 8: 243-247.
19. Wehbe MA. Tendon graft donor sites. J Hand Surg [Am]
1992; 17: 1130-1132.
20. Richardson ML. Plantaris. Lower Extremity Muscle
Atlas. Available at: http://www.rad.washington.edu/
atlas2/plantaris.html. [Accessed on: October 15, 2005].
21. Mozena J, Pearson DD. Plantaris tendon ruptures
(letter). J Am Podiatry Assoc 2004; 94: 505-508.
22. Hamilton W, Klostermeier T, Lim EV, Moulton JS.
Surgically documented rupture of the plantaris muscle:
a case report and literature review. Foot Ankle Int 1997;
18: 522-523.
23. Harmon KJ, Reeder MT, Udermann BE, Murray SR.
Isolated rupture of the plantaris tendon in a high school
track athlete. Clin J Sport Med 2006; 16: 361-363.
24. Gilbert TJ, Bullis BR, Griffiths HJ. Tenis calf or tennis
leg. Orthopedics 1996; 19: 179-184.
25. Miller WA. Rupture of the musculotendinous juncture
of the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. Am J
Sports Med 1977; 5: 191–193.
26. Severance HJ, Bassett FH III. Rupture of the plantaris:
does it exist? J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1387-1388.
27. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF, Derchi LE,
Damiani S. Sonographic evaluation of tears of the
gastrocnemius medial head (“tennis leg”). J Ultrasound
Med 1998; 17: 157-162.
28. Green PD, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC. Green’s
Operative Hand Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill
Livingstone, 1999: 1898-1941.
29. Carlson GD, Botte MJ, Josephs MS, et al. Morphologic
and biomechanical comparison of tendons used as free
grafts. J Hand Surg [Am] 1993; 18: 76-82.
30. White WL. Tendon grafts: a consideration of their
source, procurement and suitability. Surg Clin North
Am 1960; 40: 403-413.
31. Spina AA. The plantaris muscle: anatomy, injury,
imaging, and treatment. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2007; 51:
158-165.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com