1. AlJJuwairi Y, Hamou RH. Amalgam restorations: A new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1993 ; 69: 138-40.
2.
Altınbula
k H, Ergül N, Okşan T. Amalgam değiştirilme nedenleri ve sıklığı üzerine klinik bir çalışma. Ege Diş Hek Fak Derg 1994; 15: 91-7.
3.
Bayırl
ı G. Endodontik tedavi. Taz Matbaası, İstanbul, 1985: 430.
4. Birkhed D. Cariologic aspects of xylitol and its use in chewing gum: A review. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 116-27.
5. Cheung GSP. Reducing marjinal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: A review of clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 286-8.
6. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent.to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 359-64.
7. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condor JR, Todd R. Wear and marjinal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 1997; 76(8): 1508-16.
8. Fusayama T. Posterior adhesive composite resin: A historic review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 534-8.
9.
Gürga
n S, Ayhan A. Taşkın amalgam dolgunun gingiva üzerine etkisi (Bir olgu nedeniyle). Oral Derg 1992; 8(94): 11-13.
28
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Derg.
Cilt:9, Sayı:l, Sayfa:25-29,1999
BULUCU, YOLDAŞ, SEVİLMİŞ
10. Jokstad A, Mjör Al, Quist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 2235-42.
11. Kidd EAM, Smith BGN, Pickard HM. Pickards manual of operative dentistry. 6 ed Oxford University Press, 1990: 15.
12.
Kora
y F. Diş çürükleri. Altın Matbaacılık, 1981: 5.
13.
Köprül
ü H. Diş çürüğünün modern yöntemle tedavisi. Türk Dişhekimliği Birliği Dergisi 1995; 26: 29-31.
14.
Köprül
ü H. Kenar sızıntısının azaltılmasında kullanılan materyal ve tekniklerin önemi. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fak Derg 1988; 12(4): 253-7.
15. Kroeze HJP, Plasschaert AJM, Hof MAV, Truin GJ. Prevalance and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutch adults. J Dent Res 1990; 69/6): 1270-4.
16. Leinfelder KF, Yarnell G. Occlusion and restorative materials. Dental Clinics of North America. 1995; 39(2): 355-61.
17. Lutz F, Imfeld T, Meier CG, Firestone AR. Composites versus amalgam-comperative measurements of in vivo wear resistance: 1 year report. Quinttessence Int 1979; 3: 77-87.
18. Mannerberg F. Five years axperience with isosit-microfill restorative material. Quinttessence Int 1980; 8: 53-63.
19. Midda M, König KG. Nutrition, diet and oral health. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 599-612.
20. Mjör Al, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. OperativeDent 1992; 17: 70-3.
21. Mjör AI. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 466-72.
22. Navia JM. Nutrition and dental caries: Ten findings to be remembered. Int Dent J 1996; 46(1): 381-7.
23. Newbrun E. Problems in caries diagnosis. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 133-42.
24. Pimenta LAF, Nauorro MFL, Consolara A. Sekonder caries arround amalgam restorations. .1 Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 219-22.
25. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost effectiveness of five dentalrestorative materials in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 126-30.
26. Vanharle G, Lambrechts P, Braem. An evaluation of different adhesive restorations in cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 341-7.
27. Wanman A, Wigren L. Need and demand for dental treatment. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 318-24.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com