Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

BÜROLARDA TEKNOLOJİ KABUL VE KULLANIMI: GELİŞTİRİLMİŞ TEKNOLOJİ KABUL MODELİ İLE BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ VE SEKRETERLER ÜZERİNDE AMPİRİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Bakış

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
As Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have started to penetrate our daily lives intensively and employed in office environments, consequent changes observed in our individual, social and professional lives. Especially, with the recent trend of women joining to the work force, we have observed their large employment in office environments. Women are largely employed as secretaries in today’s offices. Secretaries could make direct and significant impacts on efficiencies of managers and other employees in office environments and quality of their work outputs. However, academic studies on secretaries are very limited. In this study, technology acceptance and usage of secretaries residing in İzmir province have been tested empirically with one of the most widely used Management Information Systems (MIS) theoretical frameworks, the extended version of Technology Acceptance Model (E-TAM) by using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The data gave large empirical support to the relationships posed by underlying theoretical framework.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin günlük hayatımıza yoğun olarak girmesi ve iş ortamlarında yoğun olarak kullanılmaya başlaması çeşitli bireysel, sosyal ve profesyonel değişikliklere yol açmıştır. Özellikle kadınların son yıllarda yoğun olarak iş hayatına katılmasında ve ofis ortamlarında istihdamlarında artış gözlenmiştir. Günümüzde, ofis ortamlarında kadınların en yaygın olarak istihdam edildiği meslek sekreterliktir. Sekreterler ofislerde yöneticilerin ve tüm diğer ofis çalışanlarının verimliliklerine ve iş çıktı kalitesine direkt ve önemli etki yapabilen bireylerdir. Ancak, sekreterler üzerinde yapılan bilimsel çalışmalar oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmada İzmir ilinde ikamet eden sekreterlerin teknoloji kabul ve kullanımları, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri (MIS) literatüründe yaygın olarak kullanılan sosyal-psikoloji temelli Teknoloji Kabul Modelinin (TAM) geliştirilmiş bir versiyonu olan Geliştirilmiş Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (e-TAM) ile ampirik olarak, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (SEM) kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Eldeki veri seti önerilen modeli oluşturan teorik ilişkileri ampirik olarak kuvvetli şekilde destekler niteliktedir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-burolarda-teknoloji-kabul-kullanimi-gelistirilmis-teknoloji-kabul-modeli-ile-bir-model-onerisi-sekreterler-uzerinde-ampirik-bir-degerlendirme.pdf
  • 19
1-16
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AGERVOLD, M. (1987), “New Technology in the Office: Attitudes and Consequences”, Work
and Stress, 1(2), ss.143-153.
AJZEN, I. (1985), From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, J. Kuhl & J.
Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Berlin, Heildelber, New York:
Springer-Verlag.
AUSTIN, E. (1987), Senior Secretarial Duties and Office Organization, London: Pitman
Publishing, Third Edition.
BOUDREAU, M. & ROBEY, D. (2005), “Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A
Human Agency Perspective”, Organization Science, 16(1), ss. 3-18.
BÜLBÜL, H. İ. & GÜRBÜZ, R. (2007), Bürolarda Teknoloji Kullanımı, Ankara : Nobel Yayın
Dağıtım.
CHAU, Y.K., HU, J.H. (2001), “Information Technology acceptance by individual professionals:
A model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, (32:4), ss. 699-718.
DAVİS, F. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of
Information Technologies”, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), ss.319-339.
FİSHBEİN, M. & AJZEN, I. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
FU, J-R, FARN, C-K., CHAO, W-P. (2006), “Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of
taxpayer intentions”, Information & Management, (43: ), ss.109-126.
HAKKEN, D. (1993), “Computing and Social Change: New Technology and Workplace
Transformation”, 1980 - 1990, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., (22: ), ss.107-132.
HU, P.J.H., CLARK, T.H.K. & MA, W.W.K. (2003), “Examining Technology Acceptance by
School Teachers: A Longitudinal Study”, Information & Management, (41: ), ss.227-241.
JENSEN, T. B. & AANESTAD, M. (2007), “How Health Care Professionals Make Sense of an
Electronic Patient Record Adoption”, Information Systems Management, 24(1), ss.29-42.
JÖRESKOG, K., SÖRBOM, D. (1999), Lisrel 8: User’s Referance Guide, Chicago, IL 2nd
Edition, Scientific Software International.
KARABAĞ, A. (2000), 2000’li Yıllarda Sekreterlik, İstanbul: Akba Yayıncılık, Üçüncü Basım.
KHALİD, H., SWİFT, H. ve CULLİNGFORD, C. (2002), “The New Technologies and Its
Effects on Secretaries and Managers”, Education and Information Technologies, (7:3), ss.257-
274.
KELLER, C. (2005), “Virtual Learning Environments: Three Implementation Perspectives”,
Learning, Media and Technology, (30:3), ss. 299-311.
KRAFT, J.F. & SİEGENTHALER, J.K. (1989), “Office Automation, Gender and Change: An
Analysis of the Management Literature”, Science, Technology and Human Values, (14:2), ss.195-
212.
LEGRIS, P., INGHAM, J. & COLLERETTE, P. (2003), “Why do People Use Information
Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model”, Information and
Management, Vol: 40, ss.191-204.
LONG, R.J. (1993), “The Impact of New Office Information Technology on Job Quality of
Female and Male Employees”, Human Relations, (48:6), ss. 939-960.
MA, W. W., ANDERSON, R. & STREITH, K. O. (2005), “Examining User Acceptance of
Computer Technology: An Empirical Study of Student Teachers”, Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, (21: ), ss. 387-395.

MARİNO, P. (1993), “The Use of Information Technology and Its Relationship to the Job
Characteristics of Administrative Support Personel”, Office Systems Research Journal, Spring,
ss.1-14.
MARTINEZ-TORRES, M.R., TORAL MARIN, S.L., GARCIA, F.B., VAZQUEZ, S.G.,
OLIVA, M.A. & TORRES, T. (2006), “A Technology Acceptance of e-learning Tools Used in
Practical Laboratory Teaching, According to the European Higher Education Area”, Behavior
and Information Technology, ss.1-11.
MORTON, M.S. (1996), “How Information Technologies Can Transform Organization”, In
Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, R. Kling (ed), ss.148-160
NUNNALLY, J. C. (1978), PsychometricTheory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
TAYLOR, S., TODD, P.A. (1995), “Understanding Information Technology usage: A test of
competing models”, Information Systems Research, (6:2), ss.144-176.
TAVAKOLIAN, H. (1989), “Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational
Competitive Strategy”, MIS Quarterly, (13:3), ss. 309-317.
TEKİN, M., H.K. GÜLEŞ & A. ÖĞÜT (2003), Teknoloji Yönetimi, Konya: Nobel Yayın
Dağıtım.
TUTAR, H. (2002), Yönetici Sekreterliği, Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
USLUEL, Y.K, AŞKAR, P. & BAŞ, T. (2008), “A Structural Equation Model for ICT Usage in
Higher Education”, Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), ss.262-273.
UYGUR, A. & GÖRAL, R. (2005), Büro Yönetimi, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
VURAL, B. (2002), İş Hayatından Örneklerle Yönetici Asistanlığı, İstanbul: Hayat Yayıncılık.
WANG, Y,S. (2002), “The Adoption of Electronic Tax Filling Systems: An Empirical Study”,
Government Information Quarterly, (20: ), ss. 333-352.
YAP, C.S. (1990), “Distinguishing Characteristics of Organizations Using Computers”,
Information and Management, 18(2), ss. 97-107.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com